Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:20:54.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CAPITAL ALLOCATION WITH MULTIVARIATE RISK MEASURES: AN AXIOMATIC APPROACH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Linxiao Wei  and
Yijun Hu
Linxiao Wei
Affiliation:
College of Science, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei430070 People's Republic of China E-mail: [email protected]
Yijun Hu
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei430072 People's Republic of China E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Capital allocation is of central importance in portfolio management and risk-based performance measurement. Capital allocations for univariate risk measures have been extensively studied in the finance literature. In contrast to this situation, few papers dealt with capital allocations for multivariate risk measures. In this paper, we propose an axiom system for capital allocation with multivariate risk measures. We first recall the class of the positively homogeneous and subadditive multivariate risk measures, and provide the corresponding representation results. Then it is shown that for a given positively homogeneous and subadditive multivariate risk measure, there exists a capital allocation principle. Furthermore, the uniqueness of the capital allocation principe is characterized. Finally, examples are also given to derive the explicit capital allocation principles for the multivariate risk measures based on mean and standard deviation, including the multivariate mean-standard-deviation risk measures.

Keywords

capital allocation principle(financial) portfoliomultivariate risk measurepositive homogeneitysubadditivity
Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 297 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Ahmadi-Javid, A. (2012). Entropic value-at-risk: a new coherent risk measure. Journal of Optimization Theorey and Application 155: 1105–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M. & Heath, D. (1997). Thinking coherently. Risk 10: 68–71.Google Scholar
3Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M. & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical Finance 9(3): 203–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Buch, A. & Dorfleitner, G. (2008). Coherent risk measures, coherent capital allocations and the gradient allocation principle. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 42: 235–242.Google Scholar
5Burgert, C. & Rüschendorf, L. (2006). consistent risk measures for portfolio vectors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 38: 289–297.Google Scholar
6Delbaen, F. (2002). Coherent risk measures on general probability spaces. In Advances in Finance and Stochastics, Essays in Honour of Dieter Sondermann. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1–37.Google Scholar
7Denault, M. (2001). Coherent allocation of risk capital. Journal of Risk 4(1): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Deprez, O. & Gerber, H.U. (1985). On convex principles of premium calculation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 4(3): 179–189.Google Scholar
9Fischer, T. (2003). Risk capital allocation by coherent risk measures based on one-sided moments. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 32: 135–146.Google Scholar
10Föllmer, H. & Schied, A. (2002). Convex measures of risk and trading constraints. Finance and Stochastics 6: 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Föllmer, H. & Schied, A. (2004). Stochastic finance: An introduction in discrete time, 2nd ed., De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 27. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Frittelli, M. & Rosazza Gianin, E. (2002). Putting order in risk measures. Journal of Banking Finance 26: 1473–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Kalkbrener, M. (2005). An axiomatic approach to capital allocation. Mathematical Finance 15(3): 425–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Kalkbrener, M. (2009). An axiomatic characterization of capital allocations of coherent risk measures. Quantitative Finance 9(8): 961–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Karoui, N.E. & Ravanelli, C. (2009). Cash subadditive risk measures and interest rate ambiguity. Mathematical Finance 19(4): 561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7: 77–91.Google Scholar
17Rüschendorf, L. (2013). Mathematical Risk Analysis. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Tsanakas, A. (2004). Dynamic capital allocation with distortion risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 35: 223–243.Google Scholar
19Tsanakas, A. (2008). Risk measurement in the presence of background risk. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 42: 520–528.Google Scholar
20Tsanakas, A. (2009). To split or not to split: Capital allocation with convex risk measures. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 44: 268–277.Google Scholar
21Wei, L. & Hu, Y. (2014). Coherent and convex risk measures for portfolios with applications. Statistics and Probability Letters 90: 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar