Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:48:43.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It Takes a State: A Policy Feedback Model of Women's Political Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Eileen McDonagh
Eileen McDonagh
Affiliation:
Northeastern University. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

American women attain more professional success in medicine, business, and higher education than do most of their counterparts around the world. An enduring puzzle is, therefore, why the US lags so far behind other countries when it comes to women's political representation. In 2008, women held only 16.8 percent of seats in the House of Representatives, a proportion that ranks America lower than 83 other countries. This article addresses this conundrum. It establishes that equal rights alone are insufficient to ensure equal access to political office. Also necessary are public policies representing maternal traits that voters associate with women. Such policies have feedback effects that teach voters that the maternal traits attributed to women represent strengths not only in the private sphere of the home but also in the public sphere of the state. Most other democracies now have such policies in place, but the United States lacks such policies, which accounts for its laggard status with regard to the political representation of women.

Type
Research Article
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 69 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, William. 1975. Candidate Characteristics, Office of Election and Voter Response. Experimental Study of Politics 4: 76–91.Google Scholar
Alexander, Deborah, and Andersen, Kristi. 1993. Gender as a Factor in the Attributions of Leadership Traits. Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Margaret L. 2005. Thinking About Women: A Quarter Century's View. Gender and Society 19 (4): 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Arthur S., ed. 1991. Political Handbook of the World. Binghamton: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Barker, David C., and Hansen, Susan B.. 2005. All Things Considered: Systematic Cognitive Processing and Electoral Decision-Making. Journal of Politics 67 (2): 319–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen, and Cowell-Meyers, Kimberly. 2007. Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women's Political Representation. Perspective on Politics 5 (3): 553–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielby, W.T., and Barron, J.N. 1984. A Woman's Place is with Other Women: Segregation within Organizations. In Sex Segregation in the Workplace, ed. Reskin, B.F.. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Bih-er, Chou, Clark, Cal, and Clark, Janet. 1990. Women in Taiwan Politics: Overcoming Barriers to Women's Participation in a Modernizing Society. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Bledsoe, Timothy, and Herring, Mary. 1990. Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office. American Political Science Review 84 (1): 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanor, Vernon. 1995. The Monarchy and the Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2006. “Policy Feedbacks and the Political Mobilization of Mass Publics.” Unpublished manuscript in author's possession.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents. Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement wit the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Cowley, Philip, and Childs, Sarah. 2003. Too Spineless to Rebel? New Labour's Women MPs. British Journal of Political Science 33 (3): 345–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1994. Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. In The Public Nature of Private Violence, ed. Fineman, Martha Ablertson and Mykitiuk, Rixanne. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise, Watson, Margaret, and Waller, Maureen R.. 2008. Understanding ‘Power Talk’: Language, Public Policy, and Democracy. Perspectives on Politics 6 (1): 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics. Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1998. Using Quotas to Increase Women's Political Representation. In Gender Quotas in a Comparative Perspective, ed. Dahlerup, D.. Geneva: ECPR Research Session Report, September 2002.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2002. “Quotas—A Jump to Equality? The Need for International Comparisons of the Use of Electoral Quotas to Obtain Equal Political Citizenship for Women.” Presented at International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) Workshop, Jakarta, Indonesia, September 25.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2003. “The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences.” Presented at the International IDEA Workshop, Lima, Peru, February 23–24.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2004. “No Quota Fever in Europe?” Presented at the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA)/CEE Network for Gender Issues Conference, Budapest, Hungary, October 22–23.Google Scholar
Darcy, R., Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections and Representation, 2d ed. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Julie. 2002. Representative Bureaucracy in the Federal Executive: Gender and Spending Priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12 (3): 353–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1997. Gender Differences in Support for Women Candidates: Is there a Glass Ceiling in American Politics? Women and Politics 17 (2): 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia, and Kelly, Rita Mae, eds. 1996. Gender Power, Leadership and Governance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 1987. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 1999. The Processing of Nested Persuasive Messages. Psychological Inquiry 10 (2): 123–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary C., and van Engen, Marloes L.. 2003. Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men. Psychological Bulletin 129 (4): 569–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2004. Entering the Arena: Gender and the Decision to Run for Office. American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 264–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Lawless, Jennifer L.. 2005. To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition. American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 642–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., Lawless, Jennifer, and Feeley, Courtney. 2001. Gender and the Decision to Run for Office. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (3): 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Richard L., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 2003. Gender Stereotyping in State Executive Elections: Candidate Selection and Success. Journal of Politics 65 (3): 833–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedan, Betty. 1963. The Feminine Mystique. New York: Dell Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2002. Spirals of Trust? The Effect of Descriptive Representation on the Relationship Between Citizens and Their Government. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 717–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Leslie Freidman. 1989. The Constitutional Rights of Women: Cases in Law and Social Change. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark M., Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2006. Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000. International Organization 60: 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groshen, Erica L. 1991. The Structure of the Female/Male Wage Differential: Is It Who You Are, What You Do, or Where You Work? Journal of Human Resources 26 (3): 457–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S. 2002. The Divided Welfare State: The Battle over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1986. Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. When Multiplication Doesn't Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics 5(1): 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund, Ronald D., Freeman, Patricia K., Hamm, Keith E., and Stein, Robert. 1979. The Electability of Women Candidates: The Effects of Sex Role Stereotypes. Journal of Politic 41 (2): 513–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, David B. 1981. Political Culture and Female Political Representation. Journal of Politics 43 (1): 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1989. Freedom, Recognition, and Obligation: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory. American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1227–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael, McDermott, Rose, and Stam, Allan C.. 2005. Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (5): 661–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2004a. Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups. Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2004b. Learning from Gender Quotas. In Social Inclusion and Economic Development in Latin America, ed. Buvinic, Mayra and Mazza, Jacqueline. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Jones, Mark. 2002. Engendering the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Electoral Quotas and Women's Leadership. In Latin America in Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, eds. Craske, Nikki and Molyneux, Maxine. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993a. Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 119–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, and Terkildsen, Nayda. 1993b. The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different levels and Types of Offices. Political Research Quarterly 46 (3): 503–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, Helen, ed. 1996. A Woman's Constitution: Gender & History in the Australian Commonwealth. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.Google Scholar
Jeydel, Alana, and Taylor, Andrew J.. 2003. Are Women Legislators Less Effective? Political Research Quarterly 56 (1): 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2004. Quota Legislation and the Election of Women: Learning from the Costa Rican Experience. Journal of Politics 66 (4): 1203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Kim F. 1996. The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. Power and Influence in State Legislative Policy-making. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. 2005. When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-century America. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark. 2002. Problematic Perhaps, but Not Irrational. Stanford Law Review 54 (6): 1273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Malami, Melissa. 1999. Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis. Social Forces 78 (1): 235–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Jeffrey W. 2000. Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations? Journal of Politic 62 (2): 414–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide. Politics and Gender 2 (3): 303–27.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2007. Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis. European Journal of Political Research 46: 367–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudva, Neema. 2003. Engineering Elections: The Experiences of Women in Panchayati Raj in Karnataka, India. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 16 (3): 445–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunicová, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. Electoral rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption. British Journal of Political Science 35: 573–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer. 2004a. Women, War, and Winning Elections: Gender Stereotyping in the Post-September 11th Era. Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer. 2004b. Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation. Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer, and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer, and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluation the Conventional Wisdom. Journal of Politics 70 (1): 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1986. Women and European Politics. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16 (July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administration Review 32 (July-August)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine A. 2005. Women's Lives, Men's Laws. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H., and Bottomore, Tom, eds. 1992 (1950). Citizenship and Social Class. Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 1998. Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (1): 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Taylor, Michelle M.. 1997. Electoral System Effects on Women's Representation: Theoretical Arguments and Evidence From Costa Rica. Comparative Political Studies 30 (2): 186–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Jeremy D., and Sigelman, Lee. 1998. Zog for Albania, Edward for Estonia, and Monarchs for All the Rest? The Royal Road to Prosperity, Democracy, and World Peace. PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (4): 771–74.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, Ian. 1997. Australia. In Passages to Power: Legislative recruitment in advanced democracies, ed. Norris, Pippa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1998. Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections. Political Research Quarterly 51 (4): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2007. Forging a New Grammar of Equality and Difference: Progressive Era Suffrage and Reform, In Formative Acts: Reckoning with Agency in American Politics, eds. Skowronek, Stephen and Glassman, Mathew. Philadelphia: University Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2009. The Motherless State: Women's Political Leadership and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlen, Nancy, and O'Connor, Karen. 1995. Women, Politics and American Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
McGuire, Gail M., and Reskin, Barbara F.. 1993. Authority Hierarchies at Work: the Impacts of Race and Sex. Gender and Society 7 (4): 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: the G.I. Bill and the making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne, and Welch, Eric. 2004. Civic Generation: Policy Feedback Effects of the G.I. Bill on Political Involvement Over the Life Course. British Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Gwen, and Shackman, Gene. 1996. Gender and Authority: A Cross-National Study. Social Science Quartely 77: 273–88.Google Scholar
Nechemias, Carol. 1987. Changes in the Election of Women to U.S. State Legislative Seats. Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (1): 125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States. American Sociological Review 58 (3): 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1991. Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 1997. Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis. Social Science Research 26: 442–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, and Kunovich, Sheri. 2003. Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology. Social Forces 82 (1): 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1993. Democracy and Difference. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1992. ‘Policy Feedbacks’ and Political Change: Contrasting Reagan and Thatcher's Pension-Reform Initiatives. Studies in American Political Development 6 (2): 361–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45: 595–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince-Gibson, Eetta, and Schwartz, Shalom H.. 1998. Value Priorities and Gender. Social Psychology Quarterly 61 (1): 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prochaska, Frank. 1995. Royal Bounty: The Making of a Welfare Monarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Reskin, Barbara F., and Bielby, Denise D.. 2005. A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (1): 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reskin, Barbara F., and McBrier, Debra Branch. 2000. Why Not Ascription? Organizations' Employment of Male and Female Managers. American Sociological Review 65: 210–33.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 1999. Women in the Legilsatures and Exectuives of the World Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling. World Politic 51: 547–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Linda K. 1990. Exploring Theories of Female Leadership in South and Southeast Asia. Pacific Affairs 63 (4): 524–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Gretchen. 2006. The Constitution as Social Design: Gender and Civic Membership in the American Constitutional Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances, Salmond, Rob, and Thies, Michael F.. 2006. Welfare Works: Explaining Female Legislative Representation. Politics and Gender 2: 165–92.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenwasser, Shirley M., and Dean, Norman G.. 1989. Gender Role and Political Office: Effects of Perceived Masculinity/Femininity of Candidate and Political Office. Psychology of Women Quarterly 13 (1): 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1981. Why Women Don't Run: The Critical Contextual Factors in Women's Legislative Recruitment. Western Political Quarterly 34 (1): 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1990. Why More Women Are State Legislators: A Research Note. Western Political Quarterly 43 (2): 437–48.Google Scholar
Sacchet, Teresa. 2008. Beyond Numbers: The Impact of Gender Quotas in Latin America. International Feminist Journal of Politics 10 (3): 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002a. Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures. Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002b. Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1998. Democracy Minus Women Is Not Democracy: Gender and World Changes in Citizenship. In Citizenship and Citizenship Education in a Changing World, ed. Ichilov, Orit. London: Woburn Press.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2000. “Feminism, Representation, and Impartiality.” Paper Presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, London.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2002. The Representation of Women in Australia: Meaning and Make-Believe. Parliamentary Affairs 55: 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2009. Women and the 2007 Federal Election. Australian Cultural History 27 (2): 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 2005. Parité. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Views of Citizenship in U.S. History. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue, and Welch, Susan. 1991. The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators. Western Political Quarterly 44: 445–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, and Josephson, Jyl J.. 2000. Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Vengroff, Richard, Nyiri, Zsolt, and Fugiero, Melissa. 2003. Electoral System and Gender Representation in Sub-National Legislatures: Is There a National Gender Gap? Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 163–173.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Studlar, Donley T.. 1990. Multi-Member Districts and the Representation of Women: Evidence from Britain and the United States. Journal of Politics 52 (2): 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking. Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, Linda, Paget, Karen M., and Matthews, Glenna. 1995. Running as a Woman: Gender and Power in American Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yoder, Janice D. 1991. Rethinking Tokenism: Looking Beyond Numbers. Gender and Society 5 (2): 178–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetterberg, Pär. 2008. “Do Gender Quotas Foster Women's Political Engagement? Lessons from Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly OnlineFirst 10:1177/1065912908322411.Google Scholar