Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:44:55.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropometry and body composition of south Indian babies at birth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

S Muthayya ,
P Dwarkanath ,
T Thomas ,
M Vaz ,
A Mhaskar ,
R Mhaskar ,
A Thomas ,
S Bhat  and
AV Kurpad
S Muthayya*
Affiliation:
Institute of Population Health and Clinical Research, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, 560 034, India
P Dwarkanath
Affiliation:
Institute of Population Health and Clinical Research, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, 560 034, India
T Thomas
Affiliation:
Institute of Population Health and Clinical Research, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, 560 034, India
M Vaz
Affiliation:
Institute of Population Health and Clinical Research, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, 560 034, India
A Mhaskar
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India
R Mhaskar
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India
A Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India
S Bhat
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India
AV Kurpad
Affiliation:
Institute of Population Health and Clinical Research, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bangalore, 560 034, India
*
*corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

To assess the consequences on body composition of increasing birth weight in Indian babies in relation to reported values in Western babies, and to assess the relationship between maternal and neonatal anthropometry and body composition.

Design

Prospective observational study.

Setting

Bangalore City, India.

Subjects

A total of 712 women were recruited at 12.5±3.1 weeks of gestation (mean±standard deviation, SD) and followed up until delivery; 14.5% were lost to follow-up. Maternal body weight, height, mid upper-arm circumference and skinfold thicknesses were measured at recruitment. Weight and body composition of the baby (skinfold thicknesses, mid upper-arm circumference, derived arm fat index and arm muscle index; AFI and AMI, respectively) were measured at birth in hospital.

Results

The mean±SD birth weight of all newborns was 2.80±0.44 kg. Birth weight was significantly related to the triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness of the baby. In a small number of babies with large birth weight for gestational age, there was a relatively higher normalised AFI relative to AMI than for babies with lower or appropriate birth weight for gestational age. Maternal height and fat-free mass were significantly associated with the baby's length at birth.

Conclusions

Skinfold thicknesses in Indian babies were similar to those reported in a Western population with comparable birth weights, and the relationship of AFI to birth weight appeared to be steeper in Indian babies. Thus, measures to increase birth weight in Indian babies should take into account possible adverse consequences on body composition. There were no significant relationships between maternal anthropometry and body composition at birth on multivariate analysis, except for sum of the baby's skinfold thicknesses and maternal fat-free mass (P<0.02).

Keywords

Birth weightBody compositionSmall for gestational ageAdequate for gestational ageLarge for gestational ageInfants
Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , October 2006 , pp. 896 - 903
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1Chhabra, P, Sharma, AK, Grover, VL, Aggarwal, OP. Prevalence of low birth weight and its determinants in an urban resettlement area of Delhi. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 2004; 16: 95–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bang, AT, Reddy, HM, Bang, RA, Deshmukh, MD. Why do neonates die in rural Gadchiroli, India? (Part II): estimating population attributable risks and contribution of multiple morbidities for identifying a strategy to prevent deaths. Journal of Perinatology 2005; 25(Suppl. 1): S35–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Hales, CN, Barker, DJP, Clark, PMS, Cox, LJ, Fall, C, Osmond, C, Winter, PD. Fetal and infant growth and impaired glucose tolerance at age 64. British Medical Journal 1991; 303: 1019–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Yajnik, CS, Lubree, HG, Rege, SS, Naik, SS, Deshpande, JA, Deshpande, SS, et al. Adiposity and hyperinsulinemia in Indians are present at birth. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2002; 87: 5575–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Yajnik, CS, Fall, CHD, Coyaji, KJ, Hirve, SS, Rao, SS, Barker, DJP, et al. Neonatal anthropometry: the thin–fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2003; 27: 173–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Krishnaveni, GV, Hill, JC, Veena, SR, Leary, SD, Saperia, J, Chachyamma, KJ, et al. Truncal adiposity is present at birth and in early childhood in south Indian children. Indian Pediatrics 2005; 42: 527–38.Google ScholarPubMed
7Dudeja, V, Misra, A, Pandey, RM, Devina, G, Kumar, G, Vikram, NK. BMI does not accurately predict overweight in Asian Indians in northern India. British Journal of Nutrition 2001; 86: 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body mass index for Asian populations and its implication for policy and implementation strategies. Lancet 2004; 363: 157–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9World Health Organization (WHO). Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series No. 854. Geneva: WHO, 1995.Google Scholar
10Koo, WW, Walters, JC, Hockman, EM. Body composition in neonates: relationship between measured and derived anthropometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements. Pediatric Research 2004; 56: 694–700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Dela, F, Larsen, JJ, Mikines, KJ, Ploug, T, Petersen, LN, Galbo, H. Insulin stimulated muscle glucose clearance in patients with NIDDM. Effects of one legged physical training. Diabetes 1995; 44: 1010–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Ebeling, P, Bourey, R, Koranyi, L, Tuominen, JA, Groop, LC, Henriksson, J, et al. Mechanism of enhanced insulin sensitivity in athletes. Increased blood flow, muscle glucose transport protein (glut-4) concentrations and glycogen synthase activity. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1993; 92: 1623–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Houmard, JA, Egan, PC, Neufer, PD, Friedman, JE, Wheeler, WS, Israel, RG, et al. Elevated skeletal muscle glucose transporter levels in exercise-trained middle aged men. American Journal of Physiology 1991; 261: E437–43.Google ScholarPubMed
14Poehlman, ET, Dvorak, RV, DeNino, WF, Brochu, M, Ades, PA. Effects of resistance training and endurance training on insulin sensitivity in nonobese, young women: a controlled randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000; 85: 2463–8.Google ScholarPubMed
15Chowdhury, B, Lantz, H, Sjostrom, L. Computed tomography-determined body composition in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in Indian and matched Swedish males. Metabolism 1996; 45: 634–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Lee, RC, Wang, Z, Heo, M, Ross, R, Janssen, I, Heymsfield, SB. Total body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross validation of anthropometric prediction models. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 72: 796–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Song, M-Y, Kim, J, Horlick, M, Wang, J, Pierson, RN Jr, Moonseong, H, et al. Prepubertal Asians have less limb skeletal muscle. Journal of Applied Physiology 2002; 92: 2285–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Kurpad, AV, Regan, MM, Raj, T, Vasudevan, J, Kuriyan, R, Gnanou, J, et al. Lysine requirement of chronically undernourished adult Indian subjects, measured by the 24h indicator amino acid oxidation and balance technique. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 77: 101–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Hediger, ML, Overpeck, MD, Kuczmarski, RJ, McGlynn, A, Maurer, KR, Davis, WW. Muscularity and fatness of infants and young children born small- or large-for-gestational-age. Pediatrics 1998; 102: E60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Phillips, DI. Relation of fetal growth to adult muscle mass and glucose tolerance. Diabetic Medicine 1995; 12: 686–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Durnin, JVGA, Womersley, J. Estimates of total body fat from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition 1974; 32: 77–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Brenner, WE, Edelman, DA, Hendricks, CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1976; 126: 555–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Pereira-da-Silva, L, Gomes, JV, Clington, A, Videira-Amaral, JM, Bustamante, SA. Upper arm measurements of healthy neonates comparing ultrasonography and anthropometric methods. Early Human Development 1999; 54: 117–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Barker, DJP. Mothers, Babies, and Health in Later Life, 2nd ed. Edinburgh/New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1998.Google Scholar
25Mi, J, Law, C, Zhang, K, Osmond, C, Stein, C, Barker, D. Effects of infant birthweight and maternal body mass index in pregnancy on components of the insulin resistance syndrome in China. Annals of Internal Medicine 2000; 132: 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Bhat, DS, Yajnik, CS, Sayyad, MG, Raut, KN, Lubree, HG, Rege, SS. Body fat measurement in Indian men: comparison of three methods based on a two-compartment model. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2005; 29: 842–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Lohman, TG, Roche, AF, Martorell, R. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
28Bavdekar, A, Yajnik, CS, Fall, CHD, Bapat, S, Pandit, AN, Deshpande, V. Insulin resistance syndrome in 8-year-old Indian children: small at birth, big at 8 years, or both? Diabetes 1999; 48: 2422–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Rao, S, Yajnik, CS, Kanade, A, Fall, CH, Margetts, BM, Jackson, AA. Intake of micronutrient-rich foods in rural Indian mothers is associated with the size of their babies at birth: Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Journal of Nutrition 2001; 131: 1217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Yajnik, CS. Early life origins of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in India and other Asian countries. Journal of Nutrition 2004; 134: 205–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Muthayya, S, Kurpad, AV, Duggan, CP, Bosch, RJ, Dwarkanath, P, Mhaskar, A. Maternal vitamin B 12 status is a risk factor for intrauterine growth retardation in south Indians. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2006; 01 11; [Epub ahead of print].CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed