Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:00:16.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Political Viability, Contestation and Power: Islam and Politics in Indonesia and Malaysia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2009

Amy L. Freedman*
Affiliation:
CW Post, Long Island University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Amy L. Freedman, Political Science Department, CW Post, Long Island University, 720 Northern Blvd. Brookville, NY 11548. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This article explores the impact of Muslim organizations and Muslim political parties in Indonesia and Malaysia and their relationship to democracy. Questions addressed are as follows: How does the political system (broadly described) facilitate or constrain the goals of various Muslim organizations (both groups in society and political parties)? What roles do these Muslim organizations play in impacting politics and where (or in what areas of) in the political process are they most effective? Under what circumstances have Muslim associations and/or parties been a force for (or antagonistic to) democratization? Given the ethnic and regional diversity in Malaysia and Indonesia, the initial hypotheses for these questions are as follows: under authoritarian and semi-authoritarian rule Muslim organizations actually have greater opportunities to polarize rhetoric as they appeal to citizens based on claims of moral supremacy, fulfillment of social welfare needs, and some level of criticism of a restricted or corrupted political order. At different times the Pan-Malayan Islamic Association (PAS), the leading Muslim party in Malaysia (and a dominant opposition party) has had limited appeal to voters. Under more democratic conditions, Islamic groups or parties may need to moderate their appeals, and/or build coalitions with secular or non-Islamic groups in order to win power and influence in the larger political system. Muslim political parties exist in both Malaysia and Indonesia; their power and influence have varied over time. This project aims to explain why these parties have had more support at some times than others and under what conditions they may moderate their demands and policy choices to accommodate pluralist leanings.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abuza, Zachary. 2003. Militant Islam in Southeast Asia Crucible of Terror. Boulder, Co: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abuza, Zachary. 2006a. “Malaysia Announces the Arrest of 12 Darul Islam Members.” Terrorism Focus 3:34.Google Scholar
Abuza, Zachary. 2006b. “MMI Concludes its First Congress since the Release of Abu Bakar Ba'asyir.” Counterterrorism Blog http://counterterrorismblog.org/2006/07. (Accessed July 27, 2006).Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1988. “The Return to the State.” The American Political Science A Review 82:853885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International. 2005. “Information on Human Rights in Malaysia.” http://www.web.amnesty.org/report2005. (Access July 27, 2006).Google Scholar
Barton, Greg. 2002. Gus Dur: The Authorized Biography of Abdurrahman Wahid. Jakarta, Indonesia: Equinox Publications.Google Scholar
Chance, David. 2008. “Malaysia's Islamists Endorse Answar.” Reuters Africa http://africa.reuters.com/world/news/usnSP55161.html. (Accessed August 27, 2008).Google Scholar
Cohen, Margot. 1998. “Turning Point.” Far Eastern Economic Review July 30.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1994. “Rethinking Civil Society: Toward Democratic Consolidation.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, C. Van. 1981. Rebellion under the Banner of Islam: The Darul Islam in Indonesia. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Miriam Fendius, and Warner, Carolyn M. 2008. “Democracy, Security, and Religious Political Parties: A Framework for Analysis.” Asian Security 4:122.Google Scholar
Keenan, Faith. ed. 1998. “Far Eastern Economic Review.” In The Aftershock: How and Economic Earthquake is Rattling Southeast Asian Politics. Hong Kong: FEER. 2263.Google Scholar
Freedman, Amy. 2000. Political Participation and Ethnic Minorities: Chinese Overseas in Malaysia, Indonesia, and The United States. London, UK: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, Amy. 2006. Political Change and Consolidation: Democracy's Rocky Road in Thailand, South Korea, Indonesia and Malaysia. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuad, Muhammad. 2003. “Limits to Islamic Radicalism in Indonesia.” http://www.india-seminar.com/2003/527/527%20muhammad%20fuad.htm. (Accessed June 16, 2006).Google Scholar
Funston, John. 2000. “Malaysia's Tenth Elections: Status Quo, Reformasi or Islamization?Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 22:2260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indonesia General Election Commission. 2001. Analyzing Indonesia's Election, 1999. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesian General Election Commission.Google Scholar
Hamayotsu, Kikue. 2002. “Islam and Nation Building in Southeast Asia: Malaysia and Indonesia in Comparative Perspective.” Pacific Affairs 75:357358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamid, Ahmad Fauzi Abdul. 2003. “Inter-Movement Tension among Resurgent Muslims in Malaysia: Response to the State Clampdown on Darul Arqam in 1994.” Asian Studies Review 27:361387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hefner, Robert. 2000. Civil Islam Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1984. “Will More Countries Become Democratic?” Political Science Quarterly 99:193218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2005. “Recycling Militants in Indonesia: Darul Islam and the Australian Embassy Bombing.” Asia Report 92:138. Journal of Democracy 5:4–17.Google Scholar
King, Dwight. 2003. Half-Hearted Reform: Electoral Institutions and the Struggle for Democracy in Indonesia. Westport, CT: Praeger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kua, Ann Munro. 1996. Authoritarian Populism in Malaysia. New York, NY: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, Chetan 2005. “Experts: SE Asia's Islam Peaceful.” United Press International Perspectives June 6.Google Scholar
Liow, Joseph Chinyong. 2004. “The Mahathir Administration's War against Islamic Militancy: Operational and Ideological Challenges.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 58:241256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour. 1983. Political Man: The Social Bases of Democracy. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Madjid, Nurcholish. 2004. “Indonesian Muslims Enter a New Age.” In Islamic Perspectives at the New Millennium, eds. Hooker, Virginia and Saikal, Amin. Singapore: ISEAS.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy 1991. “The Limits of the State.” American Political Science Review 85:7796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noor, Farish A. 2003. “Blood, Sweat and Jihad: The Radicalization of the Political Discourse of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party (PAS) from 1982 Onwards.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 25:200232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noor, Farish A. 2007. “Stirring the ‘Militant Islam’ Bugbear Again?” The Other Malaysia www.othermalaysia.org/content/view/89/55. (Accessed June 27, 2008).Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric. 1988. “The Return to the State: Critiques.” The American Political Science Review 82:853885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 1995. “On Civil Society and the Consolidation of Democracy: Ten General Propositions and Nine Speculations about their Relation in Asian Societies.” Presented at an International Conference on Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Trends and ChallengesTaipei.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe, and Lynn Karl, Terry. 1991. “What Democracy is… And Is Not.” Journal of Democracy Summer:6773.Google Scholar
Sidel, John. 2007. Riots, Pogroms and Jihad. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vatikiotis, Michael. 2006. “Why Indonesia Needs a New Politics.” International Herald Tribune www.iht.com. (Accessed June 19, 2008).Google Scholar
Verma, Vidhu. 2002. Malaysia: State and Civil Society in Transition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Meredith. 2005. Protest and Possibilities: Civil Society and Coalitions for Political Change in Malaysia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19971101faessay3809/fareed-zakaria/the-rise-of-illiberal-democracy.html. (Accessed July 12, 2008).Google Scholar