Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:43:34.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Part de l'Alcool dans la Dépense Calorique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Par E. Le Breton
Par E. Le Breton
Affiliation:
Section de Physiologie de la Sorbonne, et J. TréMolièRes, Institut National d'Hygiène, 3 Rue Léon-Bonnat, Paris 16
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Alcohol and its Nutritional Significance
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , September 1955 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1955

References

Bibliographie

Atwater, W. & Benedict, F. (1902). Mem. nat. Acad. Sci. 8, 235.Google Scholar
Bartlett, G. & Barnet, H. (1949). Quart. J. Stud. Alc. 10, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, A. & Kanai, I. (1932). Biochem. Z. 255, 289.Google Scholar
Carpenter, T. M. (1933). J. Nutr. 6, 205.Google Scholar
Dontcheff, L. (1950). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris, 231, 177.Google Scholar
Dontcheff, L. (1953). Mise en évidence au moyen de l'éthanol de deux grandes catégories d'oxydations respiratoires. Thèse Sciences, Université de Strassburg.Google Scholar
Dontcheff, L. (1955). Arch. Sci. physiol. 9Google Scholar
Geppert, J. (1887). Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 22, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, N. (1951). Verkan pa den manskliga organismen av maltdrycker med olika alkoholhalt. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Keys, A., Brožek, J., Henschel, A. F., Mickelsen, O. & Taylor, H. L. (1950). The Biology of Human Starvation. Minnesota: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Breton, E. (1936 a). Ann. Physiol. Physicochim. biol. 12, 169.Google Scholar
Le Breton, E. (1936 b). Ann. Physiol. Physicochim. biol. 12, 301.Google Scholar
Le Breton, E. (1936 c). Ann. Physiol. Physicochim. biol. 12, 369.Google Scholar
Le Breton, E. (1936 d). Ann. Physiol. Physicochim. biol. 12, 805.Google Scholar
Le Breton, E. & Schaeffer, G. (1933). C.R. Acud. Sci., Paris, 197, 1066.Google Scholar
Mellanby, E. (1919). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 31.Google Scholar
Mendel, L. & Hilditch, W. (1910). Amer. J. Physiol. 27, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R. (1899). Arch. Hyg., Berl., 36, 1.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. (1901). Münch. med. Wschr. 48, 1126.Google Scholar
Pelaez, E., Segovia, N. & Mardones, J. (1949). Bol. Soc. Biol. Santiago, 6, 58.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, J. (1907). Z. diätet. phys. Ther. 10, 274.Google Scholar
Rosemann, R. (1925). Handb. Biochem., Jena, 8, 482.Google Scholar
Tögel, O., Brezina, E. & Dürig, A. (1913). Biochem. Z. 50, 298.Google Scholar
Trémolières, J., Mossé, A. & Lyon, L. (1954). Pr. méd. 62, 1862.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & McCance, R. A. (1951). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 275, p. 165.Google Scholar