No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy (1992). Current morphology. (Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge. Pp. xiii + 289.
Review products
Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy (1992). Current morphology. (Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge. Pp. xiii + 289.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992
References
REFERENCES
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. A. & Rosenbaum, P. (eds.) Readings in English transformational grammar. Boston: Ginn. 184–221.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. & Gilligan, G. (1985). The suffixing preference: a processing explanation. Linguistics 23. 723–758.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.-M. & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1982). Formal problems in Semitic morphology and phonology. PhD thesis (1979), MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plural. NLLT 8. 209–284.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Siegel, M. (1978). A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. LI 9. 199–260.Google Scholar
Ward, G., Sproat, R. & McKoon, G. (1991). A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Lg 67. 439–474.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1981). On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. LI 12. 245–274.Google Scholar