Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:12:52.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of energy balance by a wild ungulate, the kudu (Tragelaphus strepsiceros) through adaptive foraging behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2008

Norman Owen-Smith
Affiliation:
Centre for African Ecology, Department of Zoology, University of the WitwatersrandWits 2050, South Africa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on ‘Mechanisms of energy compensation’
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

Begon, M., Harper, J. L., & Townsend, C. R. (1990) Ecology. Individuals, Populations and Communities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Belovsky, G. E. (1978). Diet optimization in a generalist herbivore: the moose. Theoretical Population Biology 14, 105134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belovsky, G. E. (1986). Optimal foraging and community structure: implications for a guild of generalist grassland herbivores. Oecologia 70, 3552.Google Scholar
Cooper, S. M., & Owen-Smith, N. (1985). Condensed tannins deter feeding by browsing ruminants in a South African savanna. Oecologia 67, 142146.Google Scholar
Cooper, S. M., Owen-Smith, N., & Bryant, J. P. (1988). Foliage acceptability to browsing ruminants in relation to season changes in the leaf chemistry of woody plants in a South African savanna. Oecologia 75, 336342.Google Scholar
Dunham, K. M., & Murray, M. G. (1982). The fat reserves of impala. African Journal of Ecology 20, 8187.Google Scholar
Illius, A. W., & Jessop, N. S. (1995). Modeling metabolic costs of allelochemical ingestion by foraging ungulates. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20, 693719.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P. (1968). Body composition as a basis for a comparative study of some East African mammals. In Comparative Nutrition of Wild Animals. Symposium of the Zoological Society, London no. 21, pp. 289310 [Crawford, M. A. editors]. Oxford:Blackwell.Google Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. (1993). Evaluating optimal diet models for an African browsing ruminant, the kudu: how constraining are the assumed constraints? Evolutionary Ecology 7, 499524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. (1994). Foraging responses of kudus to seasonal changes in food resources: elasticity in constraints. Ecology 75, 10501062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. & Cooper, S. M. (1987). Palatability of woody plants to browsing ruminants in a South African savanna. Ecology 68, 319331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. & Cooper, S. M. (1989). Nutritional ecology of a browsing ruminant, the kudu, through the seasonal cycle. Journal of Zoology, London 219, 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, N. & Novellie, P. (1982). What should a clever ungulate eat? American Naturalist 119, 151178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. S. (1970). Appraisal of condition estimation methods for East African ungulates. East African Wildlife Journal 8, 123129.Google Scholar
Stephens, D. W. & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging Theory Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J. & Ketelaars, J. J. M. H. (1992). Toward a new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants. 2. Costs and benefits of feed consumption: an optimization approach. Livestock Production Science 30, 297317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verlinden, C. & Wiley, R. H. (1989). The constraints of digestive rate: an alternative model of diet selection. Evolutionary Ecology 3, 264273.Google Scholar