Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:25:27.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Derivation and Properties of the Angular Momentum Relative Amended Potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2024

Daniel J. Scheeres Open the ORCID record for Daniel J. Scheeres [Opens in a new window]
Daniel J. Scheeres*
Affiliation:
Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences University of Colorado Boulder
*
email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The paper concerns the determination of the Angular Momentum Relative Amended Potential (AMR potential) in the framework of the Full n-Body problem and some of its basic properties are discussed. The AMR potential is derived using two different approaches : first using a Routh reduction of the system relative to rotation about the total angular momentum, second as a variation of the Sundman Inequality, using the Cauchy inequality.

Keywords

Amended PotentialFull Body ProblemRouth Reduction
Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 18 , Symposium S382: Complex Planetary Systems II: Latest Methods for an Interdisciplinary Approach , December 2022 , pp. 41 - 50
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Greenwood, D.T.. Classical Dynamics. Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
Pollard, H.. Mathematical Introduction to Celestial Mechanics Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
Scheeres, D.J.. Minimum Energy Configurations in the N-Body Problem and the Celestial Mechanics of Granular Systems. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 113(3):291–320, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheeres, D.J. (2019). Celestial Mechanics of Rubble Pile Bodies. In: Baù, G., Celletti, A., Gales, C., Gronchi, G. (eds) Satellite Dynamics and Space Missions. Springer INdAM Series, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20633-8_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheeres, D.J.. Relative equilibria in the spherical, finite density three-body problem. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 26(5):1445–1482, 2016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheeres, D.J. and Brown, G.M.. Bounds on energy and angular momentum loss in the full n-body problem Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 135:35, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simo, JC, Lewis, D, Marsden, JE (1991) Stability of relative equilibria. Part I: the reduced energy-momentum method. Arch Ration Mech Anal 115(1):15–59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar