Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:13:49.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Tale of Two Campaigns: Ralph Nader's Strategy in the 2004 Presidential Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2006

Barry C. Burden
Barry C. Burden
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the final days of the 2004 election, independent candidate Ralph Nader hardly resembled the same man who ran for president four years earlier. In 2000, Nader had catapulted himself from consumer activist to Green Party nominee, pledging to build a new progressive alternative to the Democratic and Republican parties. He raised $8.4 million, appeared on 44 state ballots, earned almost three million votes nationwide, and was widely blamed for Al Gore's defeat in Florida. Four years later, Nader had shed his Green Party affiliation, raised only $4.6 million, appeared on just 35 ballots, and earned a meager .38% of the popular vote. The controversial third party candidate who drew so much attention for his pivotal role in the 2000 election outcome had become a mere footnote by 2004.I thank Phil Jones for research assistance, Theresa Amato for Nader travel information, and participants in the Riker Seminar at the University of Rochester for comments.

Type
FEATURES
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , October 2006 , pp. 871 - 874
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Althaus, Scott L., Peter F. Nardulli, and Daron R. Shaw. 2002. “Candidate Appearances in Presidential Elections, 1972–2000.” Political Communication 19: 49–72.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1985. “Resource Allocation in a Presidential Campaign.” Journal of Politics 47: 928–36.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2003. “Minor Parties in the 2000 Presidential Election.” In Models of Voting in Presidential Elections: The 2000 U.S. Election, Eds. Herbert F. Weisberg and Clyde Wilcox. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Burden, Barry C. 2005. “Ralph Nader's Campaign Strategy in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election.” American Politics Research 33: 672–99.Google Scholar
Collett, Christian, and Jerrold R. Hansen. 2002. “Sharing the Spoils: Ralph Nader, the Green Party, and the Elections of 2000.” In Multiparty Politics in America, 2nd ed., Eds. Paul S. Herrnson and John C. Green. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 341–55.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Ronald, and Walter Stone. 2005. Three's a Crowd: The Dynamics of Third Parties, Ross Perot, and Republican Resurgence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rosenstone, Steven J., Roy L. Behr, and Edward H. Lazarus. 1996. Third Parties in America, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wand, Jonathan N., Kenneth W. Shotts, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, Walter R. Mebane Jr., Michael C. Herron, and Henry E. Brady. 2001. “The Butterfly Did It: The Aberrant Vote for Buchanan in Palm Beach County, Florida.” American Political Science Review 95: 793–810.Google Scholar