Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T22:04:17.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New emerging results on molecular gas, stars, and dust at z ~ 2, as revealed by low star formation rate and low stellar mass star-forming galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

Miroslava Dessauges-Zavadsky ,
Michel Zamojski ,
Daniel Schaerer ,
Françoise Combes ,
Eiichi Egami ,
Panos Sklias ,
Mark A. Swinbank ,
Johan Richard  and
Tim Rawle
Miroslava Dessauges-Zavadsky
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
Michel Zamojski
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
Daniel Schaerer
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
Françoise Combes
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Paris, LERMA, 61 Avenue de l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France
Eiichi Egami
Affiliation:
Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States
Panos Sklias
Affiliation:
Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 Chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland
Mark A. Swinbank
Affiliation:
Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
Johan Richard
Affiliation:
CRAL, Observatoire de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, 9 Avenue Ch. André, 69561 Saint Genis Laval Cedex, France
Tim Rawle
Affiliation:
ESAC, ESA, PO Box 78, Villanueva de la Canada, 28691 Madrid, Spain
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent CO surveys of star-forming galaxies (SFGs) at z ~ 2 have revolutionized our picture of massive galaxies. It is time to expand these studies toward the more common z ~ 2 SFGs with SFR < 40 M⊙ yr−1 and M* < 2.5 × 1010 M⊙. We have derived molecular gas, stars, and dust in 8 such lensed SFGs. They extend the LIR–L'CO(1-0) distribution of massive z>1 SFGs and increase the spread of the SFG star formation efficiency (SFE). A single star formation relation is found when combining all existing CO-detected galaxies. Our low-M* SFGs also reveal a SFE decrease with M* as found locally. A rise of the molecular gas fraction (fgas) with redshift is observed up to z ~ 1.6, but it severely flattens toward higher redshifts. We provide the first insight into the fgas upturn at the low-M* end 109.4 < M*/M⊙ < 1010 reaching fgas ~ 0.7, it is followed by a fgas decrease toward higher M*. Finally, we find a non-universal dust-to-gas ratio among local and high-redshift SFGs and starbursts with near-solar metallicities.

Keywords

Gravitational lensinggalaxies: evolutiongalaxies: high-redshift
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 11 , Symposium S319: Galaxies at High Redshift and Their Evolution Over Cosmic Time , August 2015 , pp. 88 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2016 

References

Béthermin, M., Daddi, E., Magdis, G., et al. 2015, A&A, 573, 113 Google Scholar
Bouché, N., Dekel, A., Genzel, R., et al. 2010, ApJ, 718, 1001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothwell, M. S., Wagg, J., Cicone, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2599 Google Scholar
Daddi, E., Dickinson, M., Morrison, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 670, 156 Google Scholar
Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Zamojski, M., Schaerer, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, 50 Google Scholar
Davé, R., Finlator, K., & Oppenheimer, B. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1354 Google Scholar
Egami, E., Rex, M., Rawle, T. D., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, 12 Google Scholar
Elbaz, D., Dickinson, M., Hwang, H. S., et al. 2011, A&A, 533, 119 Google Scholar
Gruppioni, C., Pozzi, F., Rodighiero, G., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 23 Google Scholar
Lagos, C. d. P., Baugh, C. M., Zwaan, M. A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 440, 920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obreschkow, D. & Rawlings, S. 2009, ApJL, 696, L129 Google Scholar
Magdis, G. E., Daddi, E., Béthermin, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 6 Google Scholar
Rodighiero, G., Daddi, E., Baronchelli, I., et al. 2011, ApJL, 739, L40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saintonge, A., Kauffmann, G., Wang, J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 61 Google Scholar
Saintonge, A., Lutz, D., Genzel, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, 2 Google Scholar
Scoville, N., Aussel, H., Sheth, K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 84 Google Scholar
Sklias, P., Zamojski, M., Schaerer, D., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, 149 Google Scholar
Tacconi, L. J., Neri, R., Genzel, R., et al. 2013, ApJ, 768, 74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troncoso, P., Maiolino, R., Sommariva, V., et al. 2014, A&A, 563, 58 Google Scholar