Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:21:08.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GM organisms and the EU regulatory environment: allergenicity as a risk component

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2007

Howard V. Davies
Howard V. Davies
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee DD2 5DA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The European Food Safety Authority, following a request from the European Commission, has published a guidance document for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed to assist in the implementation of provisions of Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and Council on GM food and feed. This regulation has applied since 18 April 2004. In principle, hazard identification and characterisation of GM crops is conducted in four steps: characterisation of the parent crop and any hazards associated with it; characterisation of the transformation process and of the inserted recombinant DNA, including an assessment of the possible production of new fusion proteins or allergens; assessment of the introduced proteins (toxicity, allergenicity) and metabolites; identification of any other targetted and unexpected alterations in the GM crop, including changes in the plant metabolism resulting in compositional changes and assessment of their toxicological, allergenic or nutritional impact. In relation to allergenicity specifically, it is clear that this property of a given protein is not intrinsic and fully predictable but is a biological activity requiring an interaction with individuals with a predisposed genetic background. Allergenicity, therefore, depends on the genetic diversity and variability in atopic human subjects. Given this lack of complete predictability it is necessary to obtain, from several steps in the risk-assessment process, a cumulative body of evidence that minimises any uncertainty about the protein(s) in question.

Keywords

GM organismRisk assessmentAllergenicity
Type
Symposium on ‘Reacting to allergy’
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 64 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 481 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2005

References

Cellini, F, Chesson, A, Colquhoun, I, Constable, A, Davies, HV, Engel, KH et al. . (2004) Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food and Chemical Toxicology 42, 1089–1125 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2003) Report of the third session of the Codex ad hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on foods derived from biotechnology (ALINORM 03/34). Appendix IV. Proposed draft annex on the assessment of possible allergenicity of the draft guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from recombinant-DNA plants (advanced to steps 5 and 8 of the procedure). ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/alinorm03/Al03_34e.pdfGoogle Scholar
ENTRANSFOOD (2003) European network safety assessment of genetically modified food crops. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/quality-of-life/ka1/volume1/entransfood.htm Google Scholar
European Commission (2001) Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L106, 17.4.2001: 1–38Google Scholar
European Commission (2003a) Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed products. Official Journal of the European Communities L268, 1–23Google Scholar
European Commission (2003b) Regulation (EC) No 1830/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms and amending Directive 2001/18/EC. Official Journal of the European Communities L268, 24–28Google Scholar
European Food & Safety Authority (2004) Guidance document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/gmo/gmo_guidance/660/guidance_docfinal1.pdf Google Scholar
Food and, Agriculture Organization/World & Health Organization (2001) Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified foods. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on allergenicity of foods derived from biotechnology, 22–25 January 2001. ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/allergygm.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hileman, RE, Silvanovich, A, Goodman, RE, Rice, EA, Holleschak, G, Astwood, JD & Hefle, SL (2002) Bioinformatic methods for allergenicity assessment using a comprehensive allergen database. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 128, 280–291 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Life, Sciences Institute, Health and, Environmental Sciences Institute (2001) Allergenicity Assessment for Foods Derived from Genetically Modified Crops Washington, DC: ILSI HESIGoogle Scholar
James, C (2004) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2004. International Service for the Aquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications Briefs no. 32.Ithaca, NY: ISAAA; available at http://www.isaaa.org/kc/CBTNews/press_release/briefs32/ESummary/Executive%20Summary%20(English).pdf Google Scholar
King, TP, Hoffman, D, Lowenstein, H, Marsh, DG, Platts-Mills, TAE & Thomas, W (1994) Allergen nomenclature. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology 105, 224–233 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuiper, HA, Kleter, GA, Konig, A, Hammes, WP & Knudsen, I (2004) Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods. European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Food and Chemical Toxicology 42, 1043–1202 Google ScholarPubMed
Organisation for, Economic Co-operation & and Development (1986) Recombinant DNA Safety Considerations. Paris: OECD; available at http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00032000/M00032689.pdf Google Scholar
Organisation for, Economic Co-operation & and Development (1993a) Safety considerations for biotechnology: Scale-up of crop plants. http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00034000/M00034525.pdf Google Scholar
Organisation for, Economic Co-operation & and Development (1993b) Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology: concept and principles. http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00033000/M00033002.pdf Google Scholar
Task Force, of the, International Life, Sciences Institute, International Food & Biotechnology Committee (2004) Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology. http://www.ift.org/pdfs/crfsfs/crfsfsv3n2p0035-0104ms20040106.pdf Google Scholar
World Health OrganizationWorld Health Organization (2000) Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of plant origin. Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation on foods derived from biotechnology no. 29. http://www.fao.org/es/ESN/food/pdf/gmreport.pdf Google Scholar
US Office, of Science and & Technology Policy (1986) Coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology. Federal Register 51, 23302–23350 Google Scholar