Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:51:52.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON STATE-INDEPENDENT IMPORTANCE SAMPLING FOR THE GI|GI|1 TANDEM QUEUE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2018

Anne Buijsrogge
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Pieter-Tjerk de Boer
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Werner R.W. Scheinhardt
Affiliation:
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, we consider a d-node GI|GI|1 tandem queue with i.i.d. inter-arrival process and service processes that are independent of each other. Our main interest is to estimate the probability to reach a high level N in a busy cycle of the system using simulation. As crude simulation does not give a sufficient precision in reasonable time, we use importance sampling. We introduce a method to find a state-independent change of measure and we show that this is equivalent to a change of measure that was earlier, but implicitly, described by Parekh and Walrand [8]. We also show that this change of measure is the only exponential state-independent change of measure that may result in an asymptotically efficient estimator. Lastly, we provide necessary conditions for this state-independent change of measure to give an asymptotically efficient estimator.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

References

1.Buijsrogge, A., de Boer, P.T., & Scheinhardt, W.R.W. (2015). A note on a state-independent change of measure for the G|G|1 tandem queue. Memorandum 2051, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente.Google Scholar
2.Buijsrogge, A., de Boer, P.T., Rosen, K. & Scheinhardt, W. (2017). Large deviations for the total queue size in non-Markovian tandem queues. Queueing Systems 85(3): 305312.Google Scholar
3.de Boer, P.T. (2006). Analysis of state-independent importance-sampling measures for the two-node tandem queue. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 16(3): 225250.Google Scholar
4.Dupuis, P. & Wang, H. (2009). Importance sampling for Jackson networks. Queueing Systems 62(1): 113157.Google Scholar
5.Dupuis, P., Sezer, A.D. & Wang, H. (2007). Dynamic importance sampling for queueing networks. Annals of Applied Probability 17(4): 13061346.Google Scholar
6.Frater, M.R. & Anderson, B.D.O. (1994). Fast simulation of buffer overflows in tandem networks of GI|GI|1 queues. Annals of Operations Research 49: 207220.Google Scholar
7.Glasserman, P. & Kou, S.G. (1995). Analysis of an importance sampling estimator for tandem queues. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation 5(1): 2242.Google Scholar
8.Parekh, S. & Walrand, J. (1989). A quick simulation method for excessive backlogs in networks of queues. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 34(1): 5466.Google Scholar
9.Sadowsky, J.S. (1991). Large deviations theory and efficient simulation of excessive backlogs in a GI|GI|m queue. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 36(12): 13831394.Google Scholar
10.Weber, R.R. (1979). The interchangeability of ·|M|1 queues in series. Journal of Applied Probability 16(3): 690695.Google Scholar