Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:56:27.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVIII.—Energy Levels of B10: Evidence from the B10 γ-ray Spectrum.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

R. B. Galloway  and
R. M. Sillitto
R. B. Galloway
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Philosophy, University of Edinburgh
R. M. Sillitto
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Philosophy, University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

A study of the γ-rays produced during the bombardment of a thick Be9 target by 600 keV deuterons was made to investigate the possible existence of a level at 2·86 MeV in B10, about which contradictory reports have appeared in the literature.

A spectrum of the γ-rays in coincidence with the 0·72 MeV B10 γ-ray (text-fig. 5) was obtained, and is interpreted as providing evidence for a level in B10 at 2·86 MeV. The relative intensities of the γ-rays in an ungated spectrum, and in spectra gated by the 0·72 and 1·02 MeV B10 γ-rays, were found, and a decay scheme consistent with the observations is deduced (text-fig. 6b). The relative intensities of the transitions in this decay scheme are consistent with the intensities of the neutron groups in a spectrum of the neutrons from this reaction. A spin value of 2 or 3 is suggested for the 2.86 MeV level.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 65 , Issue 3 , 1960 , pp. 247 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES TO LITERATURE

Ajzenberg, F., 1952. Phys. Rev., 88, 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzenberg, F., and Lauritsen, T., 1952. Rev. Mod. Phys., 24, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzenberg-Selove, F., and Lauritsen, T., 1959. Nuclear Phys., 11, 1.Google Scholar
Bockelman, C. K., Browne, C. P., Sperduto, A., and Buechner, W. W., 1953. Phys. Rev., 92, 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, A. J., and Bird, J. R., 1953. Aust.J. Phys., 6, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Génin, J., 1958. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 246, 1028.Google Scholar
Green, L. L., Scanlon, J. P., and Willmott, J. C., 1955. Proc. Phys. Soc., 68A, 386.Google Scholar
Haxel, O., and Stuhlinger, E., 1939. Z. Phys., 114, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, D., 1956. Phys. Rev., 101, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, D., 1957. Phys. Rev., 106, 975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, N. H., Davis, R. C., and Bell, P. R., 1956 (April). Nucleonics, 14, 52.Google Scholar
Pruitt, J. S., Swartz, C. D., and Hanna, S. S., 1953. Phys. Rev., 92, 1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, V. K., Hornyak, W. F., and Lauritsen, T., 1949. Phys. Rev., 76, 581.Google Scholar
Reid, G. C., 1954. Proc. Phys. Soc., 67A, 466.Google Scholar
Robbins, A. B., 1956. Phys. Rev., 101, 1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafroth, S. M., and Hanna, S. S., 1956. Phys. Rev., 104, 399.Google Scholar
Shafroth, S. M., and Hanna, S. S., 1954. Phys. Rev., 95, 86.Google Scholar
Shpetnyi, A. I., 1957. J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 32, 423. (Translation, Soviet Phys. JETP, 5, 357.)Google Scholar
Singh, J. J., 1959. Phys. Rev., 114, 871.Google Scholar
Weisskopf, V. F., 1951. Phys. Rev., 83, 1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar