Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:30:44.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

My Professor is a Partisan Hack: How Perceptions of a Professor's Political Views Affect Student Course Evaluations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

April Kelly-Woessner  and
Matthew C. Woessner
April Kelly-Woessner
Affiliation:
Elizabethtown College
Matthew C. Woessner
Affiliation:
Penn State, Harrisburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years, a number of prominent political commentators have raised concerns about the lack of ideological diversity on college campuses (Shapiro 2004; Black 2004; Kors and Silvergate 1999; Kimball 1998). Among other accusations, they claim that liberal college professors may actually penalize students for expressing conservative opinions by assigning them lower marks on exams and assignments (Horowitz 2003; Hebel 2004). Their concern is not without merit. Researchers have found that, when evaluating a colleague's research, college professors are more critical of work that contradicts their own views (Mahoney 1977). It is logical to assume that the same bias influences professors' evaluations of students' arguments. It is also reasonable to expect that students, charged with the important task of evaluating their professors, are vulnerable to their own ideological biases.We thank Markus Kemmelmeier and Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier for their helpful suggestions and valuable guidance. We also acknowledge the valuable support of research assistants Jessica Defenderfer, Cristina Ciocirlan, and Kathleen Winters. Finally, we would like to acknowledge a debt of gratitude to the dozens of political science faculty throughout the country who took the time to distribute our survey to their undergraduate students. This project would not have been possible without their generous assistance. This research was funded through a Faculty Research Grant from Elizabethtown College.

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , July 2006 , pp. 495 - 501
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, Jim Nelson. 2004. Freefall of the American University: How Our Colleges Are Corrupting the Minds and Morals of the Next Generation. Nashville, TN: Nelson Current.Google Scholar
Chaffee, Steven H., Melissa Nichols Saphir, Joseph Graf, Christian Sandvig, and Kyu Sup Hahn. 2001. “Attention to Counter-Attitudinal Messages in a State Election Campaign.” Political Communication 18: 247–272.Google Scholar
Epley, N., K. Savitsky, and T. Gilovich. 2001. “Empathy Neglect: Reconciling the Spotlight Effect and Correspondence Bias.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 300–312.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Frey, D. 1986. “ Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 19, ed. L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hebel, Sara. 2004. “Patrolling Professors' Politics.” Chronicle of Higher Education 50: A18.Google Scholar
Hollander, B. A. 1996. “Fuel to the Fire: Talk Radio and the Gamson Hypothesis.” Political Communication 14: 355–370.Google Scholar
Hollander, B. A. 1994. “Patterns in the Exposure and Influence of the Old News and the New News.” Mass Communication Review 21: 144–155.Google Scholar
Horowitz, David. 2003. “The Campus Blacklist.” FrontpageMagazine.com, April 18.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1987. “Networks in Context: The Social Flow of Political Information.” American Political Science Review 81: 1197–1216.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. 1996. “Resisting Change: Information-Seeking and Stereotype Change.” European Journal of Social Psychology 26: 799–825.Google Scholar
Jonas, Eva, Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Dieter Frey, and Norman Thelen. 2001. “Confirmation Bias in Sequential Information Search after Preliminary Decisions: An Expansion of Dissonance Theoretical Research on Selective Exposure to Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80: 557–571.Google Scholar
Kimball, Roger. 1998. Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Our Higher Education. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
Kors, Alan Charles, and Harvey A. Silvergate. 1999. The Shadow University: The Betrayal of Liberty on America's Campuses. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108: 480–498.Google Scholar
Lapinski, Maria Knight, and Franklin J. Boster. 2001. “Modeling the Ego-Defensive Function of Attitudes.” Communication Monographs 68: 314–324.Google Scholar
Lord, C. G., L. Ross, and M. R. Leeper. 1979. “Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 2098–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, Charles Taber, and Aron Chase Galonsky. 1999. “The Political Consequences of Motivated Reasoning: Partisan Bias in Information Processing.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Lundgren, S. R., and R. Prislin. 1998. “Motivated Cognitive Processing and Attitude Change.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 715–26.Google Scholar
Mahoney, M. J. 1977. “Publication Prejudices: An Experimental Study of Confirmatory Bias in the Peer Review System.” Cognitive Therapy and Research 1: 161–175.Google Scholar
McCombs, M., E. Einsiedel, and D. Weaver. 1991. Contemporary Public Opinion: Issues and the News. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
McGuire, William. 1969. “ The Nature of Attitudes and Attitude Change.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 3, ed. G. Lindzey and E. Aronson. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Rothman, Stanley, Robert Lichter, and Neil Nevitte. 2005. “Politics and Professional Advancement among College Faculty.” The Forum 3:1. Available at www.bepress.com/forum/vol3/iss1/art2, accessed on October 2, 2005.Google Scholar
Sears, David, and J. Freedman. 1967. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review.” Public Opinion Quarterly 23: 194–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severin, W. J., and J. W. Tankard. 1992. Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media, 3rd edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ben. 2004. Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth. Nashville, TN: Nelson Current.Google Scholar
Valle, Antonio, Ramon Cabanach, Jose Nunez, and Julio Gonzalez-Pienda. 2003. “Multiple Goals, Motivation, and Academic Learning.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 73: 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John. 1991. “Information, Values, and Opinion.” American Political Science Review 85: 1215–1237.Google Scholar
Zuwerink, Julia R., and Patricia Devine. 1996. “Attitude Importance and Resistance to Persuasion: It's Not Just the Thought That Counts.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 931–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar