Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T07:25:46.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carole Paradis and Jean-François Prunet (eds.) (1991). The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence. (Phonetics and Phonology 2). San Diego: Academic Press. Pp. xvii + 231.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

John McCarthy  and
Alison Taub
John McCarthy
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Alison Taub
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Phonology , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , August 1992 , pp. 363 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology 5. 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1976). Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Avery, P. & Rice, K. (1989). Segment structure and coronal underspecification. Phonology 6. 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowsky, T. (1986). Topics in the lexical phonology of English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Borowsky, T. (1987). Antigemination in English phonology. LI 18. 671–678.Google Scholar
Broselow, E. (1985). Amharic, automatic spreading, and the obligatory contour principle. Ms, State University of New York, Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1976). Palatalization: linking or assimilation? CLS 12. 96–109.Google Scholar
Denes, P. (1963). On the statistics of spoken English. JASA 35. 892–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E. (1969). Syllables. JL 5. 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (1980). Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1. 83–105.Google Scholar
Hoberman, R. (1985). The phonology of pharyngeals and pharyngealization in pre-modern Aramaic. Journal of the American Oriental Society 105. 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of Lexical Phonology. Phonology Yearbook 2. 85–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamontagne, G. (1992). A revised theory of English phonotactics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Levin, J. (1988). A place for lateral in the feature geometry. Ms, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1988). Feature geometry and dependency: a review. Phonetica 43. 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mester, R. A. (1986). Studies in tier structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Mester, R. A. & Itô, J. (1989). Feature predictability and underspecification: palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Lg 65. 258–293.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. (1991). On the bases of radical underspecification. NLLT 9. 285–325.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. (1991). Stricture in feature geometry. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. & Prunet, J.-F. (1989a). On coronal transparency. Phonology 6. 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. & Prunet, J.-F. (1989b). Markedness and coronal structure. NELS 19. 330–344.Google Scholar
Sagey, E. (1986). The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1986). A note on coronal. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Steriade, D. (1987). Redundant values. CLS 23:2. 339–362.Google Scholar
Wang, W. & Crawford, J. (1960). Frequency studies of English consonants. Language and Speech 3. 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, M. (1988). The Obligatory Contour Principle and phonological rules: a loss of identity. LI 19. 65–100.Google Scholar