Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:40:25.257Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic properties and crystal structure of Ga2−xFexO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2018

Hui Yan ,
Yuanqi Huang ,
Wei Cui ,
Yusong Zhi ,
Daoyou Guo ,
Zhenping Wu ,
Zhengwei Chen  and
Weihua Tang
Hui Yan
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Yuanqi Huang
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Wei Cui
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Yusong Zhi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Daoyou Guo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Zhenping Wu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Zhengwei Chen*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
Weihua Tang*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
b)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ga2−xFexO3 (GFO) bulks with x from 0.7 to 1.3 have been fabricated using the classic solid-state route. The structural, optical, and magnetic properties have been investigated systematically. X-ray diffraction spectra and FULLPROF profile fitting indicate that GFO bulks belong to the orthorhombic structure with the space group Pc21n. Phase separation appears at the Fe content of x = 1.3. The optical bandgap decreases almost linearly with the increase of iron content, which means that the bandgap of GFO bulks can be controlled by adjusting the Fe content in the samples. The magnetic property measurements suggest that GFO is ferromagnetic, and the magnetic properties are enhanced compared with other reported works, exhibiting the application in ferromagnetic semiconductors devices.

Keywords

Ga2−xFexO3ferromagneticorthorhombic
Type
Technical Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 195 - 201
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, S. C., Reddy, J. M., and Bernstein, J. L. (1965). “Crystal structure of piezoelectric ferromagnetic gallium iron oxide,” J. Chem. Phys. 42, 3957–3968.Google Scholar
Arima, T., Higashiyama, D., Kaneko, Y., He, J. P., Goto, T., and Miyasaka, S. (2004). “Structural and magnetoelectric properties of Ga2−xFexO3, single crystals grown by a floating-zone method,” Phys. Rev. B 70, 064426.Google Scholar
Atanelov, J. and Mohn, P. (2015). “Electronic and magnetic properties of GaFeO3: ab initio calculations for varying Fe/Ga ratio, inner cationic site disorder, and epitaxial strain,” Phys. Rev. B 92, 104408.Google Scholar
Frankel, R. B., Blum, N. A., and Foner, S. (1965) “Ferrimagnetic structure of magnetoelectric Ga2−xFexO3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 958–960.Google Scholar
Guo, D. Y., Wu, Z. P., Li, P. G., Wang, Q. J., Lei, M., Li, L. H., and Tang, W. H. (2015a). “Magnetic anisotropy and deep ultraviolet photoresponse characteristics in Ga2O3: Cr vermicular nanowire thin film nanostructure,” RSC Adv. 5, 12894–12898.Google Scholar
Guo, D. Y., Wu, Z. P., An, Y. H., Li, P. G., Wang, P. C., Chu, X. L., Guo, X. L., Zhi, Y. S., Lei, M., Li, L. H., and Tang, W. H. (2015b). “Unipolar resistive switching behavior of amorphous gallium oxide thin films for nonvolatile memory applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 042105.Google Scholar
Guo, D. Y., Wu, Z. P., Zhang, L. J., Yang, T., Hu, Q. R., Lei, M., Li, P. G., Li, L. H., and Tang, W. H. (2015c). “Abnormal bipolar resistive switching behavior in a Pt/GaO1.3/Pt structure,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 032104.Google Scholar
Guo, D. Y., An, Y. H., Cui, W., Zhi, Y. S., Zhao, X. L., Lei, M., Li, L. H., Li, P. G., Wu, Z. P., and Tang, W. H. (2016). “Epitaxial growth and magnetic properties of ultraviolet transparent Ga2O3/(Ga1–xFex)2O3 multilayer thin films,” Sci. Rep. 6, 25166.Google Scholar
Han, M. J., Ozaki, T., and Yu, J. (2007). “Magnetic ordering and exchange interactions in multiferroic GaFeO3,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 794–802.Google Scholar
Han, T. C., Chen, T. Y., and Lee, Y. C. (2013). “Grain size effect on site-disorder and magnetic properties of multiferroic GaFeO3 nanoparticles,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 232405.Google Scholar
Kalashnikova, A. M., Pisarev, R. V., Bezmaternykh, L. N., Temerov, V. L., Kirilyuk, A., and Rasing, T. (2005). “Optical and magneto-optical studies of a multiferroic GaFeO3, with a high Curie temperature,” Exp. Theor. Phys. 81, 452–457.Google Scholar
Kaneko, K., Kakeya, I., Komori, S., and Fujita, S. (2013). “Band gap and function engineering for novel functional alloy semiconductors: bloomed as magnetic properties at room temperature with α-(GaFe)2O3,” J. Appl. Phys. 113, 233901.Google Scholar
Kotsikau, D. and Ivanovskaya, M. (2015). “Influence of structure of Fe2O3-In2O3 nanocomposites on the sensitivity of thin-film sensors on their base,” Mater. Chem. Phys. 160, 337–344.Google Scholar
Levine, B. F., Nowlin, C. H., and Jones, R. V. (1968). “Magnetic properties of Ga2−xFexO3,” Phys. Rev. 174, 571–582.Google Scholar
Li, H., Bao, H. Q., Song, B., Wang, W. J., and Chen, X. L. (2008). “Observation of ferromagnetic ordering in Ni-doped AlN polycrystalline powders,” Solid State Commun. 148, 406–409.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Wang, G., Wang, S., Yang, J., Chen, L., Qin, X., Song, B., Wang, B., and Chen, X. (2011). “Defect-induced magnetism in neutron irradiated 6 H-SiC single crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 087205.Google Scholar
Muhler, M., Schuetze, J., Wesemann, M., Rayment, T., Dent, A., and Schloegl, R. (1990). “Cheminform abstract: the nature of the iron oxide-based catalyst for dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene. Part 1. Solid-state chemistry and bulk characterization,” J. Catal. 126, 339–360.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, K., Mahapatra, A. S., and Chakrabarti, P. K. (2014). “Enhanced magneto-electric property of GaFeO3 in Ga(1−x)ZnxFeO3 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.10),” Physica B 448, 214–218.Google Scholar
Naik, V. B. and Mahendiran, R. (2011). “Magnetic and magneto absorption studies in multiferroic nanoparticles,” IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 3776–3779.Google Scholar
Remeika, J. P. (1960). “GaFeO3: a ferromagnetic-piezoelectric compound,” J. Appl. Phys. 31, S263–S264.Google Scholar
Roulland, F., Lefevre, C., Thomasson, A., and Viart, N. (2013). “Study of Ga(2−x)FexO3 solid solution: optimisation of the ceramic processing,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33, 1029–1035.Google Scholar
Scott, J. F., Ross, F. M., Araujo, C., Scott, M. C., and Huffman, M. (1996). “Structure and device characteristics of SrBi2Ta2O9-based nonvolatile random-access memories,” MRS Bull. 21, 33–39.Google Scholar
Sharma, K., Raghavendra, R. V., Gupta, A., Banerjee, A., and Awasthi, A. M. (2013). “Magnetic and 57Fe Mössbauer study of magneto-electric GaFeO3 prepared by the sol-gel route,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 076002.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Dey, P., Roy, J., and Mandal, S. (2014). “Enhancement of dielectric constant in transition metal doped ZnO nanocrystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 092903.Google Scholar
Song, B., Bao, H., Li, H., Lei, M., Peng, T., Jian, J., Liu, J., Wang, W., Wang, W., and Chen, X. (2009). “Observation of glassy ferromagnetism in Al-doped 4H-SiC,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1376–1377.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A., Ibrahim, F., Lefevre, C., Autissie, E., Roullan, F., and Mény, C. (2013). “Effects of iron concentration and cationic site disorder on the optical properties of magnetoelectric gallium ferrite thin films,” RSC Adv. 3, 3124–3130.Google Scholar
Trassin, M., Viart, N., Versini, G., Loison, J. L., Vola, J. P., and Schmerber, G. (2007). “Epitaxial thin films of multiferroic GaFeO3 on conducting indium TiN oxide (001) buffered yttrium-stabilized zirconia (001) by pulsed laser deposition,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 202504.Google Scholar
Wu, Z. P., Bai, G. X., Hu, Q. R., Guo, D. Y., Sun, C. L.; Ji, L. Y., Lei, M., Li, L. H., Li, P. G., Hao, J. H., and Tang, W. H. (2015). “Effects of dopant concentration on structural and near-infrared luminescence of Nd3+-doped beta-Ga2O3 thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 171910.Google Scholar
Xiao, H. D., Ma, H. L., Xue, C. S., Zhuang, H. Z., Ma, J., and Zong, F. J. (2007). “Synthesis and structural properties of beta-gallium oxide particles from gallium nitride powder,” Mater. Chem. Phys. 101, 99–102.Google Scholar
Xu, N., Liu, L., Sun, X., Liu, X., Han, D., and Wang, Y. (2008). “Characteristics and mechanism of conduction/set process in TiN/ZnO/Pt resistance switching random-access memories,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 232112.Google Scholar
Yamashita, T. and Hayes, P. (2008). “Analysis of XPS spectra of Fe2+, and Fe3+, ions in oxide materials,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 2441–2449.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Yan et al. supplementary material 1

Yan et al. supplementary material

Download Yan et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 707.5 KB