Sports foods supplements
Ergogenic aids refer to the application of any method or manoeuvre to improve the ability to carry out a certain physical work or sports performance(Reference Palacios Gil de Antuñano and Manonelles Marqueta1). Among the ergogenic aids, different types can be differentiated: mechanical, physiological, pharmacological, psychological and nutritional(Reference Moriones and Santos2). Ergonomic aids or sports foods supplements are, according to the International Olympic Committee (IOC), ‘a food, component, nutrient or non-food component that is purposely ingested within the normal diet with the aim of obtaining a determined effect on health or performance’(Reference Maughan, Burke and Dvorak3). Currently, they are used by a large portion of athletes, both professional and amateur, to improve their performance(Reference Maughan, Greenhaff and Hespel4). These substances are consumed due to the existence of competitions in which athletes aim to achieve certain objectives related to sports performance(Reference Maughan, Burke and Dvorak3).
Sports food supplements: scientific evidence and legislation
Although a multitude of sports foods supplements are currently marketed, studies on their effects highlight that scientific evidence showing that they promote health benefits or improve the sports performance of the athlete is only available for a few of them(Reference Garthe and Maughan5). Creatine, caffeine, bicarbonate, β-alanine, carbohydrates and proteins are the sports food supplements that stand out due to the high number of studies documenting their effects, both through laboratory research and the positive response of athletes(Reference Maughan, Greenhaff and Hespel4,Reference Trexler and Smith-Ryan6) . Scientific organisations and public institutions such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) have previously studied the characteristics of the different substances added to or isolated from supplements, as well as the safety of their consumption; among these substances, creatine monohydrate (CM) stands out(7).
In addition to the importance of scientific evidence for the approval of the consumption of a certain sports supplement, the presence of legislation that regulates the marketing and advertising of products aimed at the consumer must also be highlighted. At the European level, sports food supplements, such as CM, are covered by Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 regarding nutritional and health claims for food; Regulation (EU) nº 1169/2011 on food information provided to the consumer; Regulation (EC) 258/97 on novel foods and novel food ingredients and Directive 2002/46 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States regarding food supplements(Reference Martínez-Sanz, Sospedra and Baladía9).
Creatine monohydrate
Creatine is a nitrogenous compound that is available from various foods in a normal diet, and it serves as an energy substrate for skeletal muscle contraction. The intention of supplementation with this substance is to increase the levels of phosphocreatine at rest, as well as those of free creatine, with the aim of reducing muscle fatigue, which is important in the search for better results in sporting events(Reference Kreider, Kalman and Antonio10). Muscle creatine concentrations are increased by 20 % with CM supplementation(Reference Butts, Jacobs and Silvis11). These supplements increase lean body mass, as well as strength, power and effectiveness in short-duration, high-intensity exercises(Reference Burke12). The increase in body mass may be a result of the increase in intracellular water related to the osmotic properties of creatine(Reference Rawson, Miles and Larson-Meyer13). Studies on CM supplementation have shown short-duration improvements in sports performance and strength: specifically, in maximum-intensity exercises, muscle power, number of repetitions, muscle endurance, speed and total strength(Reference Kreider, Kalman and Antonio10).
The use of CM can yield increases in power during short sprints of maximum intensity, which can be even more evident when repeated sprints are accompanied by short recovery periods. Furthermore, with CM supplementation, effects are also observed in muscle glycogen stores(Reference Rawson, Miles and Larson-Meyer13). This is important because the availability of muscle glycogen is the main determinant of sports performance in resistance exercises, and its depletion can lead to muscle fatigue(Reference Maughan, Greenhaff and Hespel4). In addition, CM is one of the few sports foods supplements or ergonomic aids with health claims authorised by the EFSA and the European Commission (EC), due to its evident effects on the health and sports performance of athletes(Reference Almonacid Fierro and Urzua Alul14). The approved health claims are ‘Creatine increases physical performance in repeated bursts of high-intensity exercise in the short term’ and ‘Daily consumption of Creatine may improve the effect of resistance training on muscle strength in adults over 55 years of age’. These health claims refer to the 3-g dose of CM(15). There are also other institutions that describe the use of sports foods supplements, such as the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND)(Reference Thomas, Erdman and Burke16), based on the evidence studied by Tarnopolsky(Reference Tarnopolsky17) and the IOC(Reference Maughan, Burke and Dvorak3).
These health claims occupy a pivotal position in the marketing of the product, both in its labelling and in the advertising of the product intended for athletes(Reference Rao and Wang18). There have been cases in which the health claims did not fully match the accurate descriptions of the effects that sports foods supplements produce on the health of users who consume them(Reference Hoffmann and Schwartz19). Therefore, the aims of this study are to describe the health claims for CM present in commercial messages for a sample of sports foods supplements and to verify the adequacy of these health claims according to current European regulations.
Methods
To achieve the proposed aims, we carried out a descriptive study to analyse the contents of the different health claims included in the commercial communications of a sample of sports foods supplements, by analysing these claims in light of current legislation and scientific evidence in this area.
First, we have performed a review of the current legislation and scientific evidence in this area. Second, we analysed the contents of the different health claims included in the commercial communications of a sample of CM supplements. Lastly, we observed if the health claims were in compliance with current European legislation and the review of research studies.
Population selection strategy
The search for the sample products was carried out in April 2019, through the Amazon and Google Shopping web portals. The term ‘Creatine Monohydrate’ was introduced and filtered by country or European region to carry out the search process to obtain results for sports foods supplements containing this substance.
Once the sample had been obtained, the investigation was redirected towards each of the web portals of the selected supplement brands (company’s website) in order to assemble the health claims used by advertisers, manufacturers or distributors. The process of obtaining each component of the sample was different depending on the web portal visited.
Inclusion criteria
Supplements defined as ‘Creatine Monohydrate’ and for sale in Europe were part of the selected sample. In addition, supplements found on the selected web portals that declared some health claims, and provided information on the dosage of the product, were included in the sample.
Exclusion criteria
Supplements that were not defined as ‘Creatine Monohydrate’ or that appeared multiple times within the search were excluded from the sample. Furthermore, supplements that did not declare any health claims, or that did not provide information on the dosage of the product, were also not part of the selected sample.
Data extraction
Following the guidelines of content analysis, a questionnaire or analysis protocol was applied to the sample, allowing its quantitative and qualitative study. The variables included in said protocol were the following:
-
Product name: the name of each of the sports foods supplements belonging to the sample was specified.
-
Sports company: the brand of each of the CM supplements belonging to the sample was defined (Appendix 1).
-
Dosage: the consumption (amount) recommended by the manufacturer, for each of the supplements.
-
Health claims regarding CM: the health claims regarding CM present on the label of each of the sports foods supplements in the sample, as well as the information present on the website where the product was marketed.
-
Degree of compliance: this refers to the extent to which the health claims regarding the CM present in the selected sample of sports foods supplements conformed to the health claims regarding this substance approved by European current legislation and current scientific evidence.
-
Health claims modification: removal/modification of health claims made on the labelling of CM supplements so that they conformed more closely to the approved claims in Europe.
Compliance with the legislation and scientific evidence
The commercial communications and the labelling of the selected sample were evaluated using the European regulation Commission Regulation (EU) No 432/2012(20) and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/672(21) regarding the authorised health claims for CM described through the effect and cause-effect relationship by EFSA(7,8) and EC(20,21) . In addition, the results were also compared with the documents from the IOC(Reference Maughan, Burke and Dvorak3), the International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN)(Reference Kerksick, Wilborn and Roberts22) and the AND(Reference Thomas, Erdman and Burke16), together with the systematic review ‘Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Athletic Performance in Soccer Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’(Reference Mielgo-Ayuso, Calleja-Gonzalez and Marqués-Jiménez23) to include the current scientific evidence.
Results
Of the 554 products identified in the initial search, 167 CM supplements, different from each other and belonging to different commercial brands, met the inclusion criteria and constituted the sample to be analysed; 222 were rejected for duplicity and another 165 for not including health claims or not conforming to the rest of the established criteria (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Flow diagram of the selection process for creatine monohydrate supplement
For the sports foods supplements included in the sample, both the name of the product and the commercial brand, as well as the health claims presented and the dosage of each supplement, were specified. The most frequent dosage indicated in the sample of CM supplements studied was ‘5–5·9 g/d’, corresponding to 30·5 % of the total, while in 29·9 % of the cases the recommended dose was ‘3–3·9 g/d’.
Current European Regulation and scientific evidence
Table 1 shows the information on effects, doses and applications of CM according to European regulation (EFSA and EC) and current scientific evidence.
Table 1 Effect and applications of the CM according to the European regulation and scientific evidence established by the reference institutions
EFSA: European Food Safety Authority; AND: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; IOC: International Olympic Committee; ISSN: International Society of Sports Nutrition.
Health claims
Table 2 establishes a percentage distribution of each health property declaration found in the sample of supplements and, in addition, compares the proposed dosages and the type of health property declaration indicated by the manufacturer for each CM sports supplement.
Table 2 Distribution of product doses according to the health claims and their reasons of adequacy
* Reason: Number 1: Cause: it does not conform to the approved health claims about the CM; Proposal to modify: delete health claim. Number 2: Cause: it conforms to approved health claims but does not meet the recommended dosage of the product; Proposal to modify: modify product dosage protocol to 3 grams. Number 3: Cause: it conforms to the approved health claims and the correct dose established but does not specify the type of exercise performed; Proposal to modify: the claim effects must be specified for ‘sport events that require explosive, high-energy output activities especially of a repeated nature’(7). Number 4: Cause: it conforms to the approved health claim, specifying the appropriate recommended dose of the product and the effects of the supplement; Proposal to modify: Not modify or remove the health claim as it fits properly.
The health claim most often described for the CM supplements was ‘Enhances physical performance’, appearing in 73·1 % of the supplements in the sample. At a distance, this was followed by ‘Increases muscle mass’ (46·7 %), ‘Improves strength’ (41·9 %), ‘Improves recovery, prevents muscle fatigue or promotes muscle regeneration’ (31·1 %), ‘Increases power’ (22·8 %), ‘Improves energy availability’ (13·8 %), ‘Increases physical resistance’ (12·0 %) and ‘Promotes cellular hydration’ (7·8 %). Less frequent health claims were ‘Supports weight loss’, ‘Enhances physical performance in adults over the age of 55’, ‘Promotes the replacement of creatine stores’, ‘Replenishes muscle glycogen stores’, ‘Improves defenses or promotes greater protection’, ‘Improves brain capacities’ and ‘Promotes cardiovascular health’. In addition, there were health claims that only appeared in a single product among the sample of sports foods supplements, such as ‘Promotes gastric emptying’, ‘Increases speed’, ‘Improves blood glucose’ and ‘Helps the growth of bones and cartilage’.
Dosage and health claims
For the statement ‘Improves strength’, a dosing protocol for loading and maintenance was indicated in most CM supplements; such a protocol was also specified for the only product that declared ‘Promotes gastric emptying’ as a CM health effect.
In the case of the health claims ‘Increases muscle mass’, ‘Promotes cellular hydration’, ‘Improves recovery, prevents muscle fatigue or promotes muscle regeneration’, ‘Increases physical resistance’, ‘Increases power’ and ‘Improves energy availability’, a dosage of 5–5·9 g/d of the CM supplement was recommended for most supplements. A similar dose was also indicated for the only supplement in the sample with the statement ‘Increases speed’.
For the products with the health claim ‘Enhances physical performance’, a dose of 3–3·9 g/d was proposed; likewise for the only supplement for which ‘Helps the growth of bones and cartilage’ was affirmed.
For the health claim ‘Promotes the replacement of creatine stores’, the manufacturers of said supplements indicated a dose below 3 g/d in two of the three CM supplements. For the only supplement for which ‘Improves blood glucose’ was declared, the indicated dosage was 5 to 10 g of product per day.
The rest of the health claims ‘Supports weight loss’, ‘Enhances physical performance in adults over the age of 55’, ‘Replenishes muscle glycogen stores’, ‘Improves defenses or promotes greater protection’, ‘Improves brain capacities’ and ‘Promotes cardiovascular health’ appeared for only two supplements in the sample, with the two dosages being different in each case.
Table 2 also indicates the adequacy of the declarations for the CM products in the sample. Only the affirmation ‘Enhances physical performance’, for some of the supplements with a recommended dose of 3–3·9 g/d, conformed to the approved guidelines which specified the appropriate recommended dose of the product and the effects produced by it; hence, a recommendation is proposed not to modify or eliminate the statement. The reasons for considering the declarations of the CM products to be adequate or non-adequate, as well as the modifications that should be made, were made in agreement with European regulation documents (Table 1).
For the health claims ‘Improves strength’, ‘Increases muscle mass’, ‘Enhances physical performance’, ‘Increases power’, ‘Enhances physical performance in adults over the age of 55’, ‘Promotes the replacement of creatine stores’ and ‘Replenishes muscle glycogen stores’, it can be verified that they conformed to the health claims of the institutions involved. In most CM supplements, the appropriate dosages were shown; however, all of them should be modified because they did not specify the type of exercise to which the claimed effects relate.
Also, the affirmations ‘Promotes cellular hydration’, ‘Improves recovery, prevents muscle fatigue or promotes muscle regeneration’, ‘Supports weight loss’, ‘Increases physical resistance’, ‘Improves energy availability’, ‘Improves defenses or promotes greater protection’, ‘Promotes gastric emptying’, ‘Increases speed’, ‘Improves brain capacities’, ‘Promotes cardiovascular health’, ‘Improves blood glucose’ and ‘Helps the growth of bones or cartilage’ did not adequately conform to the standards established by the relevant institutions.
Discussion
Only 42 of 167 supplements from the total study sample fully or partially complied with what was established by the EFSA and EC; thus, the health claim ‘Enhances physical performance’ with a dose of 3–3·9 g/d corresponded to 25 % of the study sample. The most common dosage recommended among the products in the sample (for 30·5 % of the total number) was 5–5·9 g/d, followed by the minimum dose recommended by the institutions of 3–3·9 g/d (for 29·9 % of the supplements). The health effect that was most frequently claimed – for 73·1 % of the products – was ‘Enhances physical performance’, whereas ‘Enhances physical performance in adults over the age of 55’ was only stated in two supplements from the sample. The use of CM supplements in sports is part of an attempt to improve physical performance in certain sports modalities. These supplements are marketed with distinct brand names by many companies, highlighting the effects they produce and the dosage recommended by the manufacturer. In some cases, these data do not conform to what has been established by various institutions – such as the EFSA, AND, IOC and ISSN – or by the latest reviews based on scientific evidence(Reference Maughan, Burke and Dvorak3,7,8,Reference Thomas, Erdman and Burke16,Reference Kerksick, Wilborn and Roberts22,Reference Mielgo-Ayuso, Calleja-Gonzalez and Marqués-Jiménez23) .
Health claims and proposed dosages
Currently, athletes are exposed to a significant volume of commercial communications including claims about improvements in performance and recovery produced by a wide range of products, including sports foods supplements. Legislation on nutrition and health claims, as well as claims of ergogenic effects, requires that they be supported by scientific evidence and cannot mislead consumers by creating false expectations by exaggerating the performance-enhancing ability of a certain product(Reference Cotugna, Vickery and McBee24,Reference Gabriels and Lambert25) .
Athletes sometimes obtain scarce and/or confusing information on the use of these products, to which we can add the lack of knowledge of the athletes on both aspects related to general nutrition and the specific needs of the practice of sports, which some studies highlight(Reference Heneghan, Howick and O’Neill26). This lack of knowledge can be exacerbated if there are erroneous beliefs about eating habits confounded by friends, family, coaches, advertising, etc.(Reference Kunkel, Bell and Luccia27).
Within the sample of supplements examined in this study, 19 different health effects were claimed by the manufacturers. Of these, only seven declarations fully or partially complied with that established by the relevant institutions, consensus documents or scientific evidence. These declarations are approved at a European level by the EFSA and the EC, the latter having specific legislation to regulate these products(Reference Martínez-Sanz, Sospedra and Baladía9,15,28) . As indicated, only in the case of the claims ‘Improves strength’, ‘Increases muscle mass’, ‘Enhances physical performance’, ‘Increases power’, ‘Enhances physical performance in adults over the age of 55’, ‘Promotes the replacement of creatine stores’ and ‘Replenishes muscle glycogen stores’, their adequacy was confirmed. It should be noted that the effects declared for CM appear with minimum doses of 3 g/d of the product.
Action and proposals to deal with incomplete, inaccurate or confusing health claims
From the point of view of the advertising and marketing of food products, the EFSA is involved in food safety in the context of public health at the European level(Reference Martínez-Sanz, Sospedra and Baladía9). The administrative and judicial actions that derive from the aforementioned regulatory framework are completed with the activity of organisations such as the Association of Communication Users (AUC), to which any user can report inappropriate advertising content that they consider not suitable for the public or the advertising object, and Autocontrol, an independent self-regulatory body for commercial communications. Some studies show that some sports foods supplements are not based on correct scientific references(Reference Heneghan, Howick and O’Neill26). The study by Molinero et al. points out that 52·8 % of the sports foods supplements analysed did not provide scientific references in accordance with the statements attributed to them(Reference Molinero and Marquez29). In this study, some of the health claims were not in agreement with the scientific evidence(Reference Maughan, Burke and Dvorak3,Reference Kreider, Kalman and Antonio10,Reference Thomas, Erdman and Burke16,Reference Kerksick, Wilborn and Roberts22,Reference Mielgo-Ayuso, Calleja-Gonzalez and Marqués-Jiménez23) , such as ‘Helps the growth of bones and cartilage’, ‘Supports weight loss’ or ‘Promotes cardiovascular health’.
It is therefore recommended that the European institutions and policy decision-makers work together to achieve their objectives by focusing on advertising that is suitable for all audiences and appropriate to the product or service offered(Reference Kunkel, Bell and Luccia27). To establish a policy recommendation and to move this process forward, an appropriate institutional setting is needed. Consumer protection provisions should promote greater levels of policy development, regulatory enforcement and consumer education(Reference Martínez-Sanz, Sospedra and Baladía9).
Advertising fraud cases
Fraudulent sports foods supplements-related situations often occur. The aforementioned organisations have had to act on multiple occasions, serving as a tool for citizens to complain to the advertiser. Two cases about incorrect health claims (advertising fraud) in sports foods are Amino X and Vitargo. In the Amino X case, effects of the product that were not real were cited, leading to consumer fraud. For Vitargo, the existence of nutrients in the product was declared, but certain criteria for their concentrations were not met, and it was implied that the amounts present were higher than those actually contained within the product(30).
This type of fraud has also been observed in food. The Foodwatch study, conducted in the Netherlands and Germany, highlighted the use of claims of health-enhancing properties or the presence of high concentrations of certain nutrients as a marketing tool for unhealthy foods(Reference Bode31). In addition to incorrect health claims, differences between the labelling and composition of CM can also be found(Reference Sg, Gv de and Ts32), and prohibited or undeclared substances may even be present(Reference Maughan, Burke and Dvorak3).
Study limitations
The search for the sample of products was carried out in April 2019. Thus, newer supplements may be available in the search portals used that are not included in the present results.
Another of the difficulties of the study was the variability of the results from the search portals, as well as the existence of products that did not offer the information required for the study.
This work also highlights the multitude of health claims made by manufacturers or advertisers, in some cases presenting very confusing information.
Conclusions
The health claims made for sports foods supplements must completely conform to the criteria established by European legislation and must be in agreement with scientific evidence. Sports foods supplements fraud is found in various forms within the advertising and marketing of food, strongly affecting consumers. Lastly, ensuring the quality of food advertising must be the job of advertisers, consumers and public health or sports policies and must reflect the rights of consumers defined by current regulations.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements: We are grateful to David Walker and Mario Fon (native English speakers) for their reviews of the English grammar and style of the current report. Financial support: The authors declare that they have had no source of funding. Conflicts of interest: The authors state that there is no conflict of interest. Authorship: JMM-S, LMJ and IS designed the study; AP, JMM-S and CGD reviewed and supervised the study; LMJ performed data collection; LMJ, IS and AGI interpreted the data; JMM-S, LMJ and AP wrote the manuscript; AP, AGI, IS and CGD reviewed and edited the manuscript; and all authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Ethics of human subject participation: This study is carried out on a sample of creatine monohydrate products or supplements, and ethical standards are not necessary.
Supplementary material
For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020005121
Open access
