Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:11:00.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulating High-Redshift Disk Galaxies: Applications to Long Duration Gamma-Ray Burst Hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Brant E. Robertson
Brant E. Robertson*
Affiliation:
Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, and Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 933 East 56th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA email: [email protected] Enrico Fermi Institute, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Spitzer Fellow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The efficiency of star formation governs many observable properties of the cosmological galaxy population, yet many current models of galaxy formation largely ignore the important physics of star formation and the interstellar medium (ISM). Using hydrodynamical simulations of disk galaxies that include a treatment of the molecular ISM and star formation in molecular clouds (Robertson & Kravtsov 2008), we study the influence of star formation efficiency and molecular hydrogen abundance on the properties of high-redshift galaxy populations. In this work, we focus on a model of low-mass, star forming galaxies at 1 ≲ z ≲ 2 that may host long duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Observations of GRB hosts have revealed a population of faint systems with star formation properties that often differ from Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) and more luminous high-redshift field galaxies. Observed GRB sightlines are deficient in molecular hydrogen, but it is unclear to what degree this deficiency owes to intrinsic properties of the galaxy or the impact the GRB has on its environment. We find that hydrodynamical simulations of low-stellar mass systems at high-redshifts can reproduce the observed star formation rates and efficiencies of GRB host galaxies at redshifts 1 ≲ z ≲ 2. We show that the compact structure of low-mass high-redshift GRB hosts may lead to a molecular ISM fraction of a few tenths, well above that observed in individual GRB sightlines. However, the star formation rates of observed GRB host galaxies imply molecular gas masses of 108 – 109M⊙ similar to those produced in the simulations, and may therefore imply fairly large average H2 fractions in their ISM.

Keywords

Galaxies:high-redshiftgalaxies:ISMgamma rays: bursts
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 4 , Issue S254: The Galaxy Disk in Cosmological Context , June 2008 , pp. 35 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2009

References

Berger, E., et al. 2007a, ApJ, 660, 504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, E., et al. 2007b, ApJ, 665, 102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, J. S., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 1111Google Scholar
Bullock, J. S., et al. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 559Google Scholar
Castro Cerón, J. M., et al. 2008, ApJ, submitted, arXiv:0803.2235Google Scholar
Erb, D., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 107).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferland, G., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761Google Scholar
Hernquist, L. 1990, ApJ, 356, 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541Google Scholar
Klebesadel, R. W., et al. 1973, ApJ (Letters), 182, L85).Google Scholar
Krumholz, M. R. & McKee, C. F.. 2005, ApJ, 630, 250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krumholz, M. R. & Tan, J. C.. 2007, ApJ, 654, 304Google Scholar
Le Floc'h, E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 636Google Scholar
Mathis, J. S., et al. 1983, A&A, 128, 212Google Scholar
Metzger, M. R., et al. 1997, Nature, 387, 878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mo, H. J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 295, 319Google Scholar
Navarro, J., et al. 1996a, ApJ, 462, 563Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, 989Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2008, ApJ, accepted, arXiv:0806.0399Google Scholar
Robertson, B., et al. 2006a, ApJ, 641, 21Google Scholar
Robertson, B., et al. 2006b, ApJ, 641, 90Google Scholar
Robertson, B. & Kravtsov, A. V.. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1083Google Scholar
Savaglio, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, submitted, arXiv:0803.2718Google Scholar
Springel, V., et al. 2001, New Astron., 6, 79Google Scholar
Springel, V., et al. 2005a, MNRAS, 361, 776Google Scholar
Springel, V. 2005b, MNRAS, 364, 1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumlinson, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 668, 667Google Scholar
Whalen, D., et al. 2008, ApJ, accepted, arXiv:0802.0737Google Scholar