Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:57:22.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Data, Methods, and Theoretical Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2012

Rebecca J. Hannagan ,
Monica C. Schneider  and
Jill S. Greenlee
Rebecca J. Hannagan
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Monica C. Schneider
Affiliation:
Miami University, Ohio
Jill S. Greenlee
Affiliation:
Brandeis University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Within the subfields of political psychology and the study of gender, the introduction of new data collection efforts, methodologies, and theoretical approaches are transforming our understandings of these two fields and the places at which they intersect. In this article we present an overview of the research that was presented at a National Science Foundation (NSF) (#SES-1014854) funded conference “New Research on Gender in Political Psychology” at Rutgers University in March 2011. This scholarship represents the expanding questions and approaches that enhance our understanding of gender within political psychology. As a result, we suggest that further innovation is needed with regard to theory and methods to understand better how gender shapes the political attitudes and actions of individuals. Our discussion here covers the use of data, interdisciplinary methods, and intersectionality to study gender. We conclude with thoughts about the theoretical implications of this recent scholarship and the future of political science research on gender.

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 232 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, John, Funk, Carolyn, and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?” American Political Science Review 99: 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Edith J. 1995. “The Policy Priorities of African American Women in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 223–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Edith J. 1997. “Gender and Race in the State House: The Legislative Experience” The Social Science Journal 34 (2): 131–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bejarano, Christina. 2011. “Unpacking the Gender Gap: Analysis of U.S. Latino Immigrant Generations.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2010. “Using Mechanical Turk as a Subject Recruitment Tool for Experimental Research.” Unpublished manuscript, http://huber.research.yale.edu/materials/26_paper.pdf.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. forthcoming. He Runs, She Runs: Gender Stereotypes, Double Standards, and Political Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2011a. “He Runs, She Runs: Gender Stereotypes, Double Standards, and Political Campaigns.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2011b. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians. The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 597–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnson. 1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science 18: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Hicks, Barbara. 1998. “The Psychology of Overlapping Identities: Ethnic, Citizen, Nation and Beyond.” In National Identities and Ethnic Minorities in Eastern Europe, ed. Taras, Ray. 11–48. New York: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Sapiro, Virginia. 1992. “Gender Consciousness and Gender Politics in the 1991 Pilot Study: A Report to the ANES Board of Overseers.” ANES Pilot Study Report, No. nes008197.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittmar, Kelly. 2010. “Negotiating Gender: Campaign Practitioners' Reflections on Gender, Strategy, and Campaigns.” Unpublished manuscript, American Political Science Association Annual Meeting and Conference. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Kam, Cindy D.. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base.’” In Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald, Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur, 41–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Lauren. 2011. “The Psychology of Collective Action.” In Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, ed. Deaux, K. and Snyder, M., 781–95. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, Lauren, and Stewart, Abigail J.. 2007. “Personal Political Salience: The Role of Personality in Collective Identity and Action.” Political Psychology 28: 143–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., Diekman, Amanda, Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary, and Koenig, Anne. 2004. “Gender Gaps in Sociopolitical Attitudes: A Social Psychological Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (6): 796–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2008. “Parenthood and the Gender Gap.” In The Gender Gap: Voting and the Sexes, ed. Whitaker, Lois Duke, 119–40. Champagne: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2007. “The Myth of ‘Security Moms’ and ‘NASCAR Dads’: Parenthood, Political Stereotypes, and the 2004 Election.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura A., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. “Genetic Variation in Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 102: 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulton, Sarah A. 2011. “What Underlies the Gendered Quality Gap: The Role of Perceptions in Shaping the Supply of Female Candidates.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine, and Tate, Katherine. 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology 19 (1): 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., and Green, Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” The American Political Science Review 94 (3): 653–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Larimer, Christopher W.. 2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 102: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan S., and Nickerson, David W.. 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” The Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1083–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenlee, Jill S. 2010. “Soccer Moms, Hockey Moms, and the Question of ‘Transformative’ Motherhood.” Politics and Gender 6 (3): 405–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust and the Public Identity of the “Welfare Queen.” New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca J. 2008. “Gendered Political Behavior: A Darwinian Feminist Approach.” Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 59: 465–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca J., and Larimer, Christopher W.. 2011. “Assessing Gender Dynamics in Local Government: Evidence from a Statewide Field Experiment.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca J., and Larimer, Christopher W.. 2010. “Does Gender Composition Affect Group Decision Outcomes? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca J., and Oxley, Douglas. 2010a. “Understanding Gendered Political Attitudes: Clues from the Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Activation Systems.” Unpublished manuscript, Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, IL. April.Google Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca J., and Oxley, Douglas. 2010b. “Gender Differences in Fairness-related Policy Decisions.” Unpublished manuscript, American Political Science Association Annual Meeting and Conference, Washington, DC. September.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan B., Kanthak, Kris, and Victor, Jennifer N.. 2011. “Candidate Traits, Gender Roles, and the 2008 Vote.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Hatemi, Peter K., McDermott, Rose, Bailey, J. Michael, and Martin, Nicholas G.. 2011. “The Difference Effects of Gender and Sex on Vote Choice.” Political Research Quarterly DOI 1065912910391475, first published online January 24, 2011.Google Scholar
Howell, Susan E., and Day, Christine L.. 2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” The Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Capelos, Theresa. 2002. “Gender Stereotyping and Candidate Evaluation.” In The Social Psychology of Politics, ed. Ottati, Victor C., Posavac, Emil J., Edwards, John, Bryant, Fred B., Tindale, R. Scott, O'Connell, Daniel C., Heath, Linda, and Suarez-Balcazar, Yolanda. 29–53. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nadya. 1993a. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotyping for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46: 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nadya. 1993b. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lay, J. Celeste. 2011. “The Seat of Tradition?: Gender Gaps in Political Knowledge in Rural America.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine. 2007. “Seeing Gender over the Short and Long Haul.” Politics and Gender 3 (3): 378–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnaughy, Corrine M., and White, Ismail K.. 2011. “Racial Politics Complicated: The Work of Gendered Race Cues in American Politics.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose, and Hatemi, Peter K.. 2011. “Distinguishing Sex and Gender.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (1): 89–92.Google Scholar
Oxley, Zoe. 2011. “Media Coverage of Female Candidates: Belief Stereotypes and Novelty.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira, and Dolan, Kathleen. 2007. “Gender Stereotypes and Gender Preferences on the 2006 ANES Pilot Study.” ANES Pilot Study Report, No. nes 011883.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were A Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 3: 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Monica, and Bos, Angie. 2011. “The Intersection of Party and Gender Stereotypes in Evaluating Political Candidates.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Sears, Donald O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Christopher, Johnson, Martin, and Cassese, Erin. 2011. “Opportunity Structure and Sex Differences in the Contribution of Genes and Environments to Political Trust among Young Adults.” Unpublished manuscript, New Research on Gender in Political Psychology Conference. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar