Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:41:17.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Networking Networkers: An Initial Exploration of the Patterns of Collaboration among the Members of a New Community in Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Ramiro Berardo
Ramiro Berardo
Affiliation:
CONICET (Argentina), University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of indicators signal a growing interest in the study of political phenomena from a network perspective in the United States, such as the growing number of published articles with a network focus in the discipline's top-tier journals and the creation of a new Political Networks section of the APSA in 2008. Yet another notable indicator is the organization of a new annual conference financially supported by the National Science Foundation—the Political Networks conference. The meeting not only brings together scholars who study networks in political science, but also fosters collaboration across disciplines by encouraging participation of non–political scientists with the goal of achieving more comprehensive answers to questions that cannot be properly answered within the confines of individual disciplines.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 69 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel. 1988. “Separate Tables: Schools and Sects in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21 (4): 828–42.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., and Freeman, L. C.. 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Corman, Steven R., and Scott, Craig R.. 1994. “Perceived Networks, Activity, Foci, and Observable Communication in Social Collectives.” Communication Theory 4: 171–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Linton C., Romney, A. Kimball, and Freeman, Sue C.. 1987. “Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy.” American Anthropologist 89: 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garand, James C., and Giles, Michael W.. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (2): 293–308.Google Scholar
Grant, J. Tobin. 2005. “What Divides Us? The Image and Organization of Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (3): 379–86.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, David, and Stern, Robert. 1988. “Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation.” Social Psychology Quarterly 51: 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 2009. “Are Two (or Three or Four … or Nine) Heads Better than One? Collaboration, Multidisciplinarity, and Publishability.” PS: Political Science & Politics 42 (3): 507–12.Google Scholar