Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:47:29.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gendering Comparative Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2010

Teri L. Caraway
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Abstract

This essay offers a conceptualization of a comparative politics of gender (CPG) and some explanations for why CPG work is marginalized in the comparative politics subfield. I delineate CPG as a field of study in which gendered dependent or independent variables are the defining feature and present illustrative examples of four different types of CPG research. I contend that institutional and historical factors account for much of the marginalization of CPG research, and I propose some courses of actions through which CPG scholars can lessen this marginalization. The failure of comparative politics scholars to engage with gendered work is also a serious problem. The essay concludes by offering some suggestions for better integrating CPG scholarship into the subfield.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2001. Gender Frames and Collective Action: Configurations of Masculinity in the Pittston Coal Strike. Politics & Society 29 (2): 297330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005. A Common Language of Gender? Politics & Gender 1 (1): 128–36.Google Scholar
Caraway, Teri L. 2004. Inclusion and Democratization: Class, Gender, Race, and the Extension of Suffrage. Comparative Politics 36 (4): 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caraway, Teri L. 2007. Assembling Women: The Feminization of Global Manufacturing. Ithaca, NY: ILR/Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Lousie. 2006. Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered “Logic of Appropriateness”. Politics & Gender 2 (2): 223–34.Google Scholar
Charrad, Mounira M. 2001. States and Women's Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berekeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Connell, R.W. 1987. Gender and Power. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth J. 2000. Unfinished Transitions: Women and the Gendered Development of Democracy in Venezuela, 1936–1996. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, Walter. 2000. Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States. Social Politics 7 (Summer): 127–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Kimberly. 2006. Working Mothers and the Welfare State: Religion and the Politics of Work-Family Policies in Western Europe and the United States. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 2000. Women's Suffrage in the Measurement of Democracy: Problems of Operationalization. Studies in Comparative International Development 35 (3): 92111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Susan. 1993. Family, Dependence, and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britain and France 1914–1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Three Worlds of Welfare State Research. Comparative Political Studies 33 (6/7): 791821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach. 1988. Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2006. Why So Slow? The Challenges of Gendering Comparative Politics. Politics & Gender 2 (2): 249–63.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2006. The Structure of Intersectionality: A Comparative Politics of Gender. Politics & Gender 2 (2): 235–48.Google Scholar