Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:23:30.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical/Biological Terrorism: How Serious a Risk?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Graham S. Pearson*
Affiliation:
University of Bradford, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Roundtable Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

CWC Bulletin (1996). “Criminalizing BW.” Chemical Weapons Convention Bulletin Issue No. 31 (March):1.Google Scholar
Danzig, R. (1996). “Biological Warfare: A Nation at Risk—A Time to Act.” INSS Strategic Forum 58 (January):14. Washington, DC: National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Geissler, E. (1995). “ProCEID: Programme for Countering Emerging Infectious Diseases (ProCEID) by Prophylactic, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Measures”. The ASA Newsletter, 95-5 (October 11):1213. (See alsoGeissler, E. and Pearson, G., “Growing Support for ProCEID,” The ASA Newsletter, 95–4 (August 10, 1995)1, 14.)Google Scholar
HMSO (1974). “Biological Weapons Act 1974.” Norwich, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Lowe, K., Pearson, G., and Utgoff, V. (1995). “Potential Values of a Simple BW Protective Mask.” IDA Paper P-3077 (September). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.Google Scholar
Official Record (1995). Hansard, column 93/4, July 3. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
World Health Assembly (1995). “Communicable Diseases Prevention and Control: New, Emerging, and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases.” Forty-eighth World Assembly, Agenda Item 19, May 12, Document WHA48.13.Google Scholar