Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T06:28:16.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shipping nuclear cargo via the Northern Sea Route

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Steven G. Sawhill  and
Claes Lykke Ragner
Steven G. Sawhill
Affiliation:
The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Box 326, N-1326 Lysaker, Norway
Claes Lykke Ragner
Affiliation:
The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Box 326, N-1326 Lysaker, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The commercial nuclear industry is considering the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative transit route for shipments of radioactive material between Europe and Japan, and as an import$sol;export route for shipments into and out of Russia. Technologically, the NSR is a practicable route, and factors that currently make it uneconomical for most commercial cargoes do not generally apply to nuclear ones. A shorter route between Europe and Japan may reduce operating costs and could enhance the safety and security of nuclearmaterial. Shippers are also attracted by the prospect of reducing political opposition along current routes. These advantages are offset by the cost of building specialised ships, uncertainties associated with Russia and its icebreaker fleet, and uncertainties regarding the risk and effects of a severe transport accident involving radioactive material. The likelihood of using the NSR for nuclear transport remains uncertain. Transit use is unlikely without a basis for long-term transport between Europe and east Asia. Russia's plans to expand its nuclear services industry are not dependent on using the NSR: the Arctic alternative via the port of Dudinka is only one of several suggested routes. Whether it is selected will depend upon whom Russia gains as customers and whether it provides the most convenient, cost-efficient option.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 38 , Issue 204 , January 2002 , pp. 39 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme. 1998. AMAP assessment report: Arctic pollution issues. Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.Google Scholar
Armada de Chile. 1998. Noticiario [Notices]. Revista de Marina 115 (5): 507.Google Scholar
Armstrong, T.E. 1952. The Northern Sea Route: Soviet exploitation of the North East Passage.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baba, S., Carter, G.J. and Tissot-Colle, C.. 1998 The return of vitrified residues to Japan: a joint experience. Unpublished paper presented at the 12th International Conference on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials, Paris, 13–15 05 1998. Warrington: British Nuclear Fuels.Google Scholar
Barr, W. 1991. The Arctic Ocean in Russian history to 1945. In: Brigham, L.W. (editor).The Soviet maritime Arctic. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press: 11–32.Google Scholar
Birnie, P.W., and Boyle, A.E.. 1994. International law and the environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bjurström, S. 2000. Transport of radioactive materials: a strong and a weak link in the nuclear fuel cycle. In:Proceedings of the Uranium Institute 25th annual symposium, London, 31 August-1 September 2000. London: Uranium Institute.Google Scholar
Brigham, L.W. 1998. The Northern Sea Route, 1997. PolariRecord 34 (190): 219–224.Google Scholar
Brigham, L.W. 2000. The Northern Sea Route, 1998. Polar Record 36 (196): 19–24.Google Scholar
Brigham, L.W., Grishchenko, V.D., and Kamesaki, K.. 1999. The natural environment, ice navigation and ship technology. In: Østreng, W. (editor). The natural and societal challenges of the Northern Sea Route: a reference work.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 47–120.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R.D. and Østreng, W.. 1999. The Northern SeaRoute regime:exquisite superpower subterfuge? Ocean Development and International Law40: 299–331.Google Scholar
Currie, D.E.J., and Dyke, J.M. Van. 1999. The shipment of ultrahazardous nuclear materials in international law. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 8 (2): 113–124.Google Scholar
Evai, A.V. 2000. The Northern Sea Route and its impact on the indigenous peoples of the Russian north. In: Ragner, C.L. (editor). The 21st century— turning point for the Northern Sea Route? Proceedings from the Northern Sea Route user conference, Oslo, 18–20 November 1999. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 271–273.Google Scholar
Galdorisi, G. 1996. The United States freedom of navigation program: a bridge for international compliance with the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea? Ocean Development & International Law 27: 399–408.Google Scholar
Glasser, S.B. 2001. Russians see a worrisome windfall in processing nuclear waste. International Herald Tribune 13 February 2001: 4.Google Scholar
Holland, C.A. 1994. Arctic exploration and development c. 500 b.c. to 1915: an encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Hydrographer of the Navy. 1997. The Antarctic pilot. Fifth edition. Taunton: Hydrographer of the Navy.Google Scholar
IAEA. 1996. Regulations for the safe transport of radioactive material. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (Safety standard series no. ST-1).Google Scholar
IAEA. 1997. Joint convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (INFCIRC/546).Google Scholar
IAEA. 1999. The physical protection of nuclear material and nuclear facilities. Vienna:' International Atomic Energy Agency (INFCIRC/225/Rev.4 (corrected)).Google Scholar
IAEA. 2000a. Communication from certain member states concerning their policies regarding the management of Plutonium. Vienna:'International Atomic Energy Agency (INFCIRC/549/Add.1/3).Google Scholar
IAEA. 2000b. Measures to strengthen international cooperation in nuclear, radiation and waste safety: safety of transport of radioactive materials. Vienna:International Atomic Energy Agency (GOV/INF/2000/16-GC(44)/INF/7).Google Scholar
IMO. 1998. Code for the safe carriage of irradiated nuclear fuel, plutonium and high-level radioactive wastes on board ships (INF code). London:'International Maritime Organization (IMO-270E).Google Scholar
Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics. 2000. Shipping statistics yearbook. Bremen:'Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics.Google Scholar
Jagland, T. 2001. Transport av atomavfall langs kysten. [Transport of nuclear waste along the coast]. Nordlys (Tromsø), 3 February.Google Scholar
Kamesaki, K., Kishi, S., and Yamauchi, Y.. 1999. Simulation of NSR shipping based on year–round and seasonal operation scenarios. Lysaker:'Fridtjof Nansen Institute (INSROP Working Paper 164).Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, B., and Soons, A.. 1994. Plutonium shipments – a supplement. Ocean Development & International Law 25: 419–429.Google Scholar
Lindeman, E. 1998. Public and media acceptance of nuclear materials transport. In: Proceedings of the Uranium Institute 23rd annual symposium, London, 10–11 10 1998. London:'Uranium Institute.Google Scholar
Lloyd's Register. 2000. Register of ships. London:'Lloyd's Register of Shipping.Google Scholar
Miller, M.L. 1998. An overview of design and operation of an irradiated nuclear fuel transport ship. International Journal of Radioactive Materials Transports. 157–164.Google Scholar
Moe, K.A., and Semanov, G.S.. 1999. Environmental assessments. In: W, Østreng. (editor). The natural and societal challengesof the Northern Sea Route: a reference work. Dordrecht:'Kluwer Academic Publishers: 121–220.Google Scholar
Nilsen, T., and Kudrik, I.. 2000. Minatom's strategy for spent fuel imports outlined. Nuclear Chronicle from Russia 13 March 2000.Google Scholar
Osherenko, G., Schindler, D.L., Pika, A.I., and Bogoyavlensky, D.. 1997. The Northern Sea Route and native peoples: lessons from the 20th century for the 21st.Lysaker:'Fridtjof Nansen Institute (INSROP Working Paper 93).Google Scholar
Østreng, W. 1999a. The historical and geopolitical context of the Northern Sea Route. In: W, Østreng. (editor). The natural and societal challenges of the Northern Sea Route: a reference work. Dordrecht:'Kluwer Academic Publishers: 1–46.Google Scholar
Østreng, W. 1999b. The multiple realities of the Northern Sea Route:geographical hot and cool spots of navigation. In:W, Østreng. (editor).The natural and societal challenges of the Northern Sea Route: a reference work. Dordrecht:'Kluwer Academic Publishers: 365–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østreng, W., Kolodkin, A.L., Brubaker, R.D., and Jernsletten, J.L.. 1999. Military, political, legal and human affairs. In: W, Østreng. (editor). The natural and societal challenges of the Northern Sea Route: a reference work. Dordrecht:'Kluwer Academic Publishers: 281–363.Google Scholar
Paine, C.E. 1996. The explosive properties of reactorgrade plutonium. In: Harrison, S.S. (editor). Japan's nuclear future: the plutonium debate and east Asian security. Washington, DC:'Carnegie Endowment: 111–116.Google Scholar
Paine, C.E. 2000. Military uses of ocean space and the law of the sea in the new millennium. Ocean Development & International Law 31: 7–45.Google Scholar
Ragner, C.L. 2000. The Northern Sea Route: commercial potential, economic significance, and infrastructure requirements. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 41: 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsland, T.R., and Hedels, S.. 1996. The NSR transit study (Part IV): the economics of the NSR: a feasibility study of the Northern Sea Route as an alternative to the international shipping market. Lysaker:'Fridtjof Nansen Institute (INSROP Working Paper 59).Google Scholar
Robberson, T. 1999. Safe passage? The Dallas Morning News 4 July 1999.Google Scholar
Rozenberg, J.I. 2000. Norilsk nickel and the Northern Sea Route. In: Ragner, C.L. (editor). The 21st century — turning point for the Northern Sea Route? Proceedings from the Northern Sea Route user conference, Oslo, 18–20 November 1999. Dordrecht:'Kluwer Academic Publishers: 291–292.Google Scholar
Stortinget, . 2001a. Skriftelig sporsmal fra representanten Petter Løvik til utenriksministeren, besvart av utenriksminister Thorbjørn Jagland. [Written question from Representative Petter Løvik to the foreign minister, answered by Foreign Minister Thorbjørn Jagland].Stortingsforhandlingene dok.15, spm.228 (13–20 February 2001).Google Scholar
Stortinget, . 2001b. Spørsmal nr. 1 fra representanten Inger Stolt-Nielsen til statsministeren, besvart av miljøvernminister Siri Bjerke. [Question no. 1 from Representative IngerStolt-Nielsen to the prime minister, answered by Environment Minister Siri Bjerke].Spørretime, no.10 (31 January 2001).Google Scholar
Tamvakis, M., Granberg, A., and Gold, E.. 1999. Economy and commercial viability. In: W, Østreng. (editor). The natural and societal challenges of the Northern Sea Route: a reference work. Dordrecht:'Kluwer Academic Publishers: 221–280.Google Scholar
Thomassen, J., Moe, K.A. and Brude, O.W.. 1999. INSROP environmental impact statement. Lysaker:'Fridtjof Nansen Institute (INSROP Working Paper 163).Google Scholar
Tsumune, D., Saegusa, T., Suzuki, H., Watabe, N., Asano, H., Maruyama, K., and Kinehara, Y.. 2000. Dose assessment for the public due to packages shipping radioactive materials hypothetically sunk on a continental shelf. International Journal of Radioactive Materials Transport 11: 317–328.Google Scholar
United Nations Treaty Series. 1987. Convention on the physical protection of nuclear material, with annexes, 3 March 1980. Treaties and international agreements registered or filed or reported with the Secretariat of the United Nations, volume 1456, no.24631.Google Scholar
United Nations Treaty Series. 1990. Japan and United States of America: agreement for cooperation concerning peaceful uses of nuclear energy, with annexes, agreed minutes and implementing agreement, 4 Novemeber 1987. Treaties and international agreements registered orfiled or reported with the Secretariat of the United Nations, volume 1574, no. 27500.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J.M. 1993. Sea shipment of Japanese plutonium under international law. Ocean Development & International Law 24: 399–430.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, J.M. 1996. Applying the precautionary principle to ocean shipments of radioactive materials. Ocean Development & International Law 27: 379–397.Google Scholar
Wonham, J., Davies, C.M, Asimakopoulos, V.G., and Tselentis, B.S.. 2000. Marine transportation of irradiated nuclear fuel, plutonium and radioactive wastes: the continuing debate on regulatory measures. Marine Policy 24 (4): 287–299.Google Scholar
World Nuclear Association. 2001. Japanese waste and MOX shipments from Europe. London:'World Nuclear Association.Google Scholar
Yakovlev, A., Semanov, G., Ivanov, Y., Ushakov, A., Zubarev, S., Gavrilo, M., Khlebovich, V., Moe, K.A., Thomassen, J., and Brude, O.W.. 1999. Legal and environmental evaluation of the routes selected for the INSROP simulation study. Lysaker:'Fridtjof Nansen Institute (INSROP Working Paper 128).Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K., Kitamura, T., Shibata, K., Ouchi, Y., Ito, T., McClure, J.D., Pierce, J.D., Hohnstreiter, G.F., and Smith, J.D.. 2000. Study of the accident environment during sea transport of nuclear material: probabilistic safety analysis of plutonium transport from Europe to Japan. International Journal of Radioactive Materials Transport 11: 217–238.Google Scholar