Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:55:28.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The False Choice between Universalism and Religion/Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Meghana Nayak*
Affiliation:
Pace University

Extract

I seek to engage the authors in a deeper interrogation of their claims, particularly that societies can mitigate the evolutionary legacy of patriarchy by limiting the influence of religious/cultural enclaves and instead promoting universalism, as exemplified in CEDAW and international law. I challenge and politicize this alleged “choice” between universalism and cultural/religious enclaves/relativism, as it ultimately rests on a series of too-easy dichotomies (secular/religious, western/nonwestern) that may inadvertently stymie collaborative attempts between “western” and “non-western” feminists to challenge inequitable family law and gender violence. Hudson, Bowen, and Nielsen (2011) do offer critiques of western states. They are careful to point out nuances, subtleties, and complexities with their concept of religious/cultural enclaves. They also convincingly broaden the concept of gender equality beyond formal political rights to the kind of social, legal, and economic justice encapsulated in equitable family law and freedom from violence. And, they provoke an examination of why and how gender equality and gender violence are linked. But I suggest that their empirical research might have better traction by taking seriously two problematic implications of championing the “universal” as necessarily progressive: the failure to recognize patriarchy as part of universalism; and the inattention to why and how religious/cultural enclaves are patriarchal.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, Wendy. 2010. “Is Equality Secular?” Forum: Postcolonial and Liberal Discourses of the Family in Secular Polities. Center for Race and Gender, University of California, Berkeley. http://crg.berkeley.edu/content/equality-secular (Accessed April 28, 2012).Google Scholar
Hudson, Valerie M., Bowen, Donna Lee, and Nielson, Perpetua Lynne. 2011. “What Is the Relationship between Inequality in Family Law and Violence against Women? Approaching the Issue in Legal Enclaves.” Politics & Gender 7 (4): 453–92.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Weldon, Laurel. 2011. “Sex Equality in Family Law: Historical Legacies, Feminist Activism, and Religious Power in 70 Countries.” World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development Background Paper. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1322671773271/Htun-Weldon-family-law-paper-april-11.pdf (Accessed April 29, 2012).Google Scholar
Sunder, Madhavi. 2003. “Piercing the Veil.” Yale Law Journal 112 (6): 1399–472.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar