Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:50:49.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Importance of Getting Things Done

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

Jane Mansbridge
Jane Mansbridge
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Trend plus inaction equals drift. When a trend has external causes and no one can act to intervene, that inaction leads to drift—the unimpeded trajectory of change. Drift in the United States produces the domination of American democracy by business interests. Drift in international decisions produces global warming. Specific institutional designs for government, such as the US separation of powers, can cause the inaction that facilitates drift. More fundamentally, ingrained patterns of thinking can cause inaction. Here I argue that the long and multifaceted resistance tradition in the West contributes to inaction by focusing on stopping, rather than using, coercion.

Type
The 2011 James Madison Lecture
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Applbaum, Arthur Isak. 1992. “Democratic Legitimacy and Official Discretion.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 21 (3): 240–74.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B., Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2011. “Top Incomes in the Long Run of History.” Journal of Economic Literature 49 (1): 3–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Birchfield, Vicki, and Crepaz, Markus M.L.. 1998. “The Impact of Constitutional Structures and Collective and Competitive Veto Points on Income Inequality in Industrialized Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 34 (2): 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom-Hansen, Jens. 1999. “Avoiding the ‘Joint-decision Trap’: Lessons from Intergovernmental Relations in Scandinavia.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (1): 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1977. “On Removing Certain Impediments to Democracy in the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 92 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drutman, Lee Jared. 2010. “The Business of America is Lobbying: The Expansion of Corporate Political Activity and the Future of American Pluralismy.” PhD diss. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2011. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1996. “Institutionalizing the Public Interest: The Defense of Deadlock and Beyond.” American Political Science Review 90 (2): 331–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. [1962] 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, trans.T. Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. [1981] 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. McCarthy, T.. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 1995. Emerson and Self-Reliance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, and Vicente, Pedro C.. 2011. “Legal Corruption.” Economics & Politics 23 (2): 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, Hans. 1995. “Denmark: A Light in the Darkness of the Holocaust?” Journal of Contemporary History 30 (3): 465–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, Gregory. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuttner, Robert. 2008. “The Copenhagen Consensus; Reading Adam Smith in Denmark.” Foreign Affairs 87 (2): 78–95.Google Scholar
Lautenbach, Manegold of. [1085] 1954. Ad Gebehardum Liber. In Medieval Political Ideas, ed. Lewis, Ewart, 164–5. London: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 2010. “Democracy after Citizens United.” Boston Review 35 (5): 11–29.Google Scholar
Lively, Jack. 1975. Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1996. “Using Power/Fighting Power: The Polity.” In Democracy and Difference, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, 46–56. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics, ed. Macedo, Steven, 211–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2011. “Clarifying Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, with James, Chambers, Simone, Estlund, David, Follesdal, Andreas, Fung, Archon, Lafont, Cristina, Manin, Bernard, and Martí, José Luis. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Christiano, Tom, Fung, Archon, Parkinson, John, Thompson, Dennis, and Warren, Mark. Forthcoming. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems, ed. Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayne, Quinton. 2010. “The Satisfied Citizen: Participation, Influence, and Public Perceptions of Democratic Performance.” Ph.D. diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2011. “Becoming Denmark: Understanding Good Governance Historical Achievers.” In Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption, ed. Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina et al. Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development and Cooperation (also on www.againstcorruption.eu).Google Scholar
Nagel, Jack. 1975. A Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Naurin, Daniel. 2007. Deliberation behind Closed Doors: Transparency and Lobbying in the European Union. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Neblo, Michael. Forthcoming. Common Voices: Between the Theory & Practice of Deliberative Democracy, ms. in preparation.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Lant, and Woolcock, Michael. 2002. “Solutions When the Solution Is the Problem: Arraying the Disarray in Development.” Working Paper #10, Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Robert B. 2007. Supercapitalism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. Forthcoming. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2002. The “60-vote Senate.” In U.S. Senate Exceptionalism, ed. Oppenheimer, Bruce I., 241–61. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1989. Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory J., and Schickler, Eric. 2010. “Legislative Obstructionism.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 1994. “Fugitive Democracy.” Constellations 1 (1): 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar