Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:12:42.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are green caterers more likely to serve healthy meals than non-green caterers? Results from a quantitative study in Danish worksite catering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

BE Mikkelsen ,
M Bruselius-Jensen ,
JS Andersen  and
A Lassen
BE Mikkelsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Mørkhøj Bygade 19, DK-2860 Søborg, Denmark
M Bruselius-Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Mørkhøj Bygade 19, DK-2860 Søborg, Denmark
JS Andersen
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Risk Assessment, Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Søborg, Denmark
A Lassen
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Danish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Mørkhøj Bygade 19, DK-2860 Søborg, Denmark
*
*corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

The present study aimed to investigate whether organic conversion in catering has positive effects on the nutritional quality of menus offered.

Design

The methodology was based on a self-administered questionnaire. The self-declared priority given to the use of organic foods was measured as the basis for assigning catering managers to one of two groups: ‘green’ or ‘non-green’ caterers. These groups were then compared with regard to the relative nutritional quality of the menu options offered to customers.

Setting

The study was carried out among randomly selected Danish worksite catering outlets.

Subjects

The subjects participating in the study comprised 526 Danish worksite catering managers.

Results

The results showed a strong correlation between caterers' ‘green-ness’ and the nutritional quality of the menu options offered. Green caters had more healthy options in their menus than non-green caters, which is likely to result in improved nutritional quality of the diets of end consumers. The reason for this may partly be the increased service training efforts that green caterers practise in order to be able to implement organic foods successfully. It may also be associated with the fact that the price premiums and availability of the organic products forces caterers to serve menus with higher amounts of root and non-green leafy vegetables, pulses and seasonal vegetables.

Conclusion

The present findings suggest that organic conversion of public canteens may be a good opportunity to promote healthier eating in public catering.

Keywords

CateringHealthy eatingOrganic foodsWorksite
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , October 2006 , pp. 846 - 850
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1European Commission. Action Plan for Organic Food and Farming. Brussels: European Commission, 2004.Google Scholar
2Beckmann, S. ØKO foods revisited – Danish consumers' demand for organic food at the turn of the century. In: Farhangmehr, M, ed. Proceedings of the 31st EMAC Conference. University of Minho, Braga, 2002.Google Scholar
3Torjusen, H, Sangstad, L, O'Doherty, JK, Kjærnes, U. European Consumers' Conceptions of Organic Food: A Review of Available Research Professional Report No. 4. Oslo: National Institute for Consumer Research, 2004.Google Scholar
4Agence Francaise de Sanite et Securite Alimentaire. Evaluation des risques et bénéfices nutritionnels et sanitaires des alimints issus de l'agriculture biologique. Paris: Agence Francaise de Sanite et Securite Alimentaire, 2003.Google Scholar
5Soil Association. Organic Farming, Food Quality and Human Health. Bristol: Soil Association, 2002.Google Scholar
6O'Doherty Jensen, K, Larsen, HN, Mølgård, JP, Andersen, JO, Marckmann, P, et al. Organic Food and Human Health. Frederiksberg: Research Institute for Human Nutrition, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 2001 [available in Danish only].Google Scholar
7Laberenz, H, Naatz, OW. Biogerichte in Betriebsrestaurants. Ökologie und Landbau 2000; 113: 39–40.Google Scholar
8Mikkelsen, BE, Kristensen, NH, Nielsen, T. Organic Foods in Catering – The Nordic Perspective. Søborg: Veterinary and Food Administration, 2002.Google Scholar
9Spiller, A, Lüth, M, Enneking, U. Chancen und Potenziale von Öko-Lebensmitteln in der Außer-Haus-Verpflegung am Beispiel der Verzehrgewohnheiten von Mensa- und Kantinenbesuchern. Göttingen: Institut für Agrarökonomie, Lehrstuhl Marketing für Lebensmittel und Agrarprodukte, Georg August Universität, 2003.Google Scholar
10Rimmington, M. Organic food – too good to eat? Hospitality Review 2003; 5: 13–8.Google Scholar
11Nielsen, T, Kristensen, NH, Mikkelsen, BE. Use of Organic Foods in Municipalities and Counties. Søborg: Veterinary and Food Administration, 2002 [available in Danish only].Google Scholar
12Mikkelsen, BE, Pedersen, TT, Therkildsen, KN. A Lot More than Organic Foods – A Study of Motives and Effects of Organic Change Processes in Day Care Institutions. Søborg: Danish Institute for Veterinary and Food Research, 2004 [available in Danish only].Google Scholar
13Rech, T. Organic Food for Public Institutions. Organic Agriculture, Sustainability, Markets and Policies. Report from a Workshop on Organic Agriculture. Washington, DC: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003; 401–40.Google Scholar
14Benjamini, Y, Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 1995; 57: 289–300.Google Scholar
15Guilland, A. Nutrient based quality control in public catering: need for revision. Journal of Food Engineering 2003; 56: 189–93.Google Scholar
16European Commission. Health and Human Nutrition – Element for European Action. Brussels: Société Francaise De Santé Publique/Présidence Francaise de l'Union Européenne/DG SANCO Health and Consumer Protection, 2000.Google Scholar
17Hamm, U, Gronenfeld, F. The European Market for Organic Food: Revised and Updated Analysis. Aberystwyth: University of Wales, School of Management and Business, 2004.Google Scholar
18Agger, AB, Hansen, TB, Leth, KD, Mundt, P, Sørensen, L. Report on a Sustainable Food Development Project in Western Zealand Hospital. Valby: Aggers selskab, 2004 [available in Danish only].Google Scholar
19Mikkelsen, BE, Elle, JC. Bericht aus Dänemark – Grosse küchen, grossen möchlichkeiten. Ökologie und Landbau 2005; 136: 42–4.Google Scholar
20Mikkelsen, BE, Kristensen, NH, Nielsen, T. Change processes in large scale public catering – case findings from implementation of organic foods in a Danish county. Foodservice Business Research 2005; 8: 87–105.Google Scholar
21Holler, CMachbarkeitsstudie zur Maximierung des Einsatzes biologischer Lebensmittel in Großküchen. Salzburg: Umwelt Land Salzburg, 2001.Google Scholar
22Lindeskog, P. Food and environment in Stockholm county – eat smart. Presentation at Workshop on Public Organic Food, 13 October. Aas: Norwegian Food Research Institute, 2005. Also available at http://www.healthcat.net/Default.asp?m=8.Google Scholar
23Solemdal, L. A national pilot project on organic foods in large scale catering at St. Olavs Hospital in Trondheim [available in Norwegian only]. Presentation at Workshop on Public Organic Food, 13 October. Aas: Norwegian Food Research Institute, 2005. Also available at http://www.healthcat.net/Default.asp?m=8.Google Scholar
24Direktoratet For Fødevare Erhverv. Evaluation of the Grant Scheme Green Purchasing. Copenhagen: Directorate for AgriBusiness, 2004; [available in Danish only].Google Scholar
25Mikkelsen, BE, Bruselius-Jensen, M. Better nutrition in organic catering than in conventional? Programme and Abstracts of the 8th Nordic Nutrition Conference, 20–23 June. Tønsberg: University of Oslo, 2004.Google Scholar
26Rasmussen, SW, Mikkelsen, BE. Is public organic food healthier? Ernærings- og husholdningsøkonomen [The Home Economist] 2003; 8: 12–5 [available in Danish only].Google Scholar