Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:07:12.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Third-Wave Feminism and the Defense of “Choice”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

R. Claire Snyder-Hall
R. Claire Snyder-Hall
Affiliation:
George Mason University. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How should feminist theorists respond when women who claim to be feminists make “choices” that seemingly prop up patriarchy, like posing for Playboy, eroticizing male dominance, or advocating wifely submission? This article argues that the conflict between the quest for gender equality and the desire for sexual pleasure has long been a challenge for feminism. In fact, the second-wave of the American feminist movement split over issues related to sexuality. Feminists found themselves on opposite sides of a series of contentious debates about issues such as pornography, sex work, and heterosexuality, with one side seeing evidence of gender oppression and the other opportunities for sexual pleasure and empowerment. Since the mid-1990s, however, a third wave of feminism has developed that seeks to reunite the ideals of gender equality and sexual freedom. Inclusive, pluralistic, and non-judgmental, third-wave feminism respects the right of women to decide for themselves how to negotiate the often contradictory desires for both gender equality and sexual pleasure. While this approach is sometimes caricatured as uncritically endorsing whatever a woman chooses to do as feminist, this essay argues that third-wave feminism actually exhibits not a thoughtless endorsement of “choice,” but rather a deep respect for pluralism and self-determination.

Type
Symposium
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 255 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, Dorothy. 1989. Public Silence, Private Terror. In Pleasure and Danger: exploring female sexuality, ed. Vance, Carole S.. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
Baumgardner, Jennifer, and Richards, Amy. 2000. Manifesta: Young Women, Feminism, and the Future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Bell, Laurie, ed. 1987. Good Girls/Bad Girls: Feminists and Sex Trade Workers Face to Face. Toronto: The Seal Press.Google Scholar
Boston Women's Health Book Collective. 1973. Our Bodies, Ourselves. Boston: New England Free Press.Google Scholar
Darraj, Susan Muaddi. 2002. It's Not an Oxymoron: The Search for an Arab Feminism. In Colonize This! Young Women of Color on Today's Feminism, ed. Hernández and Rehman. New York: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Doyle, Laura. 2001. The Surrendered Wife: A Practical Guide to Finding Intimacy, Passion, and Peace with a Man. New York: Fireside.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1981 [1979]. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 2006 [1987]. Intercourse. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Echols, Alice. 1989. Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967–1975. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Sara. 2003. Tidal Wave: How Women Changed America at Century's End. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Michaele L. 2010. Choice Feminism and the Fear of Politics. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretté, Julliette. 2008. The Write Stuff. Playboy 55 (6): 84–85, 128.Google Scholar
Friedan, Betty. 1983 [1963]. The Feminine Mystique. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Grant, Judith. 1993. Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hartley, Nina. 1997. In the Flesh: A Porn Star's Journey. In Whores and Other Feminists, ed. Nagle, Joan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hernández, Daisy, and Rehman, Bushra, eds. 2002. Colonize This! Young Women of Color on Today's Feminism. New York: Seal Press.Google Scholar
Heywood, Leslie L., ed. 2006. The Women's Movement Today: An Encyclopedia of Third Wave Feminism, Volume 1: A–Z. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Highleyman, Liz. 1997. Professional Dominance: Power, Money, and Identity. In Whores and Other Feminists, ed. Nagle, Joan. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirshman, Linda. 2006. Get To Work: A Manifesto for Women of the World. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Koedt, Anne 1970. “The Myth of the Vaginal Orgasm.” Available at http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/modern/The-Myth-ofthe-Vaginal-Orgasm.html.Google Scholar
Leeds Revolutionary Feminists. 1981. Love Your Enemy? The Debate between Heterosexual Feminism and Political Lesbianism. London: Onlywomen Press, Ltd.Google Scholar
Levy, Arial. 2005. Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Linden, Robin Ruth, Pagano, Darlene R., Russell, Diana E. H., and Star, Susan Leigh, eds. 1982. Against Sadomasochism: A Radical Feminist Analysis. San Francisco: Frog in the Well.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Desire and Power (1983). In Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marso, Lori Jo. 2006. Feminist Thinkers and the Demands of Femininity: The Lives and Work of Intellectual Women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marso, Lori J. 2010. Feminism's Quest for Common Desires. Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 263–69.Google Scholar
Morgan, Joan. 2006. Hip-Hop Feminist. In The Women's Movement Today: An Encyclopedia of Third Wave Feminism, Volume 2: Primary Documents, ed. Heywood, Leslie L.. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Nestle, Joan. 1987. A Restricted Country. New York: Firebrand Books.Google Scholar
Nestle, Joan. 1989. The Fem Question. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring female sexuality, ed. Vance, Carole S.. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
Rosen, Ruth. 2000. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women's Movement Changed America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
SAMOIS: A lesbian/feminist S/M organization. 1982 [1981]. Coming To Power. Boston: Alyson Publications.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. Claire. 2008. Third Wave Feminism: A New Directions Essay. Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34 (1): 175–96.Google Scholar
Snyder-Hall, R. Claire. 2008. The Ideology of Wifely Submission: A Challenge for Feminism. Politics and Gender 4 (4): 563–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umansky, Lauri. 1996. Motherhood Reconceived: Feminism and the Legacies of the Sixties. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Rebecca, ed. 1995. To Be Real: Telling the Truth and Changing the Face of Feminism. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Wolf, Naomi. 2006. Two Traditions. In The Women's Movement Today: An Encyclopedia of Third Wave Feminism, Volume 2: Primary Documents, ed. Heywood, Leslie L.. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar