Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:32:21.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Procedures, Products and Pictures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Rom Harré  and
Jean-Pierre Llored
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In several recent publications in the philosophy of chemistry we have made use of a repertoire of analytical concepts to guide our investigations. Perhaps studies of other sophisticated knowledge garnering practices could benefit from adopting this analytical scheme if we want to understand their merits and drawbacks. Our suggestions for shaping methodologies for philosophical studies in particular fields of interest includes both the natural sciences, legal systems in action, economies and their management, warfare, preparing the dishes of a cuisine, and so on. Adopting our proposals would encourage philosophers to examine our world seen as fields of material and cultural/social entities affording opportunities for action. At a certain level of analysis, the products of such action, appear to be perfectly identical entities, fungibles. There are no fungibles in nature. They must therefore be thought of as constituents of iconic models. Our scheme for critically examining the practices of investigators is meant to ensure the intelligibility both of the relevant discourse and the trustworthiness of the practices of the discipline in question. The Third Wittgenstein's ‘hinges’ that function as necessities and yet are vulnerable to empirical assessment provide a generic frame for analyses of human practices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 93 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 167 - 186
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Harré, R. & Llored, J.-P., ‘Mereologies as the Grammars of Chemical Discourses’, Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1), 2011, 63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harré, R. & Llored, J.-P., ‘Mereologies and Molecules’, Foundations of Chemistry 15 (2), 2013, 127–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Grimm, Stephen R., ‘Why Study History? On Its Epistemic Benefits and Its Relation to the Sciences’, Philosophy 92 (2017), 406–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Wittgenstein, L., On Certainty (Oxford: Blackwell, 1979)Google Scholar.

4 Moyal-Sharrock, D., (ed.) The Third Wittgenstein (London: Routledge, 2004)Google Scholar.

5 We take this example from a report in The Times, 28th August 2017, ‘Ancient remedies lie hidden behind monastery scriptures’.

6 Gibson, J. J., An Ecological Theory of Perception (Boston: Houghton Miflin, 1979)Google Scholar.

7 Gooding, D., Experiment and the Making of Meaning (London: Kluwer Academy, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Earley, J., ‘Why there is no salt in the sea’, Foundations of Chemistry 7 (2005), 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Llored, J.-P., ‘Investigating the meaning of the ceteris paribus clause in chemistry’ in Scerri, E. & McIntyre, L. (eds), Philosophy of Chemistry: Synthesis of a New Discipline, 2nd Edition, (Dordrecht: Springer, 2015), 219–233Google Scholar.

10 Ibid.

11 Llored, J.-P., ‘Investigating Consistencies, Inconsistencies, and the Meaning of the Ceteris Paribus Clause in Chemistry’, Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 32, (2017), 53–74Google Scholar.

12 Brillat-Savarin, J. A., The Physiology of Taste, trans. Fisher, M. K., (Everyman's Library, 2009)Google Scholar.

13 Cartwright, N., Nature's Capacities and their Measurement (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

14 Popper, K.R., A World of Propensities (London: Theommes Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

15 Klein, U. & Lefèvre, W., Materials in Eighteenth-century Science: A Historical Ontology (London: The MIT Press, 2007)Google Scholar.

16 Mumford, S., Dispositions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

17 Armstrong, D. M., A World of States of Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Chang, H., Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism (New York: Springer, 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Bennet, M. R. & Hacker, P. M. S., Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003)Google Scholar.

20 Michael Lockwood developed this parallel in an unpublished lecture series at Oxford in 1996.

21 Llored, J.-P., ‘Wholes and Parts in Quantum Chemistry: Some Mereological and Philosophical Consequences’, HYLE International Journal for the Philosophy of Chemistry 20 (2014), 141–163Google Scholar.

22 Llored, J.-P. & Harré, R., ‘Developing the Mereology of Chemistry’ in Calosi, C. & Graziani, P. (eds), Mereology and The Sciences (New York: Springer, 2014), 260–284Google Scholar.

23 Ibid.

24 Hempel, C. G., Aspects of Scientific Explanation (New York, Free Press, 1965)Google Scholar.

25 Hesse, M. B., Models and Analogies in Science (London, Sheed and Ward, 1959)Google Scholar.

26 For brevity, we will not enter into technical details here, the readers could find such developments in (op. cit. note 21).

27 Popelier, P., Atoms in Molecules. An Introduction (London: Prentice Hall, 2000)Google Scholar.

28 Ibid.