Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:09:12.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Biology a Provincial Science?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2022

Ronald Munson
Ronald Munson*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri–St. Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

My thesis is that biology is most plausibly regarded as a universal, as distinct from a provincial, science. First, I develop the general notion of a provincial science, formulate three criteria for applying the concept, and present brief examples illustrating their use. Second, I argue that a consideration of population genetics as a characteristic example of a basic biological theory strengthens the prior presumption that biology is not a provincial science. Finally, I examine two arguments to the effect that biology is a provincial science. The first concerns biology's exclusively terrestrial evidence base, the second the logical character of its laws. I introduce considerations that weaken the persuasiveness of the first argument and then show that the second one rests upon a false premise and so should be rejected.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1975 , pp. 428 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I gratefully acknowledge the help and suggestions of David Conway, David Hull, Ernest Mayr, Kenneth Schaffner, and James Walters.

References

Achinstein, P. Concepts of Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Bock, W. J. and von Wahlert, G. “Two Evolutionary Theories: A Discussion.” In Man and Nature. Edited by Munson, R. New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1971. Pages 167–176.Google Scholar
Chiera, E. They Wrote on Clay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. The Birth of a New Physics. New York: Doubleday, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, J. B. “Robert Boyle's Experiments in Pneumatics.” In Harvard Case Histories in Experimental Science. Vol. 1. Edited by Conant, J. B. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957. Pages 1–65.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. “Explanation, Reduction, and Empricism.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 3. Edited by Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1962. Pages 29–97.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. (2nd ed.). New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar
Handler, P. (ed.). Biology and the Future of Man. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. Philosophy of Natural Science. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. The Copernican Revolution. New York: Random House, 1957.Google Scholar
Lederberg, J. “Exobiology: Approaches to Life Beyond the Earth.” Science 132 (1960): 393–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mettler, L. and Gregg, T. G. Population Genetics and Evolution. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar
Morgenbesser, S. “Is it a Science?” Social Research. (July, 1966): 255–271.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. “Are there Laws in Biology?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (1970): 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. The Philosophy of Biology. London: Hutchinson, 1973.Google Scholar
Sagan, C. “On the Origin and Planetary Distribution of Life.” Radiation Research 15 (1961): 174–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shklovski, I. S. and Sagan, C. Intelligent Life in the Universe. New York: Dell Publishing Co., 1966. (The contribution of each author is typographically indicated.)Google Scholar
Simon, M. The Matter of Life. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. Between Science and Philosophy. New York: Random House, 1968.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther S. Molecular Genetics. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Thomsen, D. E. “Toward a Universal Biology: The Search for Life on Mars.” Science News 100 (1971): 64–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S. Philosophy of Science. London: Hutchinson and Co., 1953.Google Scholar