Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:05:19.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ripples from the First Wave: The Monarchical Origins of the Welfare State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2015

Abstract

Before the welfare state, people were protected from disabilities resulting from illness, old age, and other infirmities by care work provided within the family. When the state assumes responsibility for care-work tasks, in effect it assumes parental roles, thereby becoming a form of familial government in which the public provision of goods and services is analogous to care work provided in the family. My research pushes back the origins of the state’s obligation to care for people to a preindustrial form of government, hereditary monarchies—what Max Weber termed patrimonialism. It explicates how monarchs were cast as the parents of the people, thereby constituting kingship as a care work regime that assigned to political rulers parental responsibility for the welfare of the people. Using historical and quantitative analysis, I establish that retaining the legitimacy of monarchies as the first form of familial government in the course of Western European democratizing makes it more credible to the public and to political elites to accept the welfare state as the second form of familial government. That, in turn, promotes a more robust public sector supportive of social provision. The results reformulate conceptions of the contemporary welfare state and its developmental legacies.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovitz, Mimi. 2001. “Everyone Is Still on Welfare: The Role of Redistribution in Social Policy.” Social Work 46(4): 297308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Julia. 2007. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto F. and Giuliano, Paola. 2099. “Preferences for Redistribution.” No. W14825. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Allan, James P. and Scruggs, Lyle. 2004. “Political Partisanship and Welfare State Reform in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Katherine R., Fine, Mark A., and Demo, David H.. 2000. “An Overview of Family Diversity: Controversies, Questions, and Values.” In Handbook of Family Diversity, ed. Demo, David H. et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel Abraham and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civil Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . 1941. Politics. Ed. McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Arneil, Barbara. 1996. John Locke and America: The Defence of English Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Kate and Huber, John D.. 2010. “Economic versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 644–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, David C. and Tinnick, James D.. 2006. “Competing Visions of Parental Roles and Ideological Constructs.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Derek and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun, with Møller, Jørgen and Skaaning, Svend-Erik. Forthcoming. “Causation and Case Study Methods.” In Causal Case Studies—Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1985. “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor” Journal of Labor Economics.” 3(1): 3358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1993. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benadusi, Giovanna. 1995. “Rethinking the State: Family Strategies in Early Modern Tuscany.” Social History 20(2): 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1977. Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. 1765–1769. Commentaries on the Laws of England. Available at. http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/blackstone/bla-117.htm.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 1999. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 609–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine. 2010. “Directions of Decommodification: Gender and Generosity in 12 OECD Nations, 1980–2000.” European Sociological Review 26(2): 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. Language and Symbolic Power. Madison: Wisconsin University Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, Ralph H. 1947. German Theories of the Corporate State with Special Reference to the Period 1870–1919. New York: McGraw-Hill Co.Google Scholar
Bradley, David, Huber, Evelyne, Moller, Stephanie, Nielsen, François, and Stephens, John D.. 2003. “Distribution and Redistribution in Postindustrial Democracies.” World Politics 55(3): 193228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capaldi, Nicholas and Lloyd, Gordon. 2010. The Two Narratives of Political Economy. New York: Wiley-Scrivener.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis and McKinlay, R. D.. 1979. “Public Welfare Provision, Scandinavia, and the Sheer Futility of the Sociological Approach to Politics.” British Journal of Political Science 9(2): 157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis G. and Mitchell, Deborah. 1993. “Worlds of Welfare and Families of Nations,” In Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies, ed. Castles, F.G. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis G., Leibfried, Stephan, Lewis, Jane, Obinger, Herbert, and Pierson, Christopher (eds). 2010. The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Chin-Oh, Chen, Shu-Mei, and Tsuriel Somerville, C.. 2002. “Economic and Social Status in Household Decision Making: Evidence from Extended Family Mobility.” CUER Working Paper. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranston, Maurice. 1989. “The French Revolution: Ideas and Ideologies.” History Today 39(5): Available at http://www.histortoday.com.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise, Watson, Margaret, and Waller, Maureen R.. 2008. “Understanding ‘Power Talk:’ Language, Public Policy, and Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 6(1): 7188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desan, Christine. 2015. Making Money: Coin, Currency, and the Coming of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John and Goodin, Robert E.. 1986. “Risk-Sharing and Social Justice: The Motivational Foundations of the Post-War Welfare State.” British Journal of Political Science 16(1):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duruy, Victor. 1886. History of Rome and of the Roman People from Its Origin to the Establishment of the Christian Empire, vol. 5. Trans. Ripley, M. M. and Clarke, W. J., ed. Rev. Mahaffy, J. P.. Boston: Dana Estes and Charles E. Lauriat.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. 1997. The Education of a Christian Prince. Ed. Jardine, Lisa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ertman, Thomas. 1997. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2002. Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filmer, Robert. 1991. Patriarcha and Other Writings (ed) Sommerville, Johann P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2004. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 2011. “The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State.” Emory Law Journal 60.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. forthcoming. The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition. Princeton, NJ: University Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson and Grear, Anna, eds. 2013. “Vulnerability and Resilience.” In Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics. London: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2011. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gardner, Jane F. 1998. Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., and Washington, Ebonya. 2010. Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104(4): 720–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GESIS ZA-No.0025, “Attitudes towards the Monarchy (Dutch), Code Book translated by Huy Tran, data prepared for analysis by Ista Zahn.Google Scholar
Gibbs v. Titelman, 369 F. Supp. 38 (1973).Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul. 1995. “Family, Civil Society and the State in Contemporary European History: Some Methodological Considerations.” Contemporary European History 4(3): 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie. 2000. The Shadow Welfare State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob. 2002. The Divided Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Lamont, Michle. 2009. Successful Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, Russell L., Mead, Lawrence M., Ernst, Rose, Boettke, Peter J., and Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 2012. “Neoliberalism, Race, and the American Welfare State: A Discussion of Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording, and Sanford F. Schram’s Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race.” Perspectives on Politics 10(4): 979–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander. 1999. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 1997. The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Ragin, Charles, and Stephens, John D.. 1993. “Social Democracy, Christian Democracy, Constitutional Structure, and the Welfare State.” American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 711–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyn and Stephens, John D.. 2000. “Partisan Governance, Women’s Employment, and the Social Democratic Service State.” American Sociological Review 65(3): 323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyn and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D.. 2005. “Welfare Stats and the Economy.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, ed. Smelser, Neil J. and Swedberg, Richard. 2d. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Humphries, Jane. 1991. “Method, Materialism, and Marxist-Feminism: A Comment on Matthae,” In Radical Economics, ed. Roberts, Bruce and Feiner, Susan. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian. 2010. “Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 551–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2001. “The Dynamics of Welfare State Expansion: Trade Openness, DeIndustrialization and Partisan Politics.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, ed. Pierson, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 2005. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2010. Women, Work, and Politics: The Political Economy of Gender Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2006. “Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More than Others.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2009. “Distribution and Redistribution: The Shadow From the Nineteenth Century.” World Politics 61(3): 438–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben and Soskice, David. 2010. “Real Exchange Rates and Competitiveness: The Political Economy of Skill Formation, Wage Compression and Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 104(3): 601–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2011. “Inequality and Redistribution: A Unified Approach to the Role of Economic and Political Institutions.” Revue économique 62(4): 629–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Mads Meier. 2009. “United but Divided: Welfare Regimes and the Level and Variance in Public Support for Redistribution.” European Sociological Review 25(6): 723–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kangas, Olli. 1991. “The Bigger the Better? On the Dimensions of Welfare State Development: Social Expenditures versus Social Rights.” Acta Sociologica 34(1): 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane. 1999. “Do Social-Welfare Policies Reduce Poverty? A Cross-National Assessment.” Social Forces 77(3): 1119–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane and Pontusson, Jonas. 2005. “Rising Inequality and the Politics of Redistribution in Affluent Countries.” Perspectives on Politics 3(3): 449–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Desmond. 1995. Actively Seeking Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Desmond and Lieberman, Robert C.. 2009. “Ironies of State Building: A Comparative Perspective on the American State.” World Politics 61(3): 547–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinerman, Benjamin A. 2007. “Can the Prince Really Be Tamed? Executive Prerogative, Popular Apathy, and the Constitutional Frame in Locke’s Second Treatise. American Political Science Review 101(2): 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1978. The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism: Work, Unions, and Politics in Sweden. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1980. “Social Policy and Distributional Conflict in the Capitalist Democracies: A Preliminary Framework.” West European Politics 3(3): 296316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 1989. “Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship: Social Rights during Sickness in Eighteen OECD Countries since 1930.” American Sociological Review 54(3): 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2006. “Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism: Protagonists, Consenters, and Antagonists.” World Politics 58: 167206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhnle, Stein and Sander, Anne, 2010. “The Emergence of the Welfare State.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, ed. Castles, Francis G., Leibfried, Stephan, Lewis, Jane, Obinger, Herbert, and Pierson, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lauer, Josh. 2008. “Money as Mass Communication: U.S. Paper Currency and the Iconography of Nationalism.” Communication Review 11(2): 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichbach, Mark. 2010. “Charles Tilly’s Problem Situations: From Class and Revolution to Mechanisms and Contentious Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 543–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1990. Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1997. American Exceptionalism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1960 [1689]. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Shelly and Pollak, Robert A.. 1996. “Bargaining and Distribution in Marriage.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(4): 139–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttmer, Erzo FP and Singhal, Monica. 2011. “Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution.” Economic Policy 3(1): 157–79.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1988. The Prince. Ed. Skinner, Quentin and Price, Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29(4):507548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manassa, Colleen. 2003. The Great Karnak Inscription of Merneptah: Grand Strategy in the 13th Century. New Haven, CT. Yale Egyptological Seminar.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power: Vol. 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Michael. 2012. The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manow, Philip. 2009. “Electoral Rules, Class Coalitions and Welfare State Regimes, or How to Explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan.” Socio-Economic Review 7(1): 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Jeremy D. and Sigelman, Lee. 1998. “Zog for Albania, Edward for Estonia, and Monarchs for All the Rest? The Royal Road to Prosperity, Democracy, and World Peace.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31(4): 771–74.Google Scholar
McCall, Leslie and Kenworthy, Lane. 2009. “Americans’ Social Policy Preferences in the Era of Rising Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics 7(3): 459–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2009. The Motherless State: American Democracy and Women’s Political Leadership. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2010. “It Takes a State: A Policy Feedback Model of Women’s Political Representation,” Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 6991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. Forthcoming. Parents of the People: The Monarchical Origins of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Melling, Joseph. 1992. “Welfare Capitalism and the Origins of Welfare States: British Industry, Workplace Welfare and Social Reform, C. 1870–1914.” Social History 17(3): 453–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H. and Richard, Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” The Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 1998. Dividing Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2010. “Reconstituting the Submerged State: The Challenges of Social Policy Reform in the Obama Era.” Perspectives on Politics 8(3): 803–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1988. “The Lady and the Tramp (II): Feminist Welfare Politics, Poor Single Mothers, and the Challenge of Welfare Justice.” Feminist Studies 24(1): 5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, Stephanie, Huber, Evelyne, Stephens, John D., Bradley, David and Nielsen, François. 2003. “Determinants of Relative Poverty in Advanced Democracies. American Sociological Review 68(1): 2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Michael. 1988. “Crises of the Welfare State.” British Journal of Political Science 18(3): 397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly J. and Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2011. The Delegated Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol. 2005. “Locke, Alger, and Atomistic Individualism Fifty Years Later: Revisiting Louis Hartz“s Liberal Tradition in America.” Studies in American Political Development 19(2): 206–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol. 2014. “The Private Roots of American Political Development: The Immigrants’ Protective League’s ‘Friendly and Sympathetic Touch’, 1908–1924.” Studies in American Political Development 28(2): 129–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nackenoff, Carol and Novkov, Julie, eds. 2014. Statebuilding from the Margins: Between Reconstruction and the New Deal. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathanson, Stephen. 1997. Economic Justice. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. 2010. The Hebrew Republic: Jewish Sources and the Transformation of European Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Eric. 2014. The Royalist Revolution: Monarchy and the American Founding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Julia, Shola Orloff, Ann, and Shaver, Sheila. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Frances E. 1983. “The Family and the Market: A Study of Ideology and Legal Reform. Harvard Law Review 96(7): 1497–578.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58(3): 5178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 2009a. “Gendering the Comparative Analysis of Welfare States: An Unfinished Agenda.” Sociological Theory 27(3): 317–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 2009b. “The Power of Gender Perspectives: Feminist Influence on Policy Paradigms, Social Science and Social Politics.” Social Politics 16: 405581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 2006. “From Maternalism to ‘Employment for All:’ State Policies to Promote Women’s Employment Across the Affluent Democracies.” in The State after Statism: New State Activities in the Era of Globalization and Liberalization, ed. Levy, Jonah. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary. Available at http://www.oed.com/Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. 2000. Political Writings, ed. Kuklick, Bruce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Cheolsung. 2007. “Marriage Market, Parents’ Bargaining Powers, and Children’s Nutrition and Education.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69(6): 773–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Wilfrid. 1942. “The Mediaeval Theory of the Tyrant.” Review of Politics 4(2): 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternik, Eric M. and Zelizer, Julian E.. 2013. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics 11(4): 1071–87.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 2013. “The Patriarchal Welfare State.” In The Welfare State Reader, ed. Pierson, Christopher, Castles, Francis G., and Naumann, Ingela K.. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Susan. 1993. Family, Dependence, and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britain and France, 1914–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 48(2): 143–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul ed. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A.. 1971. Regulating the Poor. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances, Salmond, Rob, and Thies, Michael F.. 2006. “Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation.” Politics & Gender 2(2): 165–92.Google Scholar
Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982).Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Diane. 1996. Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1966. “Gender, Metaphor and the State.” Feminist Review 52: 118–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmemann, Serge. 2014, “Monarchies, More Useful Than You Think,” New York Times, June 3, A22.Google Scholar
Schleiter, Petra and Morgan-Jones, Edward. 2009. “Constitutional Power and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets.” American Political Science Review 103(3): 496512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, Lyle and Allan, James P.. 2006. “The Material consequences of Welfare States: Benefit Generosity and Absolute Poverty in 16 OECD Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 39(7): 880904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidney, Algernon. 1996. Discourses Concerning Government, ed. West, Thomas G.. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg and Frisby, David. 1990. The Philosophy of Money / Georg Simmel; ed. Frisby, David; translated by Tom Bottomore and David Frisby from a first draft by Kaethe Mengelberg. n.p.: London; New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 2011. The Philosophy of Money, ed. Frisby, David. London: Routledge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1987. “A Society without a ‘State’? Political Organization, Social Conflict, and Welfare Provision in the United States.” Journal of Public Policy 7(4): 349–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soberman, David and Gatignon, Hubert. 2005. “Research Issues at the Boundary of Competitive Dynamics and Market Evolution.” Marketing Science 24(1): 165–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P., ed. 1995. King James VI and I: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sørensen, Aage B. 1998. “On Kings, Pietism and Rent-Seeking in Scandinavian Welfare States.” Acta Sociologica. 41:4, 363373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joeand Schram, Sanford F.. 2007. “A Public Transformed? Welfare Reform as Policy Feedback.” American Political Science Review 101(1): 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, Joe Fording, Richard C., and Schram, Sanford F.. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stead, M. T. 1914. “Manegold of Lutenbach.” English Historical Review 29(113): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegmueller. 2012 –see n. 40.Google Scholar
Stegmueller, Daniel, Scheepers, Peer, Roßteutscher, Sigrid, and Jong, Eelke de. 2012. “Support for Redistribution in Western Europe: Assessing the Role of Religion. European Sociological Review 28(4): 482–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred and Linz, Juan J.. 2011. “Comparative Perspectives on Inequality and the Quality of Democracy in the United States. Perspectives on Politics 9(4): 841–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, Linz, Juan J., and Minoves, Juli F.. 2014. “Democratic Parliamentary Monarchies.” Journal of Democracy 25(2): 3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, John D. 2010. “The Social Rights of Citizenship.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, ed. Castles, Frances, Leibfried, Stephan, Lewis, Jane, Obinger, Herbert, and Pierson, Christopher. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strach, Patricia. 2007. All in the Family. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strach, Patricia. 2013 “The Family” In Oxford Handbook of American Political Development, ed. Lieberman, Robert C., Mettler, Suzanne, and Valelly, Rick. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Svallfors, Stefan. 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13(3): 283–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, Duane and Martin, Cathie Jo. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth and Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmus, Richard M. 1958. Essays on the Welfare State. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Titmuss, Richard M. 1964. “War and Social Policy.” In Essays in ‘the Welfare State’. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, James. 1681. Patriarcha non Monarcha. London: Richard Janeway.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1964. Max Weber: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Ed. Parsons, Talcott. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1987. Economy and Society. Ed. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus vol. I, II. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilensky, Harold. 1975. The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wittenberg, Jason. 2006. Crucibles of Political Loyalty: Church Institutions and Electoral Continuity in Hungary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Steven H. and Aron, Laudon, eds. 2013. U.S. Health in International Perspective: Shorter Lives, Poorer Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. 1990. “Milton’s Republicanism and the Tyranny of Heaven.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worden, Blair. 1991. “English Republicanism.” In The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J.H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McDonagh supplementary material

Appendix A

Download McDonagh supplementary material(File)
File 86.4 KB