Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:05:52.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whole and Part in Cosmological, Arguments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

R. G. Swinburne
R. G. Swinburne
Affiliation:
University of Hull.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 44 , Issue 170 , October 1969 , pp. 339 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Leibniz, G. W.On the Ultimate Origination of Things.Google Scholar

2 Hume, DavidDialogues concerning Natural Religion (ed.) Aiken, H. D., New York, 1948, pp. 59fGoogle Scholar. The same argument is put forward, among modern writers, by Paul Edwards. He writes that “if we have explained the individual members” of a series “there is nothing additional left to be explained”. (“The Cosmological Argument” in The Rationalist Annual 1959, pp. 63–77. See p. 71).Google Scholar