Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:38:56.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rise and Fall of Nasty Politics in America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2012

Daniel M. Shea  and
Alex Sproveri
Daniel M. Shea
Affiliation:
Colby College
Alex Sproveri
Affiliation:
Allegheny College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is fair to say that a great swath of forest was sacrificed for the study of negative campaigning. As we might hope and expect, a great deal has been learned since our initial assumptions that negative ads would be the downfall of our republic. (For an excellent review of this literature, see Geer 2006). This PS symposium and a spate of recent work (for example, see Herbst 2010; Shea and Fiorina 2012; Sobieraj and Berry 2011), suggest growing interest in a somewhat different form of negativity: the tone of political discourse, or what we might call levels of civility in politics. Much of this work has centered on the impact of nasty politics on individuals (Forgette and Morris 2006; Mutz 2007; Mutz and Reeves 2005; Fridkin and Kenney 2008). Might vitriol turn off citizens and lead to increased levels of distrust and cynicism?

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 416 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Altschuler, G. C., and Blumin, S. M.. 2001. Rude Republic: Americans and Their Politics in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, W. D. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Chapin, E. H. 1854. The American Idea, and What Grows out of It: An Oration. Boston: Abel Tompkins.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. 2007. Anything for a Vote: Dirty Tricks, Cheap Shots, and October Surprises in U.S. Presidential Campaigns. Philadelphia: Quirk Books.Google Scholar
Daily Star. 2010. “Uncivil Politics Nothing New in America,” February 15.Google Scholar
Dionne, E.J. Jr. 1991. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Forgette, R., and Morris, J. S. 2006. “High-Conflict Television News and Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (3): 447–56.Google Scholar
FoxNews.com. 2009. “Health Care Town Hall Turns Violent in Tampa and St. Louis,” August 7. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/07/health-care-town-halls-turn-violent-tampa-st-louis/#Google Scholar
Fridkin, K. L., and Kenney, P.. 2008. “The Dimensions of Negative Messages.” American Politics Research 36 (5): 694–723.Google Scholar
Fridkin, K. L., and Kenney, P.. 2011. “Variability in Citizens' Reactions to Different Types of Negative Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 307–25.Google Scholar
Friedman, Thomas. 2009. “Where Did ‘We’ Go?” New York Times, September 29. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/opinion/30friedman.html.Google Scholar
Geer, J. G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhart, Ann. 2009. “Uncivil Political Discourse Is a Part of History.” Washington Post, October 12.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1955. “A Theory of Critical Elections.” The Journal of Politics 17 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. E. 2001. “The Enduring Dilemma of Political Tolerance in American Political History.” In The State of Democracy in America, ed. Crotty, W. J., 114–139. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., Team, The Google Books, and Orwant, J.. 2011. “Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitalized Books.” Science 331 (6014): 176–82.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. 2007. “Effects of ‘In-Your-Face’ Television: Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition.” American Political Science Review 101 (4): 621–35.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C., and Reeves, B.. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–5.Google Scholar
Nachmias, C., and Nachmias, D.. 1992. Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
“Newspapers.” 1827–8. The Medical Intelligencer 5, 614.Google Scholar
Noonan, Peggy. 2010. “The Heat is On: We May Get Burned.” Wall Street Journal, March 25. http://www.peggynoonan.com/article.php?article=516.Google Scholar
Rucker, Phillip. 2009. “Specter Faces Raucous Crowd at Town Hall Meeting.” Washington Post, August 11. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/11/AR2009081101880.html.Google Scholar
Scher, R. K. 1997. The Modern Presidential Campaign: Mudslinging, Bombast, and the Vitality of American Politics. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Shea, D. M., and Fiorina, M. P, eds. 2012. Can We Talk?: The Rise of Rude, Nasty, Stubborn Politics. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Sobieraj, Sarah, and Berry, Jeffrey M.. 2011. “From Incivility to Outrage: Political Discourse in Blogs, Talk Radio, and Cable News.” Political Communication 28 (1): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, J. L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar