Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:51:52.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Gender Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

Karen M. Kaufmann
Karen M. Kaufmann
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gender differences in political behavior are a source of ongoing interest for political pundits, campaign advisors, and students of American politics. In a closely divided nation, even small shifts in the political choices of men and women can have significant electoral consequences. In politics, the gender gap refers to male-female differences in party identification and voting behavior. As a practical matter, the contemporary gender gap (with women more aligned with the Democratic Party) emerged in 1964 with the election of Lyndon B. Johnson. The gender divide has grown incrementally over time, hitting a contemporary high of 14 percentage points in 1996 (see Figure 1). Since then, the size of the political difference between men and women has declined somewhat; the 2004 gender gap in party identification and voting fell to 9.5 and 7 points, respectively. The 2004 vote gap was half of what it was at its apex in 1996, and while one hesitates to make too much of a single point on this larger time series, a sustained contraction of the gender gap could pose rather dire circumstances for the Democratic Party, or, conversely, great fortune for the Republicans.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 447 - 453
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Suzanna De Boef, and Tse-Min Lin. 2004. “The Dynamics of the Partisan Gender Gap.” American Political Science Review 98: 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, Carole K., R. Michael Alvarez, and Jonathan Nagler. 1998. “Explaining the Gender Gap in the U.S. Presidential Elections, 1980–1992.” Political Research Quarterly 51: 311–340.Google Scholar
Erie, Steven P., and Martin Rein. 1988. “ Women and the Welfare State.” In The Politics of the Gender Gap: The Social Construction of Political Influence, ed. Carol M. Mueller. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Frankovic, Kathleen. 1982. “Sex and Politics: New Alignments, Old Issues.” PS: Political Science and Politics 15: 439–448.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M. 2002. “Culture Wars, Secular Realignment and the Gender Gap in Party Identification.” Political Behavior 24: 283–307.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M., and John R. Petrocik. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 864–887.Google Scholar
Klein, Ethel. 1984. Gender Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren E. 1991. “Party Identification, Realignment and Party Voting: Back to Basics.” American Political Science Review 85: 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara. 1999. “The Evolution of the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 63: 566–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven, Frances F. 1985. “ Women and the State: Ideology, Power, and the Welfare State.” In Gender and the Life Course, ed. Alice S. Rossi. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s and 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 42–61.Google Scholar
Smeal, Eleanor. 1984. Why and How Women Will Elect the Next President. New York. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wirls, Daniel. 1986. “Reinterpreting the Gender Gap.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 316–330.Google Scholar