Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T15:16:01.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sweating the Vote: Heat and Abstention in the US House of Representatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

Alexander Cohen
Alexander Cohen
Affiliation:
Ashford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several recent studies noted systematic links between weather conditions and voting turnout amid the mass public. This article extends this logic to the elite level by exploring the relationship between summer heat and abstentions in the US House of Representatives. In controlled multivariate regressions, heat is a significant predictor of abstentions across all votes held between 1991 and 2000. This finding provides new insight into legislative behavior as well as the motivation behind some abstentions, which could inform the understanding of the literature on legislative shirking.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 74 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carson, J., Crespin, M., Jenkins, J., and Vander Wielen, R.. 2004. “Shirking in the Contemporary Congress: A Reappraisal.” Political Analysis 12: 176–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Field, S. 1992. “The Effect of Temperature on Crime.” British Journal of Criminology 32: 340–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlio, D. 1995. “The Effect of Retirement on Political Shirking: Evidence from Congressional Voting.” Public Finance Review 23: 226–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B., Hansford, T., and Krause, G.. 2007. “The Republicans Should Pray for Rain: Weather, Turnout, and Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections.” The Journal of Politics 69 (3): 649–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, E., and Hoffman, M.. 1984. “A Multidimensional Approach to the Relationship Between Mood and Weather.” British Journal of Psychology 75: 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, M., Fredrickson, B., Ybarra, O., Cote, S., Johnson, K., Mikels, J., Conway, A., and Wager, T.. 2005. “A Warm Heart and a Clear Head: The Contingent Effects of Weather on Mood and Cognition.” Psychological Science 16 (9): 724–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D., and MacFarlane, S.. 1984. “Ambient Temperature and Horn-Honking: A Field Study of the Heat/Aggression Relationship.” Environment and Behavior 18: 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, S. 1994. “Does Rain Help Republicans? Theory and Evidence on Turnout and the Vote.” Public Choice 79 (1-2): 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhdar, C., and Dubois, E.. 2006. “Climate and Electoral Turnout in France.” French Politics 4: 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, C. 2007. “Of Shirking, Outliers, and Statistical Artifacts: Lame-Duck Legislators and Support for Impeachment.” Political Research Quarterly 60: 159–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, G. 2001. “The Meteorological Sensitivity of Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality Events in Birmingham, UK.” International Journal of Biometeorology 45: 133–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nastos, P., and Matzarakis, A.. 2006. “Weather Impacts on the Respiratory Infections in Athens, Greece.” International Journal of Biometeorolgy 51: 27–36.Google Scholar
Noll, R., and Cohen, L.. 1991. “How to Vote, Whether to Vote: Strategies for Voting and Abstaining on Congressional Roll Calls.” Political Behavior 13: 97–127.Google Scholar
Poole, K. 2007. “Changing Minds? Not in Congress!” Public Choice 131: 435–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K., and Romer, T.. 1993. “Ideology, ‘Shirking,’ and Representation.” Public Choice 77: 185–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K., and Rosenthal, H.. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, K., and Rosenthal, H.. 2007. Ideology and Congress. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. 1833. Research on the Propensity for Crime at Different Ages. Brussels: Royal Academy.Google Scholar
Reifman, A., Larrick, R., and Fein, C.. 1991. “Temper and Temperature on the Diamond: The Heat-Aggression Relationship in Major League Baseball.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 580–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, K. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, L., and Sanders, M.. 2000a. “Lame Duck Politics: Impending Departure and the Votes on Impeachment.” Political Research Quarterly 53: 523–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, L., and Sanders, M.. 2000b. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 310–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, L., and Sanders, M.. 2004. “Reply to ‘Shirking in the Contemporary Congress: A Reappraisal.’” Political Analysis 12: 180–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, J., and Brizzolara, M.. 1982. “Relationships between Weather and Mood.” Journal of General Psychology 12: 180–81.Google Scholar
Steadman, R. 1984. “A Universal Scale of Apparent Temperature.” Journal of Applied Meteorology 23: 1674–87.Google Scholar
Vrij, A., Van Der Steen, J., and Koppelaar, L.. 1994. “Aggression of Police Officers as a Function of Temperature: An Experiment with the Fire Arms Training System.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 4: 365–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar