Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:27:33.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Patterns of Political Secularism in Italy and Turkey: The Vatican and the Diyanet to the Test of Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

Luca Ozzano*
Affiliation:
Università di Torino (Turin)
Chiara Maritato*
Affiliation:
Università di Torino University of Graz
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Luca Ozzano, Dipartimento di culture, politica e società, Università di Torino, Lungo Dora Siena 100, Torino, TO, 10153, Italy. E-mail: [email protected];
Chiara Maritato, Università di Torino, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]; University of Graz, Austria. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

For centuries, Rome and Istanbul have been representing and epitomizing two empires and two entities with both significant spiritual and temporal power: the Papacy and the Caliphate. During the 19th and the 20th centuries, these institutions underwent significant changes in a context of state secularization: in the case of the Papacy, there was a loss of temporal power and its “reduction” to a mainly moral authority; the Caliphate, on the other hand, was abolished after World War I, succeeded by the Presidency of Religious Affairs (Diyanet), a bureaucratic body under state control, founded in the era of Kemalist secularism. Despite these changes, today both institutions still play a significant role in the public life and public policies of the Italian and the Turkish republics. While the Vatican is able to influence the Italian public sphere and public discourse through both its influence on common people and its lobbying activities in relation to political decision-makers, in Turkey the Diyanet has become the main tool in the reshaping of Turkish society (both by the Kemalists and, later, by Erdoğan's AKP). This paper will analyze their influence on the two countries’ public policies in relation to religious pluralism and to family-related issues, to show how different ideas of secularism, institutional arrangements, and historical paths have led to a very different role of the two institutions in the Italian and Turkish political systems.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akkoyunlu, Karabekir, and Öktem, Kerem. 2016. “Existential Insecurity and the Making of a Weak Authoritarian Regime in Turkey.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16(4):505527.10.1080/14683857.2016.1253225Google Scholar
Allievi, Stefano. 2009. Conflicts Over Mosques in Europe: Policy Issues and Trends. London: Alliance Publishing Trust.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. 1948. “The Political Ideas of Christian Democracy.” The Journal of Politics 10(4):734763.10.2307/2126252Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. 1st ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804783095Google Scholar
Bailey, Tom. 2013. “Postsecular Democracy? Habermas and Rawls on Religion.” Article Presented at the Italian Political Science Association's Conference (SISP).Google Scholar
Bardakçi, Mehmet. 2015. “The Alevi Opening of the AKP Government in Turkey: Walking a Tightrope Between Democracy and Identity.” Turkish Studies 16(3):349370.10.1080/14683849.2015.1050959Google Scholar
Bardakci, Mehmet, Freyberg-Inan, Annette, Giesel, Christoph, Leisse, Olaf, and Bardakçi, Mehmet. 2016. Religious Minorities in Turkey: Alevi, Armenians, and Syriacs and the Struggle to Desecuritize Religious Freedom. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Bardakoğlu, Ali. 2009. Religion and Society. New Perspectives from Turkey. Ankara: Diyanet Işleri Başkanliği Yayinlari.Google Scholar
Başer, Bahar, and Erdi Öztürk, Ahmet. 2017. Authoritarian Politics in Turkey: Elections, Resistance and the AKP. New York: I.B.Tauris.10.5040/9781350985438Google Scholar
Berkes, Niyazi. 1998. The Development of Secularism in Turkey. Milton Park Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Bertezzolo, Paolo. 2011. Padroni a chiesa nostra. Vent'anni di strategia religiosa della Lega Nord. Bologna: EMI.Google Scholar
Bhargava, Rajeev. 2006. Political Secularism: Why It Is Needed and Why We Need to Learn Form Its Distinctive Indian Version. Edited by Rehberg, Karl-Siegbert. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verl., 361377.Google Scholar
Birtek, Faruk, and Binnaz, Toprak. 2011. “The Conflictual Agendas of Neo-Liberal Reconstruction and the Rise of Islamic Politics in Turkey: The Hazard of Rewriting Modernity.” In The Post-Modern Abyss and the New Politics of Islam: Assabiyah Revisited, eds. Birtek, Faruk and Binnaz, Toprak. Essays in Honor of Şerif Mardin. Istanbul: Bilgi University Press, 1335.Google Scholar
Bombardieri, Maria. 2011. Moschee d'Italia. Il diritto al luogo di culto. Il dibattito sociale e politico. Bologna: EMI.Google Scholar
Bornschier, Simon. 2010. “The New Cultural Divide and the Two-Dimensional Political Space in Western Europe.” West European Politics 33(3):419444.10.1080/01402381003654387Google Scholar
Burchardt, Marian, and Wohlrab-Sahr, Monika. 2013. “Multiple Secularities: Religion and Modernity in the Global Age.” International Sociology 28(6):605611.10.1177/0268580913510540Google Scholar
Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226190204.001.0001Google Scholar
Coppa, Frank J. 1995. “From Liberalism to Fascism: The Church-State Conflict Over Italy's Schools.” The History Teacher 28(2):135148.10.2307/494482Google Scholar
Davison, Andrew. 2003. “Turkey, a ‘Secular’ State?: The Challenge of Description.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 102(2):333–50.10.1215/00382876-102-2-3-333Google Scholar
Diamanti, Ilvo. 2009. Mappe dell'Italia politica: bianco, rosso, verde, azzurro-- e tricolore. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino.Google Scholar
Diamanti, Ilvo, and Ceccarini, Luigi. 2007. “Catholics and Politics After the Christian Democrats: The Influential Minority.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 12(1):3759.10.1080/13545710601132912Google Scholar
Eligür, Banu. 2010. The Mobilization of Political Islam in Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511711923Google Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt, and Madeley, John T. S.. 2004. Church and State in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203493847Google Scholar
Faggioli, Massimo. 2008. Breve Storia Dei Movimenti Cattolici. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Faggioli, Massimo. 2016. The Rising Laity: Ecclesial Movements Since Vatican II. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 2015. Political Secularism, Religion, and the State: A Time Series Analysis of Worldwide Data. Cambridge, England; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139924610Google Scholar
Galli, Giorgio. 2004. I Partiti Politici Italiani (1943-2004). Milano: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Garelli, Franco. 2006. L'Italia Cattolica Nell'epoca Del Pluralismo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Garelli, Franco. 2007. La Chiesa in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alberta. 2013. “Ahab and the White Whale: The Contemporary Debate Around the Forms of Catholic Political Commitment in Italy.” Democratization 20(5):895916.10.1080/13510347.2013.801257Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alberta, and Polizzi, Emanuele. 2015. “Communion and Liberation: A Catholic Movement in a Multilevel Governance Perspective.” Religion, State and Society 43(2):133149.10.1080/09637494.2015.1062600Google Scholar
Gözaydın, İstar B. 2008. “Diyanet and Politics.” The Muslim World 98(2–3):216227.10.1111/j.1478-1913.2008.00220.xGoogle Scholar
Gözaydın, İstar B. 2009. Diyanet - Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'nde Dinin Tanzimi. Istanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık.Google Scholar
Gözaydın, İstar B. 2014. “Diyanet and Politics.” Ispi online. Accessed December 22. http://www.ispionline.it/it/documents/Religioni/Gozaydin_Diyanet%20and%20Politics.pdf.Google Scholar
Guolo, Renzo. 2011. Chi impugna la croce. Lega e Chiesa. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Haynes, Jeffrey. 1997. “Religion, Secularisation and Politics: A Postmodern Conspectus.” Third World Quarterly 18(4):709728.10.1080/01436599714722Google Scholar
Haynes, Jeffrey. 2007. An Introduction to International Relations and Religion. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Ney York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Kepel, Gilles. 1991. La revanche de Dieu: chrétiens, juifs et musulmans à la reconquête du monde. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Kocamaner, Hikmet. 2017. “Delinquent Kids, Revolutionary Mothers, Uncle Governor, and Erdogan the Patriarch: The Gezi Park Protests and Politics of the Family in Turkey (Part I).” Jadaliyya. Accessed March 6. https://www.academia.edu/4176512/Delinquent_Kids_Revolutionary_Mothers_Uncle_Governor_and_Erdogan_the_Patriarch_The_Gezi_Park_Protests_and_Politics_of_the_Family_in_Turkey_Part_I_.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, Dolezal, Martin, Bornschier, Simon, and Frey, Timotheos. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790720Google Scholar
Kuru, Ahmet T. 2007. “Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies Toward Religion.” World Politics 59(4):568594.10.1353/wp.2008.0005Google Scholar
Kuru, Ahmet T. 2009. Secularism and State Policies Toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815096Google Scholar
Lascoumes, Pierre, and Le Galès, Patrick. 2005. Gouverner Par Les Instruments. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Lüküslü, Demet. 2016. “Creating a Pious Generation: Youth and Education Policies of the AKP in Turkey.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16(4):637649.10.1080/14683857.2016.1243332Google Scholar
Lyon, Margot. 1967. “Christian-Democratic Parties and Politics.” Journal of Contemporary History 2(4):6987.10.1177/002200946700200407Google Scholar
Magister, Sandro. 2001. Chiesa extraparlamentare: il trionfo del pulpito nell'età postdemocristiana. Napoli: L'ancora del Mediterraneo.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2009. “Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide?Critical Inquiry 35(4):836862.10.1086/599592Google Scholar
Mardin, Şerif Arif. 1973. “Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, ISSN 0011-5266, ZDB-ID 16482. - 102(1):169190.Google Scholar
Maritato, Chiara. 2016. “Reassessing Women, Religion and the Turkish Secular State in the Light of the Professionalisation of Female Preachers (Vaizeler) in Istanbul.” Religion, State and Society 44(3):258275.10.1080/09637494.2016.1204168Google Scholar
Martino, Simone C., and Ricucci, Roberta. 2016. “Chi è il giudice più severo? La popolarità di Papa Francesco fra rappresentazione dei media e sentimenti giovanili.Rassegna Italiana Di Sociologia 4:745774.Google Scholar
Menozzi, Davide. 1997. “La Chiesa Cattolica.” In Storia Del Cristianesimo. IV. L'età Contemporanea, eds Filoramo, Giovanni and Menozzi, Davide. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 131257.Google Scholar
Moos, Malcolm. 1945. “Don Luigi Sturzo--Christian Democrat.” The American Political Science Review 39(2):269292.10.2307/1949186Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791017Google Scholar
Özbay, Cenk. 2015. “Same-Sex Sexualities in Turkey.” International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 20, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 870874.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10219-3Google Scholar
Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi. 2016. “Turkey's Diyanet Under AKP Rule: From Protector to Imposer of State Ideology?Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16(4):619635.10.1080/14683857.2016.1233663Google Scholar
Ozzano, Luca. 2013. “The Many Faces of the Political God: A Typology of Religiously Oriented Parties.” Democratization 20(5):807830.10.1080/13510347.2013.801253Google Scholar
Ozzano, Luca. 2015. “The Debate About Same-Sex Marriages/Civil Unions in Italy's 2006 and 2013 Electoral Campaigns.” Contemporary Italian Politics 7(2):144160.10.1080/23248823.2015.1041250Google Scholar
Ozzano, Luca. 2016. “Two Forms of Catholicism in Twenty-First-Century Italian Public Debate: An Analysis of Positions on Same-Sex Marriage and Muslim Dress Codes.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 21(3):464484.10.1080/1354571X.2016.1169888Google Scholar
Ozzano, Luca, and Giorgi, Alberta. 2016. European Culture Wars and the Italian Case: Which Side Are You On? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pace, Enzo. 2007. “A Peculiar Pluralism.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 12(1):86100.10.1080/13545710601132979Google Scholar
Pastorelli, Sabrina. 2012. “Religious Dress Code: The Italian Case.” In Religion in Public Spaces. A European Perspective, eds Silvio Ferrari and Sabrina Pastorelli. Farnham; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 235254.Google Scholar
Sakallıoğlu, Ümit Cizre. 1996. “Parameters and Strategies of Islam-State Interaction in Republican Turkey.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 28(2):231251.10.1017/S0020743800063157Google Scholar
Scoppola, Pietro. 2006. La democrazia dei Cristiani. Il cattolicesimo politico nell'Italia unita, edit Tognon, G.. Roma-Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Somer, Murat. 2017. “Whither with Secularism or Just Undemocratic Laiklik? The Evolution and Future of Secularism Under the AKP.” In The Uncertain Path of the ‘New Turkey, ed. Talbot, Valeria. Milano: ISPI, Instituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, 2348.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney. 1999. “Secularization, R.I.P.” Sociology of Religion 60(3):249273.10.2307/3711936Google Scholar
Sunier, Thijl, Landman, Nico, Van der Linden, Heleen, Bilgili, Nazlı, and Bilgili, Alper. 2011. The Turkish Directorate for Religious Affairs in a Changing Environment. VU University Amsterdam and Utrecht University. http://www.fsw.vu.nl/nl/Images/Diyanet%20report%202011_tcm30-421402.pdf.Google Scholar
Tepe, Sultan. 2016. “Contesting Political Theologies of Islam and Democracy in Turkey.” Journal of Religious and Political Practice 2(2):175192.10.1080/20566093.2016.1181386Google Scholar
Tuğal, Cihan. 2009. Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804771177Google Scholar
Tütüncü, Fatma. 2010. “The Women Preachers of the Secular State: The Politics of Preaching at the Intersection of Gender, Ethnicity and Sovereignty in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 46(4):595614.10.1080/00263200903189833Google Scholar
Urhan, Betül, and Urhan, Gülcan. 2015. “AKP Döneminde Sosyal Yardım.” In Himmet, Fıtrat, Piyasa. AKP Döneminde Sosyal Politika, eds Koray, Meriem and Çelik, Aziz. Istanbul: İletişim Yayıncılık, 229259.Google Scholar
Verucci, Guido. 1999. La Chiesa Cattolica in Italia dall'unità ad oggi, 1861-1998. Roma/Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Watmough, Simon P., and Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi. 2018. “From ‘Diaspora by Design’ to Transnational Political Exile: The Gülen Movement in Transition.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 19(1):3352.10.1080/21567689.2018.1453254Google Scholar
Wilson, Erin K. 2014. “Theorizing Religion as Politics in Postsecular International Relations.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 15(3):347365.10.1080/21567689.2014.948590Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan. 2000. “Cleansing Islam From the Public Sphere.” Journal of International Affairs 54(1):2142.Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan. 2003. Islamic Political Identity in Turkey. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan, and Balci, Bayram. 2018. Turkey's July 15th Coup: What Happened and Why. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Yavuz, M. Hakan, and Koç, Rasim. 2016. “The Turkish Coup Attempt: The Gülen Movement vs. the State.” Middle East Policy 23(4):136148.10.1111/mepo.12239Google Scholar
Yazıcı, Berna. 2012. “The Return to the Family: Welfare, State, and Politics of the Family in Turkey.” Anthropological Quarterly 85(1):103140.10.1353/anq.2012.0013Google Scholar