Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:52:04.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Europe's Blues: Theoretical Soul-Searching after the Rejection of the European Constitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2006

Liesbet Hooghe  and
Gary Marks
Liesbet Hooghe
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and VU Amsterdam
Gary Marks
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill and VU Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Spanish, French, Dutch, and Luxembourg referenda on the Constitutional Treaty are the latest, but certainly not the last, flashpoints in a contentious European Union. The era in which EU politics was determined by national and European elites ended about 15 years ago. With the Maastricht Accord of 1991, decision making on European integration entered the contentious world of party competition, elections, and referenda.

Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 247 - 250
Copyright
© 2006 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Erik Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and John Sides. 2004. “Can There be Europe without Europeans? Problems of Identity in a Multinational Community.” In Transnational Identities: Becoming European in the EU, edited by Richard Herrmann, Marilynn Brewer, and Thomas Risse. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 161–85.Google Scholar
Diez Medrano, Juan. 2003. Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey. 2005. “Principled Opposition and Self-Serving Support? Examining Heterogeneity in Orientations towards European Integration.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Franklin, Mark, and Cees van der Eijk. 2004. “Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe.” In European Integration and Political Conflict, edited by Gary Marks and Marco Steenbergen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 32–50.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard, Marilynn Brewer, and Thomas Risse, eds. 2004. Identities in Europe and the Institutions of the European Union. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hiscox, Michael, and Jens Hainmueller. 2005. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon. 1999. “Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses.” European Journal of Political Research 35: 69–106.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2004. “Does Identity or Economic Rationality Drive Public Opinion on European Integration?” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (3): 415–20.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–43.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole Wilson. 2002. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (8): 965–89.Google Scholar
Imig, Doug, and Sidney Tarrow, eds. 2001. Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in the New Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2005. “How National Political Parties Mobilize the Political Potentials Linked to European Integration.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary, and Marco Steenbergen, eds. 2004. European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massey, Douglas. 2002. “Presidential Address: A Brief History of Human Society: The Origin and Role of Emotion in Social Life.” American Sociological Review 67: 1–29.Google Scholar
McLaren, Lauren. 2002. “Public Support for the European Union: Cost/Benefit Analysis or Perceived Cultural Threat?” Journal of Politics 64: 551–66.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ray, Leonard. 1999. “Measuring Party Orientation towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey.” European Journal of Political Research 36: 283–306.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe. 1996. “Imagining the Future of the Euro-polity with the Help of New Concepts.” In Governance in the European Union, edited by Gary Marks, Fritz Scharpf, Philippe Schmitter, and Wolfgang Streeck. London: Sage, 1–14.Google Scholar
Spence, Jacqueline. 1997. The European Union: A View from the Top. Waver, Belgium: EOS Gallup Europe.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco, and Gary Marks. 2006 (Forthcoming). “Evaluating Expert Surveys.” European Journal of Political Research.Google Scholar
Tillman, Erik R. 2004. “The European Union at the Ballot Box? European Integration and Voting Behavior in the New Member States.” Comparative Political Studies 37, 590–610.Google Scholar