Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:33:21.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflections on Congressional Government at 120 and Congress at 216

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2006

David E. Price
Affiliation:
U.S. Representative (NC, 4th district)

Extract

When I was looking for a quotation to garnish the introduction to my doctoral dissertation on Senate committees, I turned, like hundreds of graduate students before and since, to Woodrow Wilson's Congressional Government. “Congress in session is Congress on public exhibition,” he wrote (1885) and I quoted (1972), “whilst Congress in its committee-rooms is Congress at work.” But the book deserves better than simply to be mined for quotations. As Wilson's doctoral dissertation, it offers insights into his developing political thought. It illumines the operations of the national government during what was indeed a period of congressional and standing-committee ascendancy, although Wilson's account was neither objective nor totally reliable. And it prompts reflection on certain recurring dilemmas in the practice of American democracy.This essay is adapted from a presentation at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, November 14, 2005.

Type
SPECIAL TO PS
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Rebecca. 2005. “Hard Fought Energy Bill Clears,” CQ Weekly, August 1, 210810.Google Scholar
Connelly, Jr., William F. 2002. Introduction to Congressional Government. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Light, Paul. 1995. Still Artful Work. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas, and Norman Ornstein. Forthcoming. The Broken Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman, and Thomas Mann. 2006. “If You Give a Congressman a Cookie,” New York Times, January 19, A23.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 1972. Who Makes the Laws? Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 1978. “ The Impact of Reform: The House Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.” In Legislative Reform: The Policy Impact, ed. Leroy N. Rieselbach. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 1995. “ Congressional Government Revisited.” In Legacies of Woodrow Wilson, ed. James M. Morris. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Price, David E. 2004. The Congressional Experience, 3rd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul. 2005. “ Deliberation and Decision Making.” In The Legislative Branch, eds. Paul J. Quirk and Sara Binder. New York: Oxford University Press, 330342.Google Scholar
Quirk, Paul J., and Sara A. Binder. 2005. “ Congress and American Democracy: Assessing Institutional Performance.” In The Legislative Branch, eds. Paul J. Quirk and Sara Binder. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rudalevige, Andrew. 2005. The New Imperial Presidency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stockman, David. 1987. The Triumph of Politics. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Tollefson, Jeff. 2005. “With Environmental Provisions Cut, House Approves Energy Bill,” CQ Weekly, October 10, 2722.Google Scholar
Weisman, Jonathan. 2006. “Closed-Door Deal Makes $22 Billion Difference,” Washington Post, January 24, A1.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. [1885] 1973. Congressional Government. Glouster, MA: Peter Smith, 1973.Google Scholar
Wolfensberger, Don. 2005. “A Reality Check on the Republican House Reform Revolution at the Decade Mark,” Speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center International Center for Scholars, January 24, 14. Accessed at http://wwics.si.edu/events/docs/repub-rev-essay.pdf.Google Scholar