Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:10:02.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experiential Learning in an Arms Control Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Alexander Kelle
Alexander Kelle
Affiliation:
University of Bath Claverton Down
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper discusses an arms control simulation that formed a central part of the course, Controlling Chemical and Biological Weapons. Based on the experiential learning approach this simulation sought to (a) provide an active learning context for students to acquire an in-depth understanding of central aspects of biological arms control, and (b) gain an appreciation for the complexities of multilateral diplomacy in general and arms control negotiations in particular. I taught this course in spring 2006 to a group of 16 final-year undergraduate students. The arms control simulation complemented the weekly one-hour lectures and replaced the standard one-hour student-led seminar sessions. At the beginning of the simulation I supplied students with a set of confidential country instructions to approach the simulation, which was subdivided into two negotiating rounds of three sessions each and a drafting exercise towards the end of the semester.

Type
THE TEACHER
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 379 - 385
Copyright
© 2008 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albin, C. 2001. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asal, V. 2005. “Playing Games with International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 6 (August): 359–73.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 2nd edition. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.Google Scholar
Brock, K., and B. Cameron. 1999. “Enlivening Political Science Courses with Kolb's Learning Preference Model.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (2): 251–6.Google Scholar
Faure, G. O. 1999. “Cultural Aspects of International Negotiation.” In International Negotiation. Actors, Structure/Process, Values, ed. P. Berton, H. Kimura, and I. William Zartman. Basingstoke, UK: MacMillan, 11–31.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A. 1997. “Focus Groups.” Social Research Update. Item 19. Guildford: University of Surrey. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html (February 13, 2008).Google Scholar
Hampson, F. O., and M. Hart. 1995. Multilateral Negotiations. Lessons from Arms Control, Trade, and the Environment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 23–51.Google Scholar
Kelle, A. 2004. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Security Regimes—The Chemical Weapons Control Regime's First 6 Years of Operation.” International Politics 41 (2): 221–42.Google Scholar
Kille, K. J. 2002. “Simulating the Creation of a New International Human Rights Treaty: Active Learning in the International Studies Classroom.” International Studies Perspective 3 (3): 271–90.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lederman, L. C. 1992. “Debriefing: Toward a Systematic Assessment of Theory and Practice.” Simulation & Gaming 23 (2): 145–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litosseliti, L. 2003. Using Focus Groups in Research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Littlewood, J. 2005. The Biological Weapons Convention. A Failed Revolution. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mulligan, J., and G. Griffin. 1992. Empowerment through Experiential Learning. Exploration of Good Practice. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Smith, E., and M. Boyer. 1996. “Designing In-Class Simulations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (4): 690–4.Google Scholar
Starkey, B. A., and E. L. Blake. 2001. “Simulation in International Relations Education.” Simulation & Gaming 32 (4): 537–51.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. B. 2004. “The BWC New Process: A Preliminary Assessment.” The Nonproliferation Review 11 (1): 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar