Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:24:12.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Certification of Standard Reference Material 1976B

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2015

David R. Black ,
Donald Windover ,
Marcus H. Mendenhall ,
Albert Henins ,
James Filliben  and
James P. Cline
David R. Black*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Donald Windover
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Marcus H. Mendenhall
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
Albert Henins
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
James Filliben
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
James P. Cline
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) certifies a suite of Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) to address specific aspects of the performance of X-ray powder diffraction instruments. This report describes SRM 1976b, the third generation of this powder diffraction SRM. SRM 1976b consists of a sintered alumina disc, approximately 25.6 mm in diameter by 2.2 mm in thickness, intended for use in the calibration of X-ray powder diffraction equipment with respect to line position and intensity as a function of 2θ-angle. The sintered form of the SRM eliminates the effect of sample loading procedures on intensity measurements. Certified data include the lattice parameters and relative peak intensity values from 13 lines in the 2θ region between 20° and 145° using CuKα radiation. A NIST-built diffractometer, incorporating many advanced and unique design features was used to make the certification measurements.

Keywords

Standard Reference MaterialX-ray diffractioncertificationlattice parameterdiffractometer
Type
Technical Articles
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 199 - 204
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azaroff, L. V. (1955). “Polarization correction for crystal-monochromatized x-radiation,” Acta Crystallogr. 8, 701–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, J., Kleeberg, R., Haase, A., and Breidenstein, B. (2000). “Advanced Fundamental Parameters Model for Improved Profile Analysis,” in Proc. of the 5th European Conf. on Residual Stresses, Delft-Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands, September 29–30, 1999, edited by Böttger, A. J., Delhez, R. and Mittemeijer, E. J. (Material Science Forum), Vol. 347–349, pp. 303–308.Google Scholar
Black, D. R., Windover, D., Henins, A., Filliben, J., and Cline, J. P. (2011). “Certification of standard reference material 660B,” Powder Diffr. 26(2), 155–158.Google Scholar
Cheary, R. W. and Coelho, A. A. (1992). “A fundamental parameters approach to X-ray line-profile fitting,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheary, R. W. and Coelho, A. A. (1998a). “Axial divergence in a conventional x-ray powder diffractometer I. theoretical foundations,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 31, 851–861.Google Scholar
Cheary, R. W. and Coelho, A. A. (1998b). “Axial divergence in a conventional x-ray powder diffractometer II. implementation and comparison with experiment,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 31, 862–868.Google Scholar
Cline, J. P., Black, D., Windover, D., and Henins, A. (2013). “The Calibration of Laboratory X-Ray Diffraction Equipment Using NIST Standard Reference Materials, Chapter 13,” in Modern Diffraction Methods, edited by Mittemeijer, E. J. and Welzel, U. (Wilcy-VCH, Weinheim, Germany), pp. 399–438.Google Scholar
Cline, J. P., Mendenhall, M. H., Black, D., Windover, D., and Henins, A. (2015). “The optics, alignment and calibration of laboratory X-ray powder diffraction equipment with the use of NIST standard reference materials,” Int. Tables Crystallogr. H: Powder Diffraction , in press.Google Scholar
Finger, L. W., Cox, D. E., and Jephcoat, A. P. (1994). “A correction for powder diffraction peak asymmetry due to axial divergence,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 27, 892–900.Google Scholar
Guinier, A. (1994). X-Ray Diffraction in Crystals, Imperfect Crystals, and Amorphous Bodies (Courier Dover Publications, N. Chelmsford, Massachusetts).Google Scholar
HighScore Plus. V3.0d PANalytical (BV Almelo, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
Hölzer, G., Fritsch, M., Deutsch, M., Härtwig, J., and Förster, E. (1997). “Kα1,2 and Kβ1,3 x-ry emission lines of the 3d transition metals,” Phys. Rev. A 56(6), 4554–4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO (1993). Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement; ISBN 92-67-10188-9 (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland), 1st ed. Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1992). Round Robin on Powder Diffractometer Sensitivity; ICDD Workshop at the Conference Accuracy in Powder Diffraction II; NIST Gaithersburg, May 26–29.Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. and Von Dreele, R. B. (2003). General Structure Analysis System (GSAS); Report LAUR 86–748 (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico).Google Scholar
Maskil, M. and Deutsch, M. (1988). “X-ray Kα satellites of copper,” Phys. Rev. A 38, 3467–3472.Google Scholar
Rietveld, H. M. (1967). “Line profiles of neutron powder-diffraction peaks for structure refinement,” Acta Crystallogr. 22, 151–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, H. M. (1969). “A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2, 65–71.Google Scholar
Shvyd'ko, Yu. V., Lucht, M., Gerdaua, E., Lerche, M., Alp, E. E., Sturhahn, W., Sutter, J., and Toellner, T. S. (2002). “Measuring wavelengths and lattice constants with the mossbauer wavelength standard,” J. Synchr. Radiat. 9, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SRM 660b (2009). Line Position and Line Shape Standard for Powder Diffraction (National Institute of Standards and Technology; U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD).Google Scholar
SRM 676a (2008). Alumina Internal Standard for Quantitative Analysis by Powder Diffraction (National Institute of Standards and Technology; U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD).Google Scholar
Taylor, B. N. (1995). Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) (NIST Special Publication 811; U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
TOPAS. (2009). General Profile and Structure Analysis Software for Powder Diffraction Data, V4.2, (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany).Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Cox, D. E., and Hastings, J. B. (1987). “Rietveld refinement of Debye-Scherrer synchrotron X-ray data from Al2O3 ,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20, 79–83.Google Scholar
Yao, T. and Jinno, H. (1982). “Polarization factor for the X-ray powder diffraction method with a single crystal monochromator,” Acta Crystallogr. A 38, 287–288.Google Scholar