Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:35:18.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Physician-Assisted Death: California's Proposition 161 and Attitudes of the Elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Nina Clark  and
Phoebe S. Liebig
Nina Clark
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, USA
Phoebe S. Liebig
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, USA
Get access

Abstract

Physician-assisted death is a particularly relevant subject for the elderly since end-of-life issues affect them sooner rather than later. This article examines both the macro (aging interest group) and micro (individual) advocacy levels, using Proposition 161, The California Death With Dignity Act, as a case study. To determine old-age interest group attitudes and activism, we explored their advocacy levels on the ballot measure. Public opinion polls and a survey that was administered exactly one week prior to the November 1992 election at the Pasadena Senior Center in Pasadena, California helped measure individual attitudes and beliefs regarding active euthanasia.

Type
Physician-Assisted Suicide
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , September 1996 , pp. 273 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binstock, R.H. (1972). “Interest Group Liberalism and the Politics of Aging.” The Gerontologist (Part 1): 265–88.Google Scholar
Binstock, R.H. (1995). “Health Care Policy and Older Americans.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Browne, W.P. (1985). “Variations on the Behavior and Style of State Lobbyists and Interest Groups.” Journal of Politics 47:450–66.Google Scholar
Callahan, D. (1987). Setting Limits: Medical Goals in an Aging Society. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., and Stokes, D.E. (1960). The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Carpenter, B.D. (1993). “A Review and New Look at Ethical Suicide in Advanced Age.” The Gerontologist 33:359–66.Google Scholar
Chen, E. (1993). “Reality Deepens Hillary Clinton's Cause.” Los Angeles Times (March 7):A1.Google Scholar
Day, C. (1990). What Older Americans Think: Interest Groups and Aging Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, D. (1983). “The Elderly as a Political Force.” In Browne, W.P. and Olson, L.K. (eds.), Aging and Public Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Field, M. and DiCamillo, M. (1992). The Field Poll. San Francisco, CA: The Field Institute.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. (1978). The Gallup Poll. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. (1992). The Gallup Poll. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Glick, H. (1991). “The Right to Die: State Policymaking and the Elderly.” Journal of Aging Studies 5:283–307.Google Scholar
Glick, H. (1992). The Right to Die: Policy Innovation and Its Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Humphry, D. (1991). Final Exit. New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Humphry, D. (1993). Lawful Exit. Junction City, OR: Norris Lane Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, P. (1992). “Outcome of Death Measure May Rest on 11th-Hour Ads.” Los Angeles Times (October 28): A1, A16.Google Scholar
Lammers, W.W. (1983). Public Policy and the Aging. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Leinbach, R.L. (1993). “Euthanasia Attitudes of Older Persons.” Research on Aging 15:433–44.Google Scholar
Liebig, P.S. (1992). “Federalism and Aging Policy in the 1980s: Implications for Changing Interest Group Roles in the 1990s.” Journal of Aging Social Policy 4(1/2):17–33.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (1986). Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, A.H., Gurin, P., and Gurin, G. (1980). “Age Consciousness and Political Mobilization of Older Americans.” Gerontologist 20:691–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N., Verba, S., and Petrocik, J. (1976). The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
“Newsbriefs.” (1992). Aging Today 13(6):2.Google Scholar
Nuland, S.B. (1994). How We Die: Reflections on Life's Final Chapter. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Post, S.G. (1993). “How Shall the Aged Die?” The Gerontologist 33:427–22.Google Scholar
Pratt, H.J. (1976). The Gray Lobby. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
In re Quinlan (1976). 97 N.J. S. Ct. 319.Google Scholar
Saul, S. and Saul, S. (1977). “Old People Talk about the Right to Die.” Omega 8:129–33.Google Scholar
Saul, S. and Saul, S. (1988). “Old People Talk about Suicide: A Discussion about Suicide in a Long-Term Care Facility for Frail and Elderly People.” Omega 19:237–55.Google Scholar
Tatalovich, R. (1988). “Abortion.” In Tatalovich, R. and Daynes, B.W. (eds.), Social Regulatory Policy. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Thomas, C.S. and Hrebnar, R.J. (1990). “Interest Groups in the States.” In Gray, V., Jacob, H., and Albritton, R.B. (eds.), Politics in the America States. 5th edition. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Van Tassel, D.D. and Meyer, J.E.W. (1992). Aging Interest Policy Groups. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Wisensale, S.K. and Allison, M.D. (1988). “An Analysis of 1987 State Family Leave Legislation: Implications for Caregivers of the Elderly.” The Gerontologist 28:779–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolman, H. and Teitelbaum, F. (1985). “Interest Groups and the Reagan Presidency.” In Salamon, L. and Lund, M. (eds.), The Reagan Presidency and the Governing of America. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar