Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-44mx8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-19T06:13:11.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increased Realism at Lower Cost: The Case for the HybridExperiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2011

Delia Dumitrescu  and
André Blais
Delia Dumitrescu
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
André Blais
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We propose an experimental design particularly adapted to the studyof individual behavior in collective action situations. Theexperimental protocol improves on the artificiality that is commonlypresent in lab and survey experiments to achieve a closerreplication of the real-life conditions of such decisions whileavoiding the high costs associated with field experiments. Weexemplify this design by means of a study on strategic voting inelections.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 521 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blais, André. 2002. “Why Is There So Little Strategic Voting in Canadian Plurality Rule Elections?” Political Studies 50: 445–54.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, and Lomasky, Loren E., eds. 1993. Politics and Process: New Essays in Democratic Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Druckman, James D., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. 2006. “The Growth and Development of Experimental Research in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100: 627–35.Google Scholar
Loewen, Peter J. 2008. “Experimentation and Political Science: Six Applications.” Ph.D. diss., Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Thomas R. 2009. “Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 379–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar