Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:23:23.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rigid Field Hydrodynamic simulations of the magnetosphere of σ Orionis E

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2011

Nicholas R. Hill ,
Richard H. D. Townsend ,
David H. Cohen  and
Marc Gagné
Nicholas R. Hill
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Richard H. D. Townsend
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
David H. Cohen
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA
Marc Gagné
Affiliation:
Dept. of Geology and Astronomy, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present Rigid Field Hydrodynamic simulations of the magnetosphere of σ Ori E. We find that the X-ray emission from the star's magnetically confined wind shocks is very sensitive to the assumed mass-loss rate. To compare the simulations against the measured X-ray emission, we first disentangle the star from its recently discovered late-type companion using Chandra HRC-I observations. This then allows us to place an upper limit on the mass-loss rate of the primary, which we find to be significantly smaller than previously imagined.

Keywords

hydrodynamicsstars: magnetic fieldsstars: mass lossX-rays: stars
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 6 , Symposium S272: Active OB stars: structure, evolution, mass loss, and critical limits , July 2010 , pp. 194 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2011

References

Bouy, H., Huélamo, N., Martín, E. L., Marchis, F. et al. 2009, A&A, 493, 931Google Scholar
Castor, J. I., Abbott, D. C., & Klein, R. I. 1975, ApJ, 195, 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayley, K. G. 1995, ApJ, 454, 410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landstreet, J. D. & Borra, E. F. 1978, ApJ (Letters), 224, L5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanz-Forcada, J., Franciosini, E., & Pallavicini, R. 2004, A&A, 421, 715Google Scholar
Skinner, S. L., Sokal, K. R., Cohen, D. H., Gagné, M. et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, R. H. D., Owocki, S. P., & Ud-Doula, A. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ud-Doula, A. & Owocki, S. P. 2002, ApJ, 576, 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar