In the Czech Republic, not many data are available on the associations between behavioural and environmental factors and overweight or obesity(Reference Humenikova and Gates1, Reference Parízkóva2), although several studies from other countries have shown evidence of relations between these factors and overweight/obesity(3–Reference Rennie, Johnson and Jebb6).
In order to inform obesity prevention strategies among Czech Republic adolescents, there is a need for data on the prevalence of overweight and obesity and, equally important, insight into the relationship between energy balance-related behaviours and environmental factors on overweight and obesity in this country.
Therefore, the aim of the present study is 2-fold: (i) What was the prevalence of having a normal weight, being overweight and being obese (by using cut-off points of the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF)(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal7) among 10–18-year-old Czech Republic adolescents? (ii) How were diet and (in)activity behaviours associated with being overweight/obese?
Methods
Design and participants
Cross-sectional data from ‘The 6th Nation-wide Anthropological Survey of Children and Adolescents 2001 Czech Republic’ have been used(Reference Kobzová, Vignerová and Bláha8). A total of 281 schools from all over the country participated in this survey and were randomly recruited. Informed consent of parents was obtained before enrolment in the survey. Objective anthropometric measurements (height and weight) were collected by trained physical education teachers and pre-graduate students in Anthropology. Data on the behavioural aspects of adolescents were collected by means of questionnaires filled in by the adolescents under the guidance of their teacher during class hours. In addition, the adolescents brought a parent questionnaire home to be filled in by one or both of their parents(Reference Kobzová, Vignerová and Bláha8). Data of 31 228 adolescents in the age group of 10–18 years were included in the present study.
Measurements
Based on the height and weight of adolescents, BMI was calculated using age- and gender-specific cut-off points from the IOTF(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal7). The adolescents’ questionnaire further contained questions on television (TV) viewing and use of the personal computer (PC) with answer possibilities ranging ‘0–3 h’, ‘4–7 h’, ‘8–14 h’ and ‘more than 14 h’ a week. TV viewing was later dichotomized into ‘up to 7 h a week’ and ‘more than 7 h a week’, while PC use was dichotomized into ‘up to 3 h’ and ‘more than 3 h’ a week. The amount of physical activity was assessed by estimating the amount of hours being physically active in a week and was later dichotomized as ‘up to 7 h a week’ and ‘more than 7 h a week’. Daily consumption of meals was assessed with questions on breakfast, mid-morning snack, lunch, afternoon snack and something besides these meals. These questions could be answered by ‘yes’ or ‘no’. In addition, being on a diet (‘yes’/‘no’) and monitoring weight (‘yes’/‘no’) were also assessed.
The parents’ questionnaires contained questions on self-reported height and weight of both the father and the mother, education of both parents (elementary school, apprenticeship, secondary school and university graduate), size of the residence they lived in (up to 5000, up to 10 000, up to 100 000, up to 1 000 000 and more than 1 000 000 inhabitants), birth weight and height of the child, whether the child had been breast-fed (not breast-fed, up to 1 month, up to 3 months, up to 6 months and more than 6 months), number of children in the family and if the child was pre-pubescent or pubescent (‘before voice breaking’ or ‘after voice breaking’ and for girls ‘before menarche’ or ‘after menarche’).
Based on their self-reported height and weight, BMI values of both parents were calculated. Normal weight was defined as BMI <25 kg/m2, overweight as BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and obese as BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Parental BMI was then divided into three groups (‘both parents normal weight’, ‘one parent overweight or obese’ and ‘both parents overweight or obese’). Education of the parents was also divided into three groups (‘both parents lower education’, ‘one parent higher education’ and ‘both parents higher education’). Lower education contained ‘elementary school’, ‘elementary school’ and ‘apprenticeship’ and higher education contained ‘secondary school’, ‘secondary school’ and ‘university graduation’.
Size of residence was dichotomized in ‘up to 10 000 inhabitants’ and ‘more than 10 000 inhabitants’. Breast-feeding was subdivided into three categories (not breast-fed, up to 3 months and more than 3 months). Finally, the number of children in the family was dichotomized as ‘up to two children in the family’ and ‘more than two children in the family’.
Statistical analysis
First, χ 2 and univariate ANOVA tests were used to assess differences in energy balance-related behaviours and background variables among the three weight groups (normal weight, overweight and obese) and to test differences between both genders within each weight group. Each factor was analysed separately among the three weight groups and between genders within weight groups. Second, Spearman–Pearson correlations among all variables were computed to assess unadjusted correlations between independent variables, to check for possible multi-collinearity, and between independent variables and BMI. An intercorrelation of 0·50 was allowed as a maximum correlation between two independent variables(Reference Miles and Shevlin9).
To assess associations between behaviours and being overweight/obese, stepwise multi-level logistic regression models were run on dichotomized BMI (normal weight v. overweight/obese), accounting for the clustering of individuals within schools.
First, each behavioural factor (i.e. physical activity, TV viewing, PC use, breakfast, lunch, mid-morning snack, afternoon snack, besides meals snack, monitoring weight and dieting) was separately regressed on the outcome measure. The second model contained all the behavioural factors, and birth weight, puberty, BMI of the parents, education of the parents, number of children in the family, breast-feeding and the number of inhabitants the child lives with since previous studies have shown that these factors are related to BMI(Reference Rennie, Johnson and Jebb6, Reference Toschke, Vignerová and Lbotska10). Both models were adjusted for age and school, and were tested separately for boys and girls and two age groups: 10–14 and 15–18 years. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences statistical software package version 15·0·1 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and MLwiN version 2·12(Reference Rasbash, Charlton and Browne11). A statistical significance level of P < 0·01 was used for differences in all independent variables within the three body weight groups and between both genders. For multi-level logistic regression models, P < 0·05 (two-sided) was considered statistically significant.
Non-respondents
Adolescents were excluded from logistic regression models when having missing data on any of the energy-balanced behavioural factors or background factors (n 19 716). Logistic regression analysis was performed to check for differences in age, gender and BMI between included and excluded adolescents.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
Table 1 shows the prevalence of having a normal weight, being overweight and being obese in boys and girls of all ages. Statistically significant differences between boys and girls on BMI were found, with more boys being overweight or obese than girls (P < 0·01). Lower prevalence of overweight and obesity was found when age was higher.
IOTF = International Obesity Task Force.
Percentages were count within rows.
Dropout analysis showed that the adolescents who were excluded from the logistic regression analysis were more often boys (OR = 0·91, 95 % CI 0·87, 0·96), older (OR = 1·02, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·03) and overweight (OR = 1·26, 95 % CI 1·16, 1·36) or obese (OR = 1·64, 95 % CI 1·36, 1·98) compared to the adolescents who were included in the analysis (data not shown).
As Table 2 shows, ‘obese’ adolescents were more likely to be younger (P < 0·001) and less likely to be breast-fed for more than 3 months (P < 0·001), had more often parents who were both overweight/obese (P < 0·001) or who both completed lower education (P < 0·001), were more likely to come from small residences (up to 10 000 inhabitants; P < 0·001), skipped a meal more often (P < 0·001) and were more often on a diet (P < 0·001) than their overweight or normal weight peers.
IOTF, International Obesity Task Force.
Percentages were counted by categorized BMI and within sex.
*Statistical significance of <0·01 on categorized BMI, performed with one-way ANOVA or χ 2 test.
†Statistical significance of <0·01 between sex in each BMI group, performed with one-way ANOVA or χ 2 test.
Overweight adolescents were more likely to come from small residences (P < 0·001) than normal-weight adolescents. Overweight adolescents skipped meals more often and were on a diet more often than normal-weight adolescents, but less often than obese adolescents (both P < 0·001).
Normal-weight adolescents were older (P < 0·001), more likely to live in large residences (P < 0·001) and less likely to be pre-pubescent (P < 0·001), more often had parents who both completed higher education (P < 0·001), were more often >7 h physically active in a week (P < 0·01), were more likely to spend >3 h a week behind the computer than overweight or obese adolescents (P < 0·01) and less likely to skip a meal (P < 0·001) or be on a diet (P < 0·001) in comparison with overweight or obese adolescents.
Gender differences were found within the three weight groups. Normal weight and overweight boys were more likely to be pre-pubescent (both P < 0·001) and have parents who had both completed higher education (both P < 0·001) than normal-weight and overweight girls. In every weight group, boys were more physically active (P < 0·001), used the PC more often (P < 0·001) and watched more TV (P < 0·001) than girls, while more girls than boys were on a diet (P < 0·01). Normal-weight and overweight girls more often skipped a meal (P < 0·01) and were more likely to monitor their weight than normal-weight and overweight boys (P < 0·001). Intercorrelations among all independent variables were below 0·50 and most variables were significantly correlated to BMI.
Associations between energy balance-related behaviours and being overweight or obese
All multi-level logistic regression analyses were first analysed naïve, without school. Adding school as a clustering variable to the model hardly changed the odds ratios. Further, adding behavioural variables to the model led to an overall decreased number of factors that were statistically significantly associated with being overweight or obese. Therefore, only adjusted odds ratios are shown in Table 3 and results of the final models (step 2, Table 3) are described below.
IOTF, International Obesity Task Force; Ref., reference category. Bold values are significantly different from 1 (P < 0.05).
‡Crude model with each behavioural factor analysed separately on BMI, adjusted for school and age.
§Adjusted model with all behavioural factors included in analyses on BMI, adjusted for school, age, birth weight, breast-feeding, puberty, parents’ BMI, parents’ education, number of inhabitants and family size.
||‘Yes’ is reference category v. ‘no’.
¶‘No’ is reference category v. ‘yes’.
Among boys in both age groups, the risk for being overweight/obese was associated with not having consumed an afternoon snack (10–14-year-olds: OR = 1·43, 95 % CI 1·11, 1·84, 15–18-year-olds: OR = 1·56, 95 % CI 1·14, 2·15) and skipping a besides meal snack (10–14-year-olds: OR = 1·41, 95 % CI 1·12, 1·77, 15–18-year-olds: OR = 1·71, 95 % CI 1·27, 2·28). Slightly higher odds were found in 15–18-year-old boys than in 10–14-year-old boys. Dieting (OR = 4·60, 95 % CI 3·12, 6·78) was positively associated with overweight/obesity in 10–14-year-old boys. Among the older boys, dieting was no longer significantly associated with being overweight/obese, after adjusting for energy balance-related behaviours and background factors. Being physically active for >7 h/week (OR = 0·74, 95 % CI 0·59, 0·93) showed an inverse relationship with overweight/obesity in 10–14-year-old boys. Skipping breakfast (OR = 1·33, 95 % CI 1·04, 1·70) was associated with an increased risk for being overweight/obese in 10–14-year-old boys, but no longer among 15–18-year-old boys after adding behavioural factors and background factors in the model (step 2). Skipping lunch (OR = 1·65, 95 % CI 1·18, 2·30) and skipping a mid-morning snack (OR = 1·76, 95 % CI 1·25, 2·50) were positively related to overweight/obesity in 15–18-year-old boys, and watching TV for >7 h/week (OR = 0·69, 95 % CI 0·51, 0·92) showed an inverse relation with overweight/obesity.
Among girls, dieting (10–14-year-olds: OR = 2·75, 95 % CI 2·03, 3·71; 15–18-year-olds: OR = 2·87, 95 % CI 2·09, 3·95) was positively associated with being overweight/obese in both age groups, with slightly higher odds among the older girls. The 10–14-year-old girls further showed positive associations on being overweight/obese when skipping an afternoon snack (OR = 1·34, 95 % CI 1·03, 1·75) and when not having a besides meals snack (OR = 1·46, 95 % CI 1·14, 1·86). These relations were not found in 15–18-year-old girls. However, among these girls, skipping lunch (OR = 1·49, 95 % CI 1·13, 1·97) and watching TV for >7 h/week (OR = 1·34, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·76) were positively associated with being overweight/obese. Negative associations were also found in 15–18-year-old girls for monitoring weight (OR = 0·68, 95 % CI 0·51, 0·92) and being overweight/obese.
When comparing the ‘youngest’ boys and girls, not having an afternoon snack or a besides meal snack and dieting were positively associated with being overweight/obese between both genders. It was only among boys that inverse associations with being overweight/obese were found when being highly physically active for >7 h/week. In addition, skipping breakfast was also found to be positively associated with being overweight/obese in boys.
Among the ‘oldest’ groups, skipping lunch was found to be positively associated with being overweight/obese between both genders. Boys further showed positive associations with overweight/obesity when skipping other meals like mid-morning snack, afternoon snack and besides meals snack. It was only among girls that dieting and watching TV for >7 h/ week were positively associated with being overweight/obese. For boys, negative associations with a high amount of TV viewing (>7 h/week) on being overweight/obese were found. Negative associations on overweight/obesity were also found among girls with monitoring of their weight.
In addition to the multi-level logistic regression models, multinomial regression models were run to be able to compare the three weight groups. Comparable results were found for overweight boys and girls. Higher risks for being ‘obese’ were found in boys and girls when they reported being on a diet and when they skipped a besides meals snack. Among boys, skipping an afternoon snack was also positively associated with being obese (data not shown).
Discussion
The aim of the present study was to assess prevalence of normal weight, overweight or being obese among 10–18-year-old Czech Republic adolescents and to research which associations were being found between energy balance-related behaviours and overweight/obesity among these adolescents.
Czech Republic adolescent boys were shown to have a somewhat higher prevalence of overweight and obesity than girls, independent of age. Prevalence of overweight varied between 6·1 % and 16·7 % and that for obesity between 0·7 % and 3·7 %. Other studies found similar results among European adolescents within the same age range(Reference Janssen, Katzmarzyk and Boyce12).
Most of the behavioural factors were independently statistically significantly associated with being overweight/obese. This mostly changed when adding all behavioural factors and background factors together in the model and suggested an overlap among factors, although intercorrelations were below 0·50.
Positive associations of dieting, high amount of watching TV and skipping meals on being overweight/obese, and negative associations of high physical activity and monitoring weight on being overweight/obese were found in the present study. Similar results were found in other studies and reviews(Reference Rennie, Johnson and Jebb6, Reference Sweeting13–Reference Zaborskis, Petronyte and Sumskas19). With regard to dieting and skipping meals, contradictory results have been found in the literature. The presence of reverse causality has been indicated, with dieting and skipping meals as the consequences of being overweight/obese(Reference Newby15), while other research suggests a causal relationship between skipping a meal and becoming overweight or obese. Under-reporting of daily consumption of meals might also be a factor of the positive association between skipping meals and overweight/obesity(Reference Rennie, Johnson and Jebb6). Since the present data are cross-sectional, the direction of the relationship regarding dieting and skipping meals cannot be estimated.
The effect of school as a clustering variable was minor in the present study. Yet intervention studies and randomized controlled trials on behaviours for preventing and treating overweight and obesity have shown a school effect(Reference Oude Luttikhuis, Baur and Jansen20, Reference Veugelers and Fitzgerald21), which suggests that future prevention strategies might include school policy and neighbourhood components(Reference Harrington and Elliot22, Reference Kumanyika, Obarzanek and Stettler23).
A surprising finding in our study was an inverse association of high amounts of watching TV with being overweight/obese in older boys. This is in contrast with findings from the literature. A possible explanation could be that under-reporting in overweight/obese boys was present, which led to statistically significant negative associations in the non-overweight/obese boys.
Strengths and limitations
The present study has some strengths and limitations. The strength of the present study is that BMI was calculated with objectively measured height and weight. Objectively measured height and weight, instead of self-reported height and weight, are more accurate since self-reporting, especially in children and adolescents, could lead to biased results. Another strength is the use of internationally accepted gender- and age-specific cut-off values(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal7), which enables comparison with similar studies performed in other countries.
The large sample size can also be considered a strength of the present study. It implicates that precautions should be taken when interpreting results from the analyses. Statistical significance is highly likely in the present study. We therefore chose to use a P value of 0·01 when assessing associations with energy balance-related behaviours and background factors on normal weight, overweight and being obese. Moreover, when performing multi-level logistic regression analysis, the total sample was clustered for school and divided into four groups based on age and gender, resulting in moderate sample sizes. Possible hierarchical structures in the data have been taken into account by performing multi-level modelling. In addition, the analysis in four groups takes possible different patterns in behaviours between age and gender into account, which are shown in the results of the present study. Moreover, multinomial regression analyses, which were performed in addition to assess associations of behaviours with being overweight or obese, showed similar findings.
A large number of schools from all over the country were included. We therefore believe that this sample is representative, although dropout analysis revealed that overweight and obese adolescents dropped out more often.
A weakness of the present study is that the parents’ and children’s questionnaires were not pre-tested, resulting in lack of information on validity and reliability. Further, behavioural and background variables consisted of self-reported single-item questions. This could have led to under- or over-reporting or interpretation inaccuracies between the different ages.
For analysing the possible associations between behavioural factors and BMI, cross-sectional data from the Czech Republic has been used. Associations between the behaviours and being overweight/obese should therefore be carefully interpreted.
The present data were collected in 2001. The prevalence of overweight and obesity should be monitored more often to observe and measure the effectiveness of national prevention strategies.
The results of the present study provide information on the prevalence and associations of energy balance-related behaviours on overweight and obesity in a country where not much information on this topic is as yet present. Moreover, finding literature on intervention studies for preventing overweight and obesity, performed in this country, was difficult. Therefore, results from the present study are important for emphasizing the obesity problem and the need for executing (intervention) studies on overweight and obesity in the Czech Republic.
To conclude, the present study revealed that skipping a meal, independent of the main meal or snack and dieting are associated with being overweight or obese in Czech Republic adolescents, independent of gender. In the future, the results of the present study can be useful when performing overweight and obesity prevention programmes in the Czech Republic. However, more preferably, longitudinal, national studies using better behavioural measures are needed. Additional measures combining a multi-level approach within the adolescents’ environment should be investigated for making future interventions successful.
Acknowledgements
Sources of funding: The present paper has been facilitated by the EU-funded HOPE project: Health Promotion through Obesity Prevention across Europe (the Commission of the European Communities, SP5A-CT-2006-044128). The study does not necessarily reflect the Commission’s views and in no way anticipates the Commission’s future policy in this area. The data collection was supported by the Internal Grant Agency of MH, Czech Republic, Grant no. NJ/6792-3 (The 6th Nation-wide Anthropological Survey of Children and Adolescents 2001, Czech Republic). Conflicts of interest declaration: There are no conflicts of interest to be declared. Author contributions: The authors participated in the following ways: L.d.G., N.L. and M.W. conceptualized the study questions. J.V. provided the data on adolescents in the Czech Republic. L.d.G. conducted the analyses and prepared the manuscript with the help of M.W., K.I.K., N.L., I.S. and M.W. provided statistical expertise. All co-authors made contributions in refining the manuscript drafts. M.W. provided overall guidance in data analysis and interpretation and writing of the manuscript.