Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:47:24.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Under the Influence? Intellectual Exchange in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

David Carter
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
Arthur Spirling
Affiliation:
University of Rochester

Extract

Intellectual exchange is central to progress in any discipline, including political science. The transfer of knowledge, ideas, and techniques takes place in many forums (e.g., advisor-student meetings, conferences, department lounges) and it is no simple task to systematically identify or quantify this interchange. In general though, the fruition of a successful or insightful idea is a published journal article or book. The way in which the author(s) of a published piece of work acknowledges previous or contemporary work that contributed to its development is via references or citations. Thus, while we cannot easily keep track of the entire process of intellectual exchange that leads to publication, citations inform us of other (usually published) work that influenced and contributed to the articles and books that make up the research output of the field.We thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments on content and structure.

Type
THE PROFESSION
Copyright
© 2008 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amadae, S. M., and Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. 1999. “The Rochester School: The Origins of Positive Political Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 26995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. A., and M. E. Terry. 1952. “Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs I: The Method of Paired Comparisons.” Biometrika 39: 32445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, James, and Lee Sigelman. 1985. “Accrediting Knowledge: Journal Stature and Citation Impact in Social Science.” Social Science Quarterly 66: 96475.Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, and Pippa Norris. 1991. “British and American Journal Evaluation: Divergence or Convergence?PS: Political Science and Politics 24: 52431.Google Scholar
Firth, David. 2005. “Bradley-Terry Models in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 12.Google Scholar
Garand, James C. 1990. “An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 23: 44851.Google Scholar
Garand, James C., and Micheal W. Giles. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science and Politics 36: 293308.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and James C. Garand. 2007. “Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (October): 74152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Francie Mizell, and David Patterson. 1989. “Political Scientists' Journal Evaluation Revisited.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22 (September): 6137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and Gerald Wright. 1975. “Political Scientists' Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 8: 2547.Google Scholar
Goodson, Larry, Bradford Dillman, and Anil Hira. 1999. “Ranking the Presses: Political Scientists Evaluations of Publisher Quality.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32: 25762.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 75366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, S. 1994. “Citation Patterns in the Journals of Statistics and Probability.” Statistical Science 9: 94108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar