Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:06:54.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Women Run Against Women: The Hidden Influence of Female Incumbents in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1956–2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2005

Barbara Palmer  and
Dennis M. Simon
Barbara Palmer
Affiliation:
American University
Dennis M. Simon
Affiliation:
Southern Methodist University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although it is well known that “when women run, they win as often as men,” the literature on women and campaigns suggests that we should see significant differences in races involving male and female incumbents. Do female incumbents face the same competitive environment as their male counterparts in elections for the U.S. House of Representatives? Using the existing literature on the role of stereotypes and gender traits in campaigns, we formulate two hypotheses to explain the relationship between gender and incumbency. The Competition Hypothesis asserts that compared to male incumbents, women running for reelection will face more competition in retaining their seats. The Gender Effect Hypothesis predicts that female incumbents will induce other women to enter the race. On the basis of an analysis of House elections from 1956 to 2002, we find considerable support for both hypotheses. In House elections, female incumbents have a “hidden influence”: Not only do they face more competition but they also increase the participation of female candidates in their own party as well as the opposition party. Although female incumbents win at the same rates as male incumbents, they face a much more competitive environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2005 , pp. 39 - 63
Copyright
© 2005 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Deborah, and Kristi Andersen. 1993. “Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
America Votes. 1956–2002. Washington, DC: Elections Research Center, Congressional Quarterly.
Andersen, Kristi, and Stuart Thorson. 1984. “Congressional Turnover and the Election of Women.” Western Political Quarterly 37 (1): 143–56.Google Scholar
Ardoin, Phillip J., and James C. Garand. 2003. “Measuring Constituency Ideology in U.S. House Districts: A Top-Down Simulation.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1165–89.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Gary King, and Langche Zeng. 2000. “Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture.” American Political Science Review 94 (1): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Gary King, and Langche Zeng. 2004. “Theory and Evidence in International Conflict: A Response to de Marchi, Gelpi, and Grynaviski.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 379–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiler, David. 1990. “How To Defeat Women and Blacks.” Campaigns and Elections. August–September [online version obtained from Lexis-Nexis].Google Scholar
Berch, Neil. 1996. “The ‘Year of the Woman’ in Context: A Test of Six Explanations.” American Politics Quarterly 24 (2): 169–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Robert. 1997. “Might Women Have the Edge in Open-Seat House Primaries?” Women and Politics 17 (2): 1–26.Google Scholar
Braden, Maria. 1996. Women Politicians and the Media. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
Brown, Clyde, Neil Heighberger, and Peter Shocket. 1993. “Gender-Based Differences in Perceptions of Male and Female City Council Candidates.” Women and Politics 13 (1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1988. “The Political Opportunity of Women Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives in 1984.” Women and Politics 8 (1): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1992. “Women Candidates in Open-Seat Primaries for the U.S. House: 1968–1990.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Carroll, Susan. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Chaney, Carole. 1998. “Running Against a Woman: Advertising Strategies in Mixed-Sex Races for the United States Senate and Their Impact on Candidate Evaluation.” Presented at the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Los Angeles.
Chaney, Carole, and Barbara Sinclair. 1994. “Women and the 1992 House Elections.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Reality, ed. Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Clift, Eleanor, and Tom Brazaitis. 2000. Madam President: Shattering the Final Glass Ceiling. New York: Scribner.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell. 1998. “Voter Reactions to Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, and Clyde Wilcox. 1995. “Women Voters in the Year of the Woman.” In Democracy's Feast: Elections in America, ed. Herbert Weisberg. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Cooperman, Rosalyn, and Bruce Oppenheimer. 2001. “The Gender Gap in the House of Representatives.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th Edition, ed. Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Darcy, R., and James Choike. 1986. “A Formal Analysis of Legislative Turnover: Women Candidates and Legislative Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (1): 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, R., and Sarah Slavin Schramm. 1977. “When Women Run Against Men.” Public Opinion Quarterly 41: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, R., Susan Welch, and Janet Clark. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation. 2d ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Deber, Raisa. 1982. “The Fault Dear Brutus: Women as Congressional Candidates in Pennsylvania.” Journal of Politics 44 (2): 463–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Ester Fuchs. 1993. “The Year of the Woman? Candidates, Voters, and the 1992 Elections.” Political Science Quarterly 108 (1): 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathy. 1998. “Voting for Women in the ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathy. 2001. “Electoral Context, Issues, and Voting for Women in the 1990s.” In Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling, ed. Karen O'Connor. New York: Haworth Press.
Dolan, Kathy 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 1998. “The Bottleneck: Women Becoming Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fenno, Richard. 1977. “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration.” American Political Science Review 71 (3): 883–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard. 1997. Gender Dynamics in Congressional Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Fox, Richard, Jennifer Lawless, and Courtney Feeley. 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 411–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard, and Zoe Oxley. 2003. “Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidates Selection and Success.” Journal of Politics 65 (3): 833–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francia, Peter. 2001. “Early Fundraising by Nonincumbent Female Congressional Candidates: The Importance of Women's PACs.” In Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling, ed. Karen O'Connor. New York: Haworth Press.
Gaddie, Ronald Keith, and Charles Bullock. 1995. “Congressional Elections and the Year of the Woman: Structural and Elite Influences on Female Candidates.” Social Science Quarterly 76 (4): 749–62.Google Scholar
Gallup Poll. 1992. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
Gertzog, Irwin, and Michele Simard. 1991. “Women and ‘Hopeless’ Congressional Candidacies: Nomination Frequency, 1916–1978.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (4): 449–66.Google Scholar
Green, Joanne Connor. 1998. “The Role of Gender in Open-Seat Elections for the U.S. House of Representative: A District Level Test for a Differential Value for Campaign Resources.” Women and Politics 19 (2): 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Susan. 1997. “Talking About Politics: Gender and Contextual Effects on Political Proselytizing.” Journal of Politics 59 (1): 73–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, Rebekah. 1995. “A Reappraisal of the Quality of Women Candidates.” Women and Politics 15 (4): 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrick, Rebekah. 1996. “Is There a Gender Gap in the Value of Campaign Resources?” American Politics Quarterly 24 (1): 68–80.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S. 1998. Congressional Elections: Campaigning At Home and in Washington. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Herrnson, Paul, Celeste Lay, and Atiya Kai Stokes. 2003. “Women Running ‘as Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” Journal of Politics 65 (1): 244–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Kim, Carrie Palmer, and Ronald Keith Gaddie. 2001. “Candidate Sex and Congressional Elections: Open Seats Before, During, and After the Year of the Woman.” In Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling, ed. Karen O”Connor. New York: Haworth Press.
Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993a. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Nayda Terkildsen. 1993b. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Nicholas Valentino, Stephen Ansolabehere, and Adam Simon. 1997. “Running as a Woman: Gender Stereotyping in Political Campaigns.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Pippa Norris. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jacobson, Gary C. 1997. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 4th ed. New York: Harper Collins.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1995. “Characteristics of Press Coverage in Senate and Gubernatorial Elections: Information Available to Voters.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (1): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Edie Goldenberg. 1991. “Women Candidates in the News: An Examination of Gender Differences in U.S. Senate Campaign Coverage.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55 (2): 180–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Karen, and John Petrocik. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 864–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 2000. “Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?” Journal of Politics 62 (2): 414–29.Google Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Citizens' Impression of House Candidates' Ideological Orientations.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropf, Martha, and John Boiney. 2001. “The Electoral Glass Ceiling? Gender, Viability, and the News in U.S. Senate Campaigns.” In Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling, ed. Karen O'Connor. New York: Haworth Press.
Lamson, Peggy. 1968. Few Are Chosen. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Leeper, Mark. 1991. “The Impact of Prejudice on Female Candidates: An Experimental Look at Voter Inference.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (2): 248–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’ ” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary U.S. Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika. 1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, David. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women and Politics 19 (2): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, David, and Jeremy Zilber. 2001. “‘How Does She Have Time for Kids and Congress?’ Views on Gender and Media Coverage from House Offices.” In Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling, ed. Karen O'Connor. New York: Haworth Press.
Norris, Pippa. 1997. “Women Leaders Worldwide: A Splash of Color in the Photo Op.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Pippa Norris. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ornstein, Norman J., Thomas E. Mann, and Michael J. Malbin, eds. 1998. Vital Statistics on Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Palmer, Barbara, and Dennis Simon. 2001. “The Political Glass Ceiling: Gender, Strategy, and Incumbency in U.S. House Elections, 1978–1998.” In Women and Congress: Running, Winning and Ruling, ed. Karen O'Connor. New York: Haworth Press.
Palmer, Barbara, and Dennis Simon. 2003. “Political Ambition and Women in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1916–2000.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 127–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rodine, Sharon. 1990. “How to Beat ‘Bubba,’” Campaigns and Elections. October-November [online version obtained from Lexis-Nexis].Google Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1981. “Why Women Don't Run: The Critical and Contextual Factors in Women's Legislative Recruitment.” Western Political Quarterly 34: 60–77.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002a. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002b. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791–809.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Pat. 1999. Twenty-four Years of House Work and the Place is Still a Mess. Kansas City, MO: Andrews McMeel.
Seligman, Lester. 1961. “Political Recruitment and Party Structure: A Case Study.” American Political Science Review 5 (1): 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltzer, Richard, Jody Newman, and Melissa Voorhees Leighton. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Shapiro, Robert, and Harpreet Mahajan. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Dennis, and Barbara Palmer. 2005. The Political Geography of Women-Friendly Districts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
Theilmann, John, and Al Wilhite. 1991. Discrimination and Congressional Campaign Contributions. New York: Praeger.
Thompson, Seth, and Janie Steckenrider. 1997. “The Relative Irrelevance of Candidate Sex.” Women and Politics 17 (4): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Gary King, and Langche Zeng. 1999. “RELOGIT: Rare Events Logistical Regression.” Version 1.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Uhlaner, Carole Jean, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1986. “Candidate Gender and Congressional Campaign Receipts.” Journal of Politics 48 (1): 30–50.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, Margery Ambrosius, Janet Clark, and R. Darcy. 1985. “The Effect of Candidate Gender on Election Outcomes in State Legislative Races.” Western Political Quarterly 38 (3): 464–75.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Donley Studlar. 1996. “The Opportunity Structure for Women's Candidacies and Electability in Britain and the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 49 (4): 861–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde. 1994. “Why Was 1992 the ‘Year of the Woman’? Explaining Women's Gains in 1992.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Reality, ed. Elizabeth Adell Cook, Sue Thomas, and Clyde Wilcox. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Williams, Leonard. 1998. “Gender, Political Advertising, and the ‘Air Wars.’” Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Witt, Linda, Karen Paget, and Glenna Matthews. 1995. Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: Free Press.