Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:25:23.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXVII.—The Larval Maxillary Glands of Euphausia superba Dana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2012

M. V. Schorstein
M. V. Schorstein
Affiliation:
Grisedale Scholar, Department of Zoology, Victoria University, Manchester.
Get access

Extract

The adult antennal glands of Euphausiids have been described by Chun (1896), Zimmer (1913), Raab (1915), and Cannon and Manton (1927). In the course of an investigation into the development of these organs, undertaken by me at the suggestion of Professor H. Graham Cannon, it was discovered that they arise quite late in the life-history, whilst earlier larvæ were found to possess typical maxillary glands. This finding was not unexpected, for an inverse relationship between antennal and maxillary segmental excretory organs has been noted in the development of many Crustacea.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Section B: Biological Sciences , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , 1943 , pp. 375 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

1. Bergold, A., 1910. “Beiträge zur kenntnis des innern Baues der Süsswasserostracoden,” Zool. Jahrb., Jena, vol. xxx, p. 1.Google Scholar
2. Burian, R., and Muth, A., 1921, in Winterstein, H., 1910–1925. Handb. Vergl. Physiol., Jena, vol. ii, Hälfte 2, G. Crustaceen, pp. 633.Google Scholar
3. Cannon, H. G., 1924. “On the Development of an Estherid Crustacean,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, B, vol. ccxii, p. 395.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1925. “On the Segmental Excretory Organs of Certain Freshwater Ostracods,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, B, vol. ccxiv, p. 1.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1926. “On the Post-Embryonic Development of the Fairy Shrimp (Chirocephalus diaphanus),” Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), vol. xxxvi, p. 401.Google Scholar
Cannon, H. G., 1940. “On the Anatomy of Gigantocypris mülleri,” Discovery Reports, London, vol. xix, p. 185.Google Scholar
4. Cannon, H. G., and Manton, S. M., 1927. “Notes on the Segmental Excretory Organs of Crustacea,” I–IV, Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), vol. xxxvi, p. 439.Google Scholar
5. Chun, C., 1896. “Ueber pelagische Tiefseeschizopoda,” Atlantis, Biologische Studien über pelagische Organismen. Zoologica, Stuttgart, vol. vii, Hälfte 19, part v, pp. 137.Google Scholar
6. Claus, C., 1863. “Über einige Schizopoden und niedere Malacostraken Messinas,” Zeits. Wiss. Zool., vol. xiii, p. 422.Google Scholar
7. Ehrenburg, R., 1924, in Winterstein, H., 1910–1925. Handb. Vergl. Physiol., Jena, vol. ii, Hälfte 2, H. Tracheaten, p. 695.Google Scholar
8. Fraser, F. C., 1936. “On the Development and Distribution of the Young Stages of Krill (Euphausia superba),” Discovery Reports, London, vol. xiv, p. 1.Google Scholar
9. Grobben, C., 1880. “Die Antennendrüse der Crustaceen,” Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, vol. iii, p. 93.Google Scholar
10. Hickman, V. V., 1936. “The Embryology of the Syncarid Crustacean, Anaspides tasmaniœ,” Proc. Roy. Soc., Tasmania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Manton, S. M., 1928. “On the Embryology of a Mysid Crustacean, Hemimysis lamornœ” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, vol. ccxvi, p. 363.Google Scholar
12. Marchal, P., 1892. “Recherches Anatomiques et Physiologiques sur L'Appareil Excréteur des Crustacés Décapodes,” Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén., ser. 2, vol. x, p. 57.Google Scholar
13. Needham, A. E., 1942. “The Structure and Development of the Segmental Excretory Organs of Asellus aquaticus (Linné),” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxxxiii, part ii, p. 205.Google Scholar
14. Newell, G. E., and Baxter, E. W., 1936. “On the Nature of the Free Cell-Border of Certain Mid-Gut Epithelia,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lxxix, p. 123.Google Scholar
15. Norman, J. R., 1922. “Methods and Technique of Reconstruction,” Journ. Roy. Micr. Soc., p. 37.Google Scholar
16. Raab, F., 1914. “Beiträge zur Anatomie und Histologie der Euphausiaceen,” Arb. Zool. Inst. Univ. Wien, vol. xx, p. 125.Google Scholar
17. Sars, G. O., 1897. “On the Propagation and Early Development of Euphausiidæ,” Arch. Math. Naturv., Kristiania, vol. xx.Google Scholar
18. Schorstein, M. V., 1941. ”On the Sphincter Valve of the Antennal Gland of Marinogammarus marinus (Leach) sens, str.,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. lxi, part ii (no. 11), p. 130.Google Scholar
19. Taube, E., 1909. “Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Euphausiden. I. Die Furchung des Eies zur Gastrulation,” Zeits. Wiss. Zool., vol. xcii, p. 431.Google Scholar
Taube, E., 1915. “Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Euphausiden, II. Von der Gastrula bis zum Furciliastadium,” Zeits. Wiss. Zool., vol. cxiv, p. 577.Google Scholar
20. Vejdovský, F., 1901. “Zur Morphologie der Antennen und Schalendrüsen der Crustaceen,” Zeits. Wiss. Zool., vol. lxix, p. 378.Google Scholar
21. Vogt, W., 1935. “Die Entwicklung der Antennendrüse der Mysideen,” Zeits. Morph. Ökol. Tiere Berlin, vol. xxix, p. 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Waite, F. C., 1899. “The Structure and Development of the Antennal Glands in Homarus americanus Milne-Edwards,” Bull. Harv. Mus. Zool., vol. xxxv, p. 151.Google Scholar
23. Warren, H. S., 1938. “The Segmental Excretory Glands of Artemia salina Linn., var.principalis-Simon (The Brine Shrimp),” Journ. Morph., vol. lxii, p. 268.Google Scholar
24. Woodland, W. N. F., 1913. “On the Maxillary Glands and some other Features in the Internal Anatomy of Squilla,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., vol. lix, p. 401.Google Scholar
25. Zimmer, C., 1912. “Untersuchungen über den inneren Bau von Euphausia superba Dana,” Zoologica, Stuttgart, Heft 67, p. 65.Google Scholar