Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:57:28.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Networks in Political Science: Back to the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

David Lazer
David Lazer
Affiliation:
Northeastern University and Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

What are the relational dimensions of politics? Does the way that people and organizations are connected to each other matter? Are our opinions affected by the people with whom we talk? Are legislators affected by lobbyists? Is the capacity of social movements to mobilize affected by the structure of societal networks? Powerful evidence in the literature answers each of these questions in the affirmative. However, compared to other paradigmatic foci, political science has invested tiny amounts of capacity in the study of the relevance of networks to political phenomena. Far more attention has been paid to the psychology of how people process information individually as opposed to collectively, and to the role that institutions play in structuring politics as opposed to the relational undergirdings of politics. A review of the flagship journals in political science reveals a dearth of articles on networks. Few, if any, doctoral programs include courses for which the primary focus is network-related ideas, and even the notion of a relational dependence in data is rarely mentioned in discussions of the assumptions embedded in the statistical methods that dominate political science.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 61 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamic, L. A., and Glance, N.. 2005. “The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog.” Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43.Google Scholar
Allen, T. J. 1970. “Communication Networks in R&D Laboratories.” R&D Management 1 (1): 14–21.Google Scholar
Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L., and Newcomb, T. M.. 1992. Political Attitudes over the Life Span: The Bennington Women after Fifty Years. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Barabasi, A. L. 2003. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Barabasi, A. L., and Albert, R.. 1999. “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286 (5439): 509–12.Google Scholar
Bavelas, A. 1950. “Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented Groups.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22: 725–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P. F., and McPhee, W. N.. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, Killworth, Peter, Kronenfeld, David, and Sailer, Lee. 1984. “The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data.” Annual Review of Anthropology 13 (1): 495–517.Google Scholar
Boorman, S. A., and White, H. C.. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. II. Role Structures.” American Journal of Sociology 81 (6): 1384–1446.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1995. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Butts, C. T. 2003. “Predictability of Large-Scale Spatially Embedded Networks.” In Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, ed. Breiger, Ronald, Carley, Kathleen, and Pattison, Philippa, 313–23. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, G. A., Clark, J. A., and Patterson, S. C.. 1993. “Political Respect in the Legislature.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18 (1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, K. M. 2003. “Dynamic Network Analysis. Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis.” In Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, ed. Breiger, Ronald, Carley, Kathleen, and Pattison, Philippa, 133–45. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, D. P., Esterling, K. M., and Lazer, D. M. J.. 2004. “Friends, Brokers, and Transitivity: Who Informs Whom in Washington Politics?” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 224–46.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., and Fowler, J. H.. 2007. “The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years.” New England Journal of Medicine 357 (4): 370–79.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., and Fowler, J. H.. 2009. Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Eagle, N., Pentland, A. S., and Lazer, D.. 2009. “Inferring Friendship Network Structure by Using Mobile Phone Data.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (36): 15,274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emerson, R. M. 1976. “Social Exchange Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 2 (1): 335–62.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations 7 (2): 117–40.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., and Back, K.. 1963. Social Pressures in Informal Groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2005. “Turnout in a Small World.” In The Social Logic of Politics, ed. Zuckerman, Alan, 269–87. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H. 2006. “Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks.” Political Analysis 14 (4): 456–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks—Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1 (3): 215–39.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 2003. “Finding Social Groups: A Meta-Analysis of the Southern Women Data.” In Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, ed. Breiger, Ronald, Carley, Kathleen, and Pattison, Philippa, 37–77. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K., and Freeman, S. C.. 1987. “Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy.” American Anthropologist 89 (2): 310–25.Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. E. 1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladwell, M. 2002. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Kahler, M., and Montgomery, A. H.. 2009. “Network Analysis for International Relations.” International Organization 63 (3): 559–92.Google Scholar
Heaney, M. T. 2006. “Brokering Health Policy: Coalitions, Parties, and Interest Group Influence.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 31 (5): 887–944.Google Scholar
Heinz, J. P. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W., and Leinhardt, S.. 1970. “A Method for Detecting Structure in Sociometric Data.” American Journal of Sociology 76 (3): 492–513.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., and Sprague, J.. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, M., Suri, S., and Montfort, N.. 2006. “An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks.” Science 313 (5788): 824–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laumann, E. O., and Knoke, D.. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, B., and Gaudet, H.. 1968. The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lazer, David. 1999. “The Free Trade Epidemic of the 1860s and Other Outbreaks of Economic Discrimination.” World Politics 51: 447–83.Google Scholar
Lazer, David, et al. 2009. “Life in the Network: the Coming Age of Computational Social Science.” Science 323 (5915): 721–23.Google Scholar
Lazer, David, Rubineau, Brian, Chetkovich, Carol, Katz, Nancy, and Neblo, Michael. 2010a. “The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes.” Political Communication 27 (3): 248–74.Google Scholar
Lazer, David, Sokhey, Anand E., Neblo, Michael A., and Esterling, Kevin M.. 2010b. “Deliberative Ripples: The Network Effects of Political Events.” Social Science Research Network, August 10. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1656553.Google Scholar
Lin, Nan. 2001. “Building a Network Theory of Social Capital.” In Social Capital: Theory and Research, ed. Lin, Nan, Cook, Karen, and Burt, Ronald, 3–29. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Maoz, Z. Forthcoming. Networks of Nations: The Evolution, Structure, and Effects of International Networks, 1816–2001. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Z., and Russett, B.. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 624–38.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. 1987. “Core Discussion Networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review 52 (1): 122–31.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V., and Friedkin, N. E.. 1994. “Network Studies of Social Influence.” In Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Wasserman, Stanley and Galaskiewicz, Joseph, 3–25. Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., and Cook, J. M.. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27 (1): 415–44.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. 1967. “The Small World Problem.” Psychology Today 2 (1): 60–67.Google Scholar
Mobius, M. M., Szeidl, A., and Center, L.. 2007. “Trust and Social Collateral.” National Bureau of Economic Research working paper.Google Scholar
Moody, J. 2002. “The Importance of Relationship Timing for Diffusion.” Social Forces 81 (1): 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, J. L. 1934. Who Shall Survive. Beacon, NY: Beacon House.Google Scholar
Morris, M., and Kretzschmar, M.. 1997. “Concurrent Partnerships and the Spread of HIV.” Aids 11 (5): 641–48.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. 2004. “Cross-Cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 111–26.Google Scholar
Mutz, D. C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nickerson, D. W. 2008. “Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 49–57.Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, John, Ward, Michael D., Lofdahl, Corey L., Cohen, Jordin S., Brown, David S., Reilly, David, Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Shin, Michael. 1998. “The Diffusion of Democracy, 1946–1994.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (4): 545–74.Google Scholar
Onnela, J.-P., and Lazer, D.. 2009. “The Evolving Co-contribution Network of the U.S. Electoral System.” Paper presented at the Political Networks Conference II, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, J., Szabó, G., Lazer, D., Kaski, K., Kertész, J., and Barabási, A.-L.. 2007. “Structure and Tie Strengths in Mobile Communication Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (18): 7332–36.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F., and Ansell, C. K.. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (6): 1259–1319.Google Scholar
Patterson, S. C. 1959. “Patterns of Interpersonal Relations in a State Legislative Group: The Wisconsin Assembly.” Public Opinion Quarterly 23 (1): 101–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, I. de Sola, and Kochen, M.. 1978. “Contacts and Influence.” Social Networks 1: 1–48.Google Scholar
Porter, M. A., Onnela, J. P., and Mucha, P. J.. 2009. “Communities in Networks.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 56: 1082–97; 1164–66.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 1966. “Political Attitudes and the Local Community.” American Political Science Review 60 (3): 640–54.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, with R., and Nanetti, R. Y.. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Routt, G. C. 1938. “Interpersonal Relationships and the Legislative Process.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 195: 129–36.Google Scholar
Sacerdote, B. 2001. “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2): 681–704.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1988. “Social Network Analysis.” Sociology 22 (1): 109–27.Google Scholar
Sherif, Muzafer, Harvey, O. J., Hood, William R., Sherif, Carolyn W., and White, Jack. 1961. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A., and Elkins, Z.. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 171–89.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. 2005. “Models for Longitudinal Network Data.” In Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, ed. Carrington, Peter J., Scott, John, and Wasserman, Stanley, 215–47. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strogatz, S. H. 2003. Sync: The Emerging Science of Spontaneous Order. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1999. “Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing.” American Sociological Review 64 (4): 481–505.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J. 2003. Small Worlds: the Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J. 2004. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., and Strogatz, S. H.. 1998. “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-World’ Networks.” Nature 393 (6684): 440–42.Google Scholar
White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., and Breiger, R. L.. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions.” American Journal of Sociology 81 (4): 730–80.Google Scholar