Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:06:58.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Diet on Pregnancy and Lactation in the Mother, the Growth and Viability of the Foetus, and Post-Natal Development. Part 1. Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

R. C. Garry
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 1 , Issue 3-4 , September 1944 , pp. 226 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1944

References

Allen, W. M. (1931). Anat. Rec. 48, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselmino, K. J. and Hoffman, F. (1929). Arch. Gynaek. 139, 202.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, J. W. (1902). Manual of Antenatal Pathology. The Foetus, 188; 196. Edinburgh: Wm. Green.Google Scholar
Bickenbach, W. and Rupp, H. (1931). Klin. Wschr. 10, 63.Google Scholar
Boyd, E. M. (1935). Biochenz. J. 29, 985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, E. M. and Wilson, K. M. (1935). J. clin. Invest. 14, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipman, W. (1903). Rep. Lab. R. Coll. Phys. Edinb. 8, Paper 3.Google Scholar
Corey, E. L. (1932). Physiol. Zoöl. 5, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corey, E. L. (1935). Amer. J. Physiol. 113, 450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courrier, R. and Kehl, R. (1930). C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 104, 1180.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. (1919). Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 35.Google Scholar
Frazer, D., Huggett, A. St. G., Pritchard, J. J. and Tanner, D. (1942). Unpublished observations.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. and Milgram, E. J. (1935). Ukr. Biochem. J. 8, 139. (Quoted from Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 1935, 5, 1045.)Google Scholar
Grosser, O. (1925). Biologie und Pathologie des Weibes, 6, 1. Berlin: Urban and Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and the Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1935). Trud. Dinam. Razvit. 10, 93.Google Scholar
Harris, H. A. (1929). J. Anal., Lond., 64, 1.Google Scholar
Huggett, A. St. G. (1927). J. Physiol. 62, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, A. St. G. (1929). J. Physiol. 67, 360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, A. St. G. (1941). Physiol. Rev. 21, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, A. St. G. (1942). Unpublished observations.Google Scholar
Lemberg, R. and Barcroft, J. (1932). Proc. roy. Soc. (B), 110, 362.Google Scholar
Levine, P., Burnham, L., Katzin, E. M. and Vogel, P. (1941). Amer. J. Obstet Gynec. 42, 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lochhead, J. and Cramer, W. (1908). Proc. roy. Soc. (B), 80, 263.Google Scholar
Loeb, L. (1908). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 5, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, H. M. M. (1931). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 157.Google Scholar
Mason, J. H., Dalling, T. and Gordon, W. S. (1930). J. Path. Bact. 33, 783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossman, H. W. (1926). Amer. J. Anat. 37, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, J. (1931). Chemical Embryology. 1514–1516; 1531. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshima, T. (1907). Zbl. Physiol. 21, 297.Google Scholar
Ratner, B., Jackson, H. C. and Gruehl, H. L. (1927). J. Immunol. 14, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodolfo, A. (1934). J. exp. Zool. 68, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, B. (1921). Z. Kinderheilk. 27, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemons, J. M. (1919). Nutrition of the Fetus. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Slemons, J. M. and Stander, H. J. (1923). Johns Hopk. Hosp. Bull. 34, 7.Google Scholar
Toverud, K. U. (1933). Amer. J. Dis. Child. 46, 954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, A. and Hammond, J. (1938). Proc. roy. Soc. (B), 125, 311.Google Scholar
Amell, R. E. and Guerriero, W. F. (1942). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 43, 467.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, A. J. (1941). J. Obstet. Gynaec. 48, 206.Google Scholar
Bethel, F. H. (1936). J. Amer. med. Ass. 107, 564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, M. and Antis, M. (1942). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 44, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. S. P. and Fullerton, H. W. (1938). Edinb. med. J. 45, 1.Google Scholar
Dieckmann, W. J. and Kramer, S. (1941). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 41, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieckmann, W. J. and Wegner, C. R. (1934). Arch. intern. Med. 53, 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbs, J. H., Scott, W. A, Tisdall, F. F., Moyle, W. J. and Bell, M. (1942). Canad. med. Ass. J. 46, 1.Google Scholar
Ebbs, J. H., Tisdall, F. F. and Scott, W. A. (1941). J. Nutrit. 22, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grande, F. and Peraita, M. (1941). Avitaminosis y Sistenza Nervioso. Madrid: Editorial Miguel Servet.Google Scholar
Green, H. N. and Mellanby, E. (1928). Brit. med. J. ii, 691.Google Scholar
Hellman, L. M., Shettles, L. B. and Eastman, N. J. (1940). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 40, 844.Google Scholar
King, G. (1941). Caduceus, 20, 45.Google Scholar
Landor, J. V. and Pallister, R. A. (1935). Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 29, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A., Widdowson, E. M. and Verdon-Roe, C. M. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 596.Google Scholar
McGoogan, L. S. (1942). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 43, 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnick, D. and Cowgill, G. R. (1937). J. exp. Med. 66, 509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendenhall, A. M. and Drake, J. C. (1934). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 27, 800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. F. (1939). J. trop. Med. (Hyg.), 42, 109.Google Scholar
Nixon, W. C. W., Wright, M. D. and Fieller, E. C. (1942). Brit. med. J. i, 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfold, W. J. (1941). Med. J. Aust. 11, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
People's League of Health (1942). Lancet, 243, 10.Google Scholar
Richter, O., Meyer, A. E. and Bennett, J. P. (1934). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 28, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shute, E. (1942). J. Obstet. Gynaec. 49, 534.Google Scholar
Siddall, A. C. (1940). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 39, 878.Google Scholar
Stander, H. J. and Radelet, A. H. (1926). Johns Hopk. Hosp. Bull. 38, 423.Google Scholar
Strauss, M. B. (1934). J. Amer. med. Ass. 102, 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, M. B. (1935). Amer. J. med. Sci. 190, 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, R. L. and Prados, M. (1942). Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 47, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, G. W. (1930). Lancet, 218, 1115.Google Scholar
Weiss, S. (1940). New Engl. J. Med. 223, 939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipple, G. H. and Robscheit-Robbins, F. S. (1942). J. exp. Med. 76, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, P. B. and King, A. (1941). Caduceus, 20, 13.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R. (1939). Publ. Hlth, Lond., 52, 314.Google Scholar
Williams, P. F. and Fralin, F. G. (1942). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 43, 1.Google Scholar
Williams, P. F., Griffith, G. C. and Fralin, F. G. (1940). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 40, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, R. S., Winn, W. W., Morris, A. T., Newsom, A. A. and Massey, W. E. (1942). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 44, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasunarni, H. (1938). Jap. J. Obstet. Gynec. 21, 239.Google Scholar
Yoakham, W. A. (1928). Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec. 15, 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziskin, D. E. (1937). J. dent. Res. 16, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziskin, D. E., Blackberg, S. N. and Stout, A. P. (1933). Suvg. Gynec. Obstet. 57, 719.Google Scholar
Ebbs, J. H., Tisdall, F. F. and Scott, W. A. (1941). J. Nutrit. 22, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joint Council of Midwifery Research Committee (1939). Interim Report upon the Nutrition Experiments in the Special Areas.Google Scholar
League of Nations Health Committee. Technical Commission (1936). Quart. Bull. Hlth Org. L.o.N. 5, 391.Google Scholar
People's League of Health (1942). Brit. med. J. ii, 77.Google Scholar
Williams, Lady, (1936). Publ. Hlth, Lond., 50, 11.Google Scholar
Davidson, H. R. (1930). J. agric. Sci. 20, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, J. (1939). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 8, 841.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H., Godden, W., Snook, L. C. and Thomson, W. (1939). J. Physiol. 97, 120.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. H. H. and Thomson, W. (1939). Scot. J. Agric. 22, 71.Google Scholar
Graham, W. R. and Smith, (1929). Report to the British Empire Marketing Board (London).Google Scholar
Hogan, A. G. and Mackenzie, F. F. (1931). Scot. J. Agric. 14, 105.Google Scholar
Jespersen, J. and Olsen, H. M. (1939). Beretn. Lab. landøkon. Forsøk., Kbh., no. 186.Google Scholar
Jespersen, J. and Olsen, N. J. H. (1939). Beretn. Lab. landøkon. Forsøk., kbh., no. 182.Google Scholar
McFarlane, W. D., Fulmer, H. L. and Jukes, T. H. (1930). Biochem. J. 24, 1611.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries (1938). Report of the Poultry Technical Committee for Great Britain. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar