Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:58:00.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Networks in Comparative Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

David A. Siegel
David A. Siegel
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a sense, the study of comparative politics is the study of the role that context plays in structuring behavior. Institutional contexts, such as the nature of the electoral system or the existence of an independent judiciary, drive differences in electoral outcomes or human rights across nations. Individual-level contextual factors such as norms, culture, or ethnic or religious identity can be determinative in understanding when social movements will likely flourish and which cleavages will lead to political parties or ethnic strife. Variation in context leads to variation in political outcomes and behavior across both peoples and nations, and provides comparative politics with its richness.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 51 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, Ray Jr., and Siegel, David A. 2008. “Social Determinants of Identity Choice.” Paper presented at the 2008 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Boston, August 28–31.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon, and Macy, Michael. 2007. “Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (3): 702–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Wendy K. Tam, and Fowler, James H.. 2010. “Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 124–35.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. “State Repression and Political Order.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2005. “Turnout in a Small World.” In Social Logic of Politics, ed. Zuckerman, Alan, 269–87. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Franzese, Robert J. Jr., and Hays, Jude C.. 2008. “Interdependence in Comparative Politics: Substance, Theory, Empirics, Substance.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4/5): 742–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedkin, Noah E., and Johnsen, Eugene C.. 1999. “Social Influence Networks and Opinion Change.” Advances in Group Processes 16: 1–29.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Larimer, Christopher W.. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 2001. “Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for Consolidating Russia's Democratic Transition.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Sona N. 2006. The Logic of Pre-Electoral Coalition Formation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Roger V. 1993. “Collective Action and Network Structure.” American Sociological Review 58 (2): 182–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 1420–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert. 2001. “The Social Communication of Political Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert R., and Sprague, John. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Matthew O. 2008. Social and Economic Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44 (1): 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. 1990. “Social Interaction and Contextual Influences on Political Participation.” American Politics Research 18 (4): 459–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1994. “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91.” World Politics 47 (1): 42–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2006. “A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Political Analysis 14: 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwell, Gerald, and Oliver, Pamela. 1993. The Critical Mass in Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1988. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCall, Cade, and Dasgupta, Nilanjana. 2007. “The Malleability of Men's Gender Self-Concept.” Self and Identity 6: 173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClurg, Scott D. 2006. “The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 737–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1995. “Media Exposure and Political Discussion in U.S. Elections.” Journal of Politics 57: 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Gern, Christiane. 1993. “Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989.” American Sociological Review 58: 659–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, David Siddhartha. 2005. “Ayatollahs on the Pareto Frontier: The Institutional Bases of Shiite Religious Authority in Iraq.” Working paper, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Petersen, Roger Dale. 2001. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe. Studies in Rationality and Social Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Daniel N. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rolfe, Meredith. 2005. “Conditional Choice: Social Networks and Decision-Making.” Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 7–10.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, David A. 2009. “Social Networks and Collective Action.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 122–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, David A. Forthcoming. “When Does Repression Work?: Collective Action in Social Networks.” Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Betsy. 2009. “The Social Citizen: Political Communication Networks and Persuasion.” Paper presented at the 2009 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Toronto, Canada, September 3–9.Google Scholar
Smedley, Audrey. 2001. “Social Origins of the Idea of Race.” In Race in the 21st Century, ed. Stokes, Curtis, Melendez, Theresa, and Rhodes-Reed, Genice, 1–24. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1996. “Making Social Science Work across Space and Time: A Critical Reflection on Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work.” American Political Science Review 90 (2): 389–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L., and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar