Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:40:33.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Business do Businesses Have with the Free Exercise of Religion?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

Judith Lynn Failer
Judith Lynn Failer*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Prof. Judith Lynn Failer, Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, Woodburn 210, Bloomington, Indiana 47405-7110, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014), federal and state religious freedom restoration acts now extend the right to free exercise of religion to businesses. But what does it mean for businesses to have such a right? In this paper, I identify three implications of these new rights: they shift the burden for fulfilling the right to private citizens, and they conflict with businesses’ both commercial and democratic obligations. To illustrate how they become problematic, I draw on the case of In re Wathen (2015) where the owners of a bed and breakfast cited their business's religion as their reason for refusing to host a wedding reception for a same-sex couple, even though state law specifically prohibited commercial businesses from discriminating based on sexual orientation.

Type
Article
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 171 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I gratefully acknowledge the wise advice I received while preparing this paper from Suzanne Dovi, David Orentlicher, Nick Tampio, and the anonymous reviewers. Remaining mistakes are all my own.

References

REFERENCES

Bank of the United States v. Deveaux. 1809. 9 US 61.Google Scholar
Boerne v. Flores. 1997. 521 U.S. 507.Google Scholar
Braunfeld v. Brown. 1961. 366 U.S. 599.Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo. 1976. 424 US 1.Google Scholar
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. 2014. 573 U.S.__.Google Scholar
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah. 1993. 508 U.S. 520.Google Scholar
Churchill, Spencer. 2014. “Whose Religion Matters in Corporate RFRA Claims After Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014).” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 38(1):437.Google Scholar
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. 2010. 558 U.S. 310.Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act. 1964. Title VII. Sec. 201(a).Google Scholar
Cook, Tony, and Wang, Stephanie. 2015. “Indiana House Panel Oks Religious Freedom Bill.” Indianapolis Star, March 16. http://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2015/03/16/foes-plan-rally-hearing-religious-freedom-bill/24838563/Google Scholar
Day, Terri R., and Weatherby, Danielle. 2017. “Contemplating Masterpiece Cakeshop.” 74 Washington & Lee Law Review Online 86.Google Scholar
Employment Division v. Smith. 1990. 494 U.S. 872.Google Scholar
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti. 1978. 435 U.S. 765.Google Scholar
Fox News. 2016. “Illinois Couple Defiant Despite $80 G Fine for Refusing Gay Union and B&B.” http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/04/05/Illinois-couple-defiant-despite-80g-fine-for-refusing-gay-union-at-b-b.html. April 5.Google Scholar
Goldman v. Weinberger. 1986. 475 U.S. 503.Google Scholar
Gonzales v Raich. 2005. 545 US 1.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 2013. “Religious Toleration and Claims of Conscience.” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 21:449.Google Scholar
Grosjean v. American Press Company, Inc. 1936. 297 U.S. 233.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into A Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hausknecht, Bruce. 2013. “Religious Freedom in Danger: The Religious Freedom Restoration Act.” https://www.focusonthefamily.com/socialissues/religious-freedom/religious-freedom-in-danger/the-religious-freedom-restoration-act (Accessed October 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S. 1964. 379 U.S. 241.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb. 1917. “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning.” The Yale Law Journal 26(8).Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2017. Public Things: Democracy in Disrepair. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Illinois Statutes. Chapter 775. Human Rights § 5/5-102(A).Google Scholar
In re Wathen, State of Illinois Human Rights Commission. 2015. Charge No. 2011SP2489 and 2011SP2488, ALS No. 11-0703C, “Recommended Liability Determination.”Google Scholar
Jamison v. Texas. 1943. 318 U.S. 413.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 1998. Antidiscrimination Law and Social Equality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 2015. “Gay Rights, Religious Accommodations, and the Purposes of Antidiscrimination Law.” Southern California Law Review 88:619.Google Scholar
Lochner v. New York. 1905. 198 U.S. 45.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1970. Second Treatise of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luchenister, Alex J. 2015. “A New Era of Inequality: Hobby Lobby and Religious Exemptions From Anti-Discrimination Law.” Harvard Law & Policy Review 9:63.Google Scholar
Lupu, Ira C. 1989. “Where Rights Begin: The Problem of Burdens on the Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 102(5).Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1785. “Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments.” Quoted in Thomas C. Berg, “The Heritage Guide to the Constitution: Free Exercise of Religion.” http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/amendments/1/essays/139/free-exercise-of-religion (Accessed October 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Marsh v. Alabama. 1946. 326 U.S. 501Google Scholar
Martin v. Struthers. 1942. 319 U.S. 141.Google Scholar
Martin v. Struthers. 1943. 319 U.S. 141.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. 1990. “The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion.” Harvard Law Review 103(7).Google Scholar
McGowan v. Maryland. 1961. 366 U.S. 420.Google Scholar
Muller v. Oregon. 1908. 208 U.S. 412.Google Scholar
Nejaime, Douglas, and Siegel, Reva B.. 2015. “Conscience Wars: Complicity-Based Conscience Claims in Religion and Politics.” The Yale Law Journal 124:2516.Google Scholar
Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining Company v. Pennsylvania. 1888. 125 U.S. 181.Google Scholar
Pohlman, H.L. 2005. Constitutional Debate in Action, Civil Rights and Liberties. 2nd ed. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Reynolds v. U.S. 1879. 909 U.S. 145.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Ray. 2016 “Why the Onslaught of Religious Freedom Laws?” http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/06/us/religious-freedom-laws-why-now/index.html (Accessed October 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company. 1886. 118 US 394.Google Scholar
Sepinwall, Amy J. 2015. “Conscience and Complicity: Assessing Pleas for Religious Exemptions in Hobby Lobby‘s Wake.” The University of Chicago Law Review 1897 82(4), 1897.Google Scholar
Sepper, Elizabeth. 2015. “Gays in the Moralized Marketplace.” Alabama Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review 7:129.Google Scholar
Sherbert v. Verner. 1963. 374 U.S. 398.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1998. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Joseph William. 2017. “Property and Sovereignty Imbricated: Why Religion Is Not an Excuse to Discriminate in Public Accommodations.” Theoretical Inquiries in the Law 18(2).Google Scholar
Smith, Steven D. 2014. “Die and Let Live? The Asymmetry of Accommodation.” Southern California Law Review 88:703.Google Scholar
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. Pub. L. No. 103-141, 107 Stat. 1488 (November 16, 1993), codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb through 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-4.Google Scholar
United States Constitution.Google Scholar
West Coast Hotel v. Parrish. 1937. 300 U.S. 379.Google Scholar
West Virginia v. Barnette. 1943. 319 U.S. 624.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robin Fretwell. 2014. “When Governments Insulate Dissenters From Social Change: What Hobby Lobby and Abortion Conscience Clauses Teach About Specific Exemptions.” University of California, Davis Law Review 48:703.Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam. 2018. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights. New York: Liveright, Norton.Google Scholar
Wisconsin v. Yoder. 1972. 406 U.S. 205.Google Scholar